Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: x11-libs/libfm
On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 08:49:49 +0300 Joonas Niilola wrote: > On 8/13/20 7:25 AM, Jimi Huotari wrote: > > Unless I'm being blind, the LXQt project does not need this one, > > making it 'maintainer-needed': > > > > x11-libs/libfm > > > Seems to be needed by LXDE stuff only. Regarding that, should we > last-rite remaining LXDE stuff? It's pretty clear the development has > shifted to LXQT, and LXDE seems abandoned upstream. > > -- juippis > > There has been some activity in, for example, libfm itself a few months ago (by non-LXQt developers, or at least I don't recognise the names): https://git.lxde.org/gitweb/?a=project_list;pf=lxde But yeah, so far it looks like no one is picking it up in Gentoo either, so it might be time. pgp8F08GjUbNB.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: x11-libs/libfm
On 8/13/20 7:25 AM, Jimi Huotari wrote: > Unless I'm being blind, the LXQt project does not need this one, making it > 'maintainer-needed': > > x11-libs/libfm > Seems to be needed by LXDE stuff only. Regarding that, should we last-rite remaining LXDE stuff? It's pretty clear the development has shifted to LXQT, and LXDE seems abandoned upstream. -- juippis signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: x11-libs/libfm
Unless I'm being blind, the LXQt project does not need this one, making it 'maintainer-needed': x11-libs/libfm See also: - https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699016 - https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700186 - https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/17109 pgprURBlXgtec.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: x11-misc/gpaste
Dear all the following packages are up for grabs after retirement of the proxied maintainer: x11-misc/gpaste https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/x11-misc/gpaste -- Best, Jonas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: app-admin/apg
Dear all the following packages are up for grabs after retirement of the proxied maintainer: app-admin/apg https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/app-admin/apg https://bugs.gentoo.org/629272 https://bugs.gentoo.org/643368 -- Best, Jonas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: switching default udev provider for new systems to udev
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 8:51 PM William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > I would like to propose that we switch the default udev provider on new > systems from eudev to udev. > > This is not a lastrites, and it will not affect current systems since > they have to migrate manually. Also, this change can be overridden at > the profile level if some profile needs eudev (the last time I checked, > this applies to non-glibc configurations). > > What do people think? > > Thanks, > > William > > I had the opposite problem, udev failed to work with newer udev-init-scripts so all my systems were migrated to eudev. Looking at the bug report (https://bugs.gentoo.org/681586), some of the others had the same experience. It was a drop-in replacement for me, personally I don't care if I have udev or eudev installed (if it works). Tomas
