Re: [gentoo-dev] PR mass closing
First of all, please don't send HTML mail. On Sat, 2020-05-16 at 20:08 +0200, lssndrbarbi...@gmail.com wrote: > Was it necessary to mass close my PR on GitHub? I’ve lost quite some time to > make them and I’m a bit upset. I'm sorry but if you start mass-filing pull requests without consulting anyone first, you have only yourself to blame. I am also upset that I had to manually close a dozen PRs. > How much we have to wait to get rid of python2? The rule of thumb would be until we get rid of all packages requiring Python 2. > The earlier the better because portage want to pull in python2 stuff if > available even when I don’t want. Then set PYTHON_TARGETS appropriately. Duplicating ebuild revisions doesn't help anyone. As explained on the pull request. Neither does complaining. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[gentoo-dev] PR mass closing
Was it necessary to mass close my PR on GitHub? I’ve lost quite some time to make them and I’m a bit upset.How much we have to wait to get rid of python2? The earlier the better because portage want to pull in python2 stuff if available even when I don’t want.
[gentoo-dev] PR mass closing
Was it necessary to mass close my PR on GitHub? I’ve lost quite some time to make them and I’m a bit upset.How much we have to wait to get rid of python2? The earlier the better because portage want to pull in python2 stuff if available even when I don’t want.
Re: [gentoo-dev] PR mass closing
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 2:08 PM wrote: > > Was it necessary to mass close my PR on GitHub? I’ve lost quite some time to > make them and I’m a bit upset. Most of us have no idea what you are talking about. Perhaps you should direct this message to whoever closed your pull request, or provide some context for the rest of us.
[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs
Hey all, here's a small list of packages dropped to maintainer-needed. Some are from retired proxied maintainers, and some are from me, ie packages I don't use anymore and see no reason to hoard ownership. (b) = open bugs, (v) = new version is available. app-backup/rsnapshot (b,v) app-misc/cargo-license dev-python/sphinxcontrib-documentedlist (b) gnome-extra/gnome-commander (b,v) media-libs/imlib2 media-plugins/imlib2_loaders sys-fs/compsize (b,v) sys-fs/cryfs (b) I also welcome co-maintainers to dev-libs/check or media-libs/rlottie, if anyone's interested. -- juippis signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last-rites: app-office/pybliographer
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 4:36 PM Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > > # Andreas Sturmlechner (2020-05-01) > # Last release in 2018, wip/gtk3 branch untouched since 2017. Bug #598906 > # Stuck on Python 2 and pygtk. Masked for removal in 30 days. > app-office/pybliographer I added dev-python/python-bibtex to this mask. It is also stuck on python2, and pybliographer is the only reverse dependency.
