Hi,
Updated with feedback from mgorny: documenting TS_PV, using emake
to build objects, and using get_libname to fix so/dylib
confusion.
Thanks again,
Matthew
---
eclass/tree-sitter-grammar.eclass | 96 +++
1 file changed, 96 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
# David Seifert (2021-10-17)
# Broken since pretty much forever, last release 17 years ago, already
# removed by Fedora. Bug #386275, #731042, #762346, removal in 30 days.
media-sound/cdcd
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
# Hans de Graaff (2021-10-17)
# Obsolete package, replaced by dev-ruby/minitar.
# No reverse dependencies left. Masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-ruby/archive-tar-minitar
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
Please review tree-sitter-grammar.eclass - a new eclass for building
tree-sitter grammars provided by the tree-sitter developers.
The grammars are shipped as one or two source files and with no build
system. Upstream uses Gyp to build the grammars as a NodeJS module,
but they are useful
On Sun, 2021-10-17 at 11:42 +0100, Matthew Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review tree-sitter-grammar.eclass - a new eclass for building
> tree-sitter grammars provided by the tree-sitter developers.
>
> The grammars are shipped as one or two source files and with no build
> system. Upstream uses
On Sun, 2021-10-17 at 12:31 +0100, Matthew Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Updated with feedback from mgorny: documenting TS_PV, using emake
> to build objects, and using get_libname to fix so/dylib
> confusion.
>
> Thanks again,
> Matthew
>
> ---
> eclass/tree-sitter-grammar.eclass | 96
> On 18 Oct 2021, at 01:50, Sam James wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 14 Oct 2021, at 14:40, Marek Szuba wrote:
>>
>> Dear everyone,
>>
>> Following some private discussions, I feel quite strongly now that it would
>> both considerably improve certain processes and make our use of limited
>>
> On 14 Oct 2021, at 14:40, Marek Szuba wrote:
>
> Dear everyone,
>
> Following some private discussions, I feel quite strongly now that it would
> both considerably improve certain processes and make our use of limited
> manpower more efficient were we to further reduce the number of
We've reached the number of only 1000 EAPI=5 ebuilds left in the gentoo
repository today!
So, let's make that number go down further fast! :D Cheers!
--
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfri...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer
(council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice)
signature.asc
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 08:57:26PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> So, let's make that number go down further fast! :D Cheers!
What is the best way to help with that? Should I just grep for "EAPI=5"
in /var/db/repos/gentoo and submit a pr with an updated ebuild? Is the
new target EAPI 8?
-
On 2021-10-14 15:40, Marek Szuba wrote:
WDYT?
Could you please elaborate what you are expecting from this change?
I.e. will this solve any problem (please name it)? Will it allow us to
move forward where we are blocked at the moment (please name it)?
I am really curious what you are going
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 02:25:47AM +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> On 2021-10-14 15:40, Marek Szuba wrote:
> > WDYT?
>
> Could you please elaborate what you are expecting from this change?
>
> I.e. will this solve any problem (please name it)? Will it allow us to
> move forward where we are
From: "Robin H. Johnson"
Signed-off-by: Robin H. Johnson
---
.../2021-10-17-openssl-bindist-removal.en.txt | 38 +++
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
2021-10-17-openssl-bindist-removal/2021-10-17-openssl-bindist-removal.en.txt
diff --git
13 matches
Mail list logo
