Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] acct-user.eclass: don't modify existing user by default

Whissi's patch in itself is a good step forward, but I don't feel it goes far enough, nor promotes better defaults for the unmodified cases. On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 02:35:58AM +0100, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > Modifying an existing user is a bad default and makes Gentoo > special because it is

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New go.gentoo.org url shortener

On 12/8/20 3:55 PM, Max Magorsch wrote: > Hi all, > > the tl;dr is that I've set up a new url shortener which is available > on https://go.gentoo.org/ currently. It can generate short links like > 'go.gentoo.org/XXX' or you can create custom persistent links like > 'go.gentoo.org/arzano/tyrian' o

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] acct-user.eclass: don't modify existing user by default

On 1/3/21 8:35 PM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: Modifying an existing user is a bad default and makes Gentoo special because it is common for system administrators to make modifications to user (i.e. putting an user into another service's group to allow that user to access service in question) and i

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] acct-user.eclass: don't modify existing user by default

On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 6:42 PM Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 8:35 PM Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > > > > Modifying an existing user is a bad default and makes Gentoo > > special because it is common for system administrators to make > > modifications to user (i.e. putting an user i

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] acct-user.eclass: don't modify existing user by default

On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 8:35 PM Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > > Modifying an existing user is a bad default and makes Gentoo > special because it is common for system administrators to make > modifications to user (i.e. putting an user into another service's > group to allow that user to access servi

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] acct-user.eclass: don't modify existing user by default

Modifying an existing user is a bad default and makes Gentoo special because it is common for system administrators to make modifications to user (i.e. putting an user into another service's group to allow that user to access service in question) and it would be unexpected to see these changes reve

[gentoo-dev] [News review] LibreSSL support discontinued

Hello, Please review the news item inlined below. This is based on what I discussed with blueness (LibreSSL team lead). The news item is kinda long-ish because I wanted to include the full rationale since I believe our users will find it desirable to know it. If it's ok, I'd like to push it soo

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] udev.eclass: copy sysroot/prefix logic from systemd.eclass

Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- eclass/udev.eclass | 18 -- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/udev.eclass b/eclass/udev.eclass index 9a65b080f171..8e256385f8ef 100644 --- a/eclass/udev.eclass +++ b/eclass/udev.eclass @@ -50,11 +50,25 @@ fi # @D

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/3] systemd.eclass: rework prefix logic for EAPI 7

Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- eclass/systemd.eclass | 15 +-- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/systemd.eclass b/eclass/systemd.eclass index f6d1fa2d92d6..9f439238fe6c 100644 --- a/eclass/systemd.eclass +++ b/eclass/systemd.eclass @@ -46,12 +46,23

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] udev.eclass: rework _udev_get_udevdir

Rewrite logic to resemble _systemd_get_dir from systemd.eclass. Remove incorrect command substitution: pkg-config --exists does not write to stdout. Die when pkg-config --variable fails. Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- eclass/udev.eclass | 10 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 dele

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: dev-db/percona-xtrabackup

Dear all the following packages are up for grabs after retirement of the proxied maintainer: dev-db/percona-xtrabackup https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/dev-db/percona-xtrabackup There are open bugs: https://bugs.gentoo.org/729696 dev-db/percona-xtrabackup fails to compile with clang Please

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dissolving project desktop-misc

On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 05:48:41PM +0200, Andreas wrote in <20350427.4csPzL39Zc@farino>: List of packages, please adopt: app-misc/remind I'd like to adopt this one please. https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/18929

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] systemd.eclass: remove SYSROOT from pkg-config output

On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 7:52 AM James Le Cuirot wrote: > > On Sat, 2 Jan 2021 20:09:04 -0500 > Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > When cross-compiling, users will typically have > > PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT=${SYSROOT} defined via pkg-config wrapper. > > > > When PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT is set, all paths included in

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] systemd.eclass: remove SYSROOT from pkg-config output

On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 12:52:08 + James Le Cuirot wrote: > On Sat, 2 Jan 2021 20:09:04 -0500 > Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > When cross-compiling, users will typically have > > PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT=${SYSROOT} defined via pkg-config wrapper. > > > > When PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT is set, all paths included

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] systemd.eclass: remove SYSROOT from pkg-config output

On Sat, 2 Jan 2021 20:09:04 -0500 Mike Gilbert wrote: > When cross-compiling, users will typically have > PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT=${SYSROOT} defined via pkg-config wrapper. > > When PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT is set, all paths included in pkg-config > output get prefixed with this value. > > Signed-off-by: