Heptapod (https://foss.heptapod.net/) is open-source hosting based on
GitLab for Mercurial repositories.
---
metadata.xsd | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/metadata.xsd b/metadata.xsd
index 8b8ac0b..db243ab 100644
--- a/metadata.xsd
+++ b/metadata.xsd
@@ -272,6 +272,7 @@
On 27/08/2020 12:37, Max Magorsch wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:10 PM Alexis Ballier wrote:
>> Any plans on using the remoteid from metadata.xml ?
>> It's likely to be much more accurate since people have been filling
>> those manually for some time now ;)
>>
>
> I think we could use the
On 2020-08-26 20:57, Max Magorsch wrote:
> To avoid these false warnings it's now possible to filter the repology
> checks.
No more false warnings due to Repology not understanding the Gentoo Perl
version scheme? Yes please! Thank you *very* much for this feature, and
in case I haven't said it
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:10 PM Alexis Ballier wrote:
> Any plans on using the remoteid from metadata.xml ?
> It's likely to be much more accurate since people have been filling
> those manually for some time now ;)
>
I think we could use the remoteid in future to improve the repology
warnings.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:00 PM Nils Freydank wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the work around p.g.o! I'd directly like to use your opt out for a
> package I maintain in proxied mode:
>
> The following changes since commit b1e0b4c9ec76049631cbb0a2d3798adbce2075ac:
>
> Ignore
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 18:57 +, Max Magorsch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Good news regarding packages.g.o!
>
> While the new packages.g.o version went into production some time
> ago,
> this also led to some false warnings about outdated package versions.
> This is because we currently take
On 2020-08-27 11:46, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> IMHO this means that the "gui" flag should be enabled in desktop
> profiles (similar to "X").
>
> Any comments? If not, I'll enable it in two days from now.
Makes sense to me, go ahead.
--
MS
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 11:46 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> QA policy says that packages should use the "gui" USE flag for
> optional
> GUI support:
> https://projects.gentoo.org/qa/policy-guide/use-flags.html#pg0802
>
> IMHO this means that the "gui" flag should be enabled in desktop
> profiles
Hi,
thanks for the work around p.g.o! I'd directly like to use your opt out for a
package I maintain in proxied mode:
The following changes since commit b1e0b4c9ec76049631cbb0a2d3798adbce2075ac:
Ignore net-misc/dropbox::void_x86_64 for repology (2020-08-26 19:14:45 +0200)
are available in
On 2020-08-18 14:05, Joonas Niilola wrote:
> I'm suggesting of adding a new metadata flag to our Wiki's
> User:/Project: page which then prints a message to this page saying
> whether the maintainer (be it project or user), "accepts" or "deals
> with" Github contributions. The wording can be a
QA policy says that packages should use the "gui" USE flag for optional
GUI support:
https://projects.gentoo.org/qa/policy-guide/use-flags.html#pg0802
IMHO this means that the "gui" flag should be enabled in desktop
profiles (similar to "X").
Any comments? If not, I'll enable it in two days from
On 24/08/2020 13.57, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
> dev-libs/girara
> app-text/zathura-ps
> app-text/zathura-pdf-poppler
> app-text/zathura-pdf-mupdf
> app-text/zathura-djvu
> app-text/zathura-cb
> app-text/zathura
>
>
> Are for grabs now, I do not use them daily anymore. A separate active
> maintainer
12 matches
Mail list logo
