On Tuesday 19 April 2005 10:51 pm, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 21:45, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
APR and APU are stand-alone and independent of apache, so there is no
need to p.mask those libs.
They do not coexist with the old apache2 properly as apache2 includes it's
own
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 03:32, Torsten Veller wrote:
The following packages are looking for a new home.
Right now they have no-herd and no maintainer:
app-admin/apg
i can take over this one.
my favorite one. :-)
--
voxus
:wq
pgpwEMsAlJmvx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:32:58AM +0200, Torsten Veller wrote:
app-admin/cpu
net-misc/bridge-utils
net-misc/netdate
I'll take these three, as I use them occasionally.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page : http://www.orbis-terrarum.net/?l=people.robbat2
ICQ#
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 09:36, Christian Parpart wrote:
And yeah, I disagree to a move-back, too!! I'm most likely not to
support this in any kind, instead, I'd be willing in pushing p.mask'ed
apache httpd 2.1 into the tree, so, that I don't have to live with the
old shitty behavior again.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Some people have experienced font slowdowns. This is because of a
/usr/share/fonts/fonts circular symlink that's a migration artifact. I
just committed a fix for it, but feel free to simply delete
Hello
app-doc/djbdns-man
net-dns/djbdns
net-nds/directoryadministrator
I'll look into taking over these if nobody else steps up.
Greets,
Michael
--
Gentoo Linux Developer using m0n0wall | http://hansmi.ch/
Hackers of the world, unite!
pgpF0WY1CFuyU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 01:32, Torsten Veller wrote:
net-dns/djbdns
If nobody wants this, I can take it, I'm using it on my systems.
--
Diego Flameeyes Pettenò
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64)
http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
pgpxxEGKXlQeY.pgp
Description: PGP
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
I think the only arch-specific ones I know on global are the
mmx/mmxex/mmx2/3dnow/3dnowex/sse flags.
Maybe also altivec?
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub more beer /dev/mouth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 08:27 am, Harald van Dk wrote:
Perhaps
make.conf.example (that's provided by portage, right?) should include
CBUILD, assuming it doesn't cause problems?
i'm afraid the possibility of users botching this makes it not worth the
effort
better to keep the definition of
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 09:52 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 08:27 am, Harald van Dk wrote:
Perhaps
make.conf.example (that's provided by portage, right?) should include
CBUILD, assuming it doesn't cause problems?
i'm afraid the possibility of users botching this
is the appropriate forum to ask about the uclibc stages?
thanks
jim
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
james osburn wrote:
is the appropriate forum to ask about the uclibc stages?
thanks
jim
I'd imagine the embedded mailing list would be.
http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/lists.xml
- --
Bork Bork Bork!
Aaron Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ BSD |
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 2:14 pm, Lance Albertson wrote:
Christian Parpart wrote:
And yeah, I disagree to a move-back, too!! I'm most likely not to support
this in any kind, instead, I'd be willing in pushing p.mask'ed apache
httpd 2.1 into the tree, so, that I don't have to live with the
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 10:59 am, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 09:36, Christian Parpart wrote:
And yeah, I disagree to a move-back, too!! I'm most likely not to
support this in any kind, instead, I'd be willing in pushing p.mask'ed
apache httpd 2.1 into the tree, so,
Christian Parpart wrote:
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 2:14 pm, Lance Albertson wrote:
Christian Parpart wrote:
And yeah, I disagree to a move-back, too!! I'm most likely not to support
this in any kind, instead, I'd be willing in pushing p.mask'ed apache
httpd 2.1 into the tree, so, that I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have in my bug list a rewrite of the fox packages written by Yaakov
(http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88924)
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88924%29. I want to spread
the word
and get some testing/comments for these before they go into
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
Is the modularization going to be handled much as the KDE splits were
handled? That is, as with KDE having both the multilithic (multi- due to
still having multiple category packages) and split ebuilds available for
3.4, will xorg
If the subject got your attention, then you might be interested :)
After a long time of fighting to keep versions and arch's in sync between
imagemagick (parent) and perlmagick (sub-atom), not too mention a few bugs
because of this separation, sekretarz and I have re-merged our efforts into a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am getting the following error while emerging
ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20050226-r3 on amd64
xvidff.c:682: error: `XVID_VOP_INTER4V' undeclared (first use in this
function)
xvidff.c:683: error: `XVID_VOP_HQACPRED' undeclared (first use in this
Vibhav Garg wrote: [Wed Apr 20 2005, 05:34:11PM EDT]
I am getting the following error while emerging
ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20050226-r3 on amd64
Vibhav, I brought up the question originally because Chris White is no
longer a developer. I think that problems merging ffmpeg should be
filed as bugs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lance Albertson wrote:
Why do you have to
push all these improvements on the current stable line of apache (2.0.x) ? Why
can't these changes just be used in the upcoming alpha/beta releases and
totally
be implemented by the time they move to the
[Cc'd -core in case some devs read that more]
Hi folks,
I've filed a bug[1] requesting that ebuilds with updated apache stuff
(anything using the new apache-module or depend.apache eclass/the new install
layout) be package.mask'd due to the regressions and breakages in testing. I
may have
22 matches
Mail list logo
