Re: [gentoo-dev] Another call for BugVoting on bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Stefan Schweizer
On 5/17/05, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 16 May 2005 08:01 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Mon, 16 May 2005 19:45:05 -0400 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Monday 16 May 2005 07:08 pm,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Another call for BugVoting on bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Thierry Carrez
Stefan Schweizer wrote: Many bugs in bugzilla have ebuilds contributed, the work is done, there is just no developer to add them to the tree and review them. Bugvoting would allow other developers to see where they can help. For example I am using kde but dont read all kde bugs, so if I would

Re: [gentoo-dev] Another call for BugVoting on bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Brian Harring
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 09:58:43AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Stefan Schweizer wrote: Many bugs in bugzilla have ebuilds contributed, the work is done, there is just no developer to add them to the tree and review them. Bugvoting would allow other developers to see where they can help.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Another call for BugVoting on bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread R Hill
On 5/16/05, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 16 May 2005 19:45:05 -0400 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | On Monday 16 May 2005 07:08 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | What, so that you can see which bugs a small but vocal group of | ricers are interested in rather than the ones

Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Michael Cummings
iawww, i thought that added extra emphasis to the post history... ;) On Monday 16 May 2005 08:41 pm, Jeffrey Forman wrote: Good eye, Fixed! -Jeffrey On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 09:25 +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote: Something's wrong with the i tags -- the one before Additional is never closed.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Subversion and Apache 2.0.54

2005-05-17 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Friday 13 May 2005 19:04, Ian Brandt wrote: Paul de Vrieze wrote: Quite likely you changed db versions along the run. While this theoretically should work. The best course of action is to dump the repository. Make sure you have a consistent use of db, and load the repository.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANNOUNCE] eclectic-0.9.1

2005-05-17 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Monday 09 May 2005 03:00, Marius Mauch wrote: Just put it as a subproject under base as it doesn't have the substance for a TLP, and I don't think azarah would mind it ;) It should be under the tools project. This is clearly a tool. Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL

Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Jonathan Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeffrey Forman wrote: Hey All, The upgrade for bugs.gentoo.org went exactly as I had planned for. Completed in under 20 minutes, which included this email. I've upgraded our Bugzilla from the old 2.18rc2 to 2.18.1. This fixes more security and

Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Alin Dobre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jonathan Smith wrote: I noticed a bug [1] which, when resolved after the upgrade, did not list the cause of resolution (in this case, it was a dup). Is this no longer required? I rather liked that feature, as it enabled people to see, at a

Re: [gentoo-dev] mysql-4.1.12 call for testers

2005-05-17 Thread Paul Waring
On 5/17/05, Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MySQL-4.1.12 is in the tree (hard-masked), and I would like lots of early testing. MySQL-4.0.24-r2 is also in the tree (hard-masked) for testing, and contains some of the improvements in the 4.1 ebuilds, like the new pkg_config, and the

Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 17/05/2005-16:04:20(+0300): Alin Dobre types -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jonathan Smith wrote: I noticed a bug [1] which, when resolved after the upgrade, did not list the cause of resolution (in this case, it was a dup). Is this no longer required? I

Re: [gentoo-dev] mysql-4.1.12 call for testers

2005-05-17 Thread Francesco Riosa
Lance Albertson wrote: Robin H. Johnson wrote: Many thanks to Francesco Riosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] for his hard work in dealing with MySQL-4.1. He's joining Gentoo soon as a new developer to help maintain MySQL for the 4.1 and 5.0 series, and hopefully also providing a package for the official

Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Jonathan Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Georgi Georgiev wrote: maillog: 17/05/2005-16:04:20(+0300): Alin Dobre types *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 12745 *** Here it is, the last row. But in the headers it says: Status: RESOLVED Resolution: right. what i

Re: [gentoo-dev] mysql-4.1.12 call for testers

2005-05-17 Thread Francesco Riosa
Paul Waring wrote: On 5/17/05, Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MySQL-4.1.12 is in the tree (hard-masked), and I would like lots of early testing. MySQL-4.0.24-r2 is also in the tree (hard-masked) for testing, and contains some of the improvements in the 4.1 ebuilds, like the new

Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Alin Dobre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jonathan Smith wrote: Georgi Georgiev wrote: maillog: 17/05/2005-16:04:20(+0300): Alin Dobre types *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 12745 *** Here it is, the last row. But in the headers it says: Status: RESOLVED Resolution:

[gentoo-dev] More bashrc usage

2005-05-17 Thread Chris White
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 While I was waiting for a package to compile, I worked on a new bashrc some. You can get the bashrc file from here: http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/bashrc to which you can stick it in /etc/portage/ if you want to use it. two main things it

Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Jonathan Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeffrey Forman wrote: [snip] Anything else I've forgotten, I will happily take full credit for. [snip] one more thing: comment #15 of bug 92622 [1] shows the bug which was a dup as marked through. perhaps this is intentional (resolved bugs show

Re: [gentoo-dev] mysql-4.1.12 call for testers

2005-05-17 Thread Paul Waring
On 5/17/05, Francesco Riosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't know if robbat2 need other testings but here it has been tested only on x86, at the moment there are no other archs avaiable for testing. If ebuilds exist for PPC (there appears to be one for 4.1.8-r1) then I'll be able to test it on

Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Jeffrey Forman
I've looked at the actual DB behind bugzilla, and that seems to be the only bug having that such situation, with a resolved-like status, but no resolution, all the other bugs look fine. *shrug* -Jeffrey On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 17:05 +0300, Alin Dobre wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Aaron Walker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeffrey Forman wrote: That seems odd, then again, those are VERY old bugs. Way before my time of looking at bugzilla to upgrade. Don't think it has anything to do with age. Just marked this one a dup this morning.

Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Jeffrey Forman
Bingo, I found the correlation between those bugs and the previous ones mentioned by Daniel. They have all been marked as duplicates of other bugs. Therefore bugzilla does not put a resolution in there, only marking them as status: resolved. -Jeffrey On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 11:19 -0400, Aaron

Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Jeffrey Forman
I retract my earlier statement. In the upgrade, I forgot to fully copy over all the resolution states. (Don't you just love that comfortable feeling that comes with editing a live system?) Now when a bug is marked as a duplicate it shows up as Status: RESOLVED Resolution: DUPLICATE of bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Michael Cummings
(fearing the jeff wrath) can we get the dup status added back in though? i know, i know, we're being nitpicky, and not too many folks have stood up and applauded this effort like they should have (ahem). Just...unsettling to see bugs marked as resolved - make it sound like i did something

Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Jeffrey Forman
Michael, You are very welcome, it was a pleasure to upgrade such a critical piece of Gentoo, even though it required time I could have spent outside in the Florida sun. As for your question about adding in the duplicate status. 'Duplicate' isn't a status, its a resolution state. I point

Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Michael Cummings
yeah, i hit send, then jforman hit send. sorry. On Tuesday 17 May 2005 12:42 pm, Michael Cummings wrote: (fearing the jeff wrath) can we get the dup status added back in though? i know, i know, we're being nitpicky, and not too many folks have stood up and applauded this effort like they

Re: [gentoo-dev] mysql-4.1.12 call for testers

2005-05-17 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 02:16:58PM +0100, Paul Waring wrote: On 5/17/05, Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MySQL-4.1.12 is in the tree (hard-masked), and I would like lots of early testing. MySQL-4.0.24-r2 is also in the tree (hard-masked) for testing, and contains some of the

Re: [gentoo-dev] i have an idea ! (erescue)

2005-05-17 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Gianelloni wrote: A much better approach would be for there to be a rescue build, completely independent of the stages, since it doesn't need to mirror them in any way. It should be extracted (self-extracted?) to something like /rescue and

Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeffrey Forman wrote: You are very welcome, it was a pleasure to upgrade such a critical piece of Gentoo, even though it required time I could have spent outside in the Florida sun. Heh, that explains why I spend so much time working on

Re: [gentoo-dev] mysql-4.1.12 call for testers

2005-05-17 Thread Alexander Simonov
Francesco Riosa wrote: Lance Albertson wrote: Robin H. Johnson wrote: Many thanks to Francesco Riosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] for his hard work in dealing with MySQL-4.1. He's joining Gentoo soon as a new developer to help maintain MySQL for the 4.1 and 5.0 series, and hopefully also providing a

Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Jan Kundrát
Donnie Berkholz wrote: Some of the new features are pretty sweet though, so thanks for doing it! Is it possible to add some feature which will allow end users to change timezone in which the times are reported? Or at least allow UTC? -jkt -- cd /local/pub more beer /dev/mouth

Re: [gentoo-dev] mysql-4.1.12 call for testers

2005-05-17 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 05:40:25PM +, Alexander Simonov wrote: It's all grate! But how about mysql 5 ? 5.0 will come later on (once Francesco is a dev). If you want it now, go and find Francesco's overlay. And wath about spliting mysq into mysql-server and mysql-client how it do like in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Another call for BugVoting on bugs.gentoo.org

2005-05-17 Thread Heinrich Wendel
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 10:13, Brian Harring wrote: On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 09:58:43AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Stefan Schweizer wrote: Many bugs in bugzilla have ebuilds contributed, the work is done, there is just no developer to add them to the tree and review them. Bugvoting

Re: [gentoo-dev] New dev Killerfox (Ren NussBaumer)

2005-05-17 Thread Michael Kohl
On Mon, 16 May 2005 19:36:41 +0200 Simon Stelling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nice to finally have you on board! Well, in his case I'm inclined to say it only was a matter of time. :) BTW: are you guys coming to What the Hack this summer? Would be nice to do something for the Austria-Swiss

Re: [gentoo-dev] multiple categories for a package

2005-05-17 Thread Marius Mauch
Alin Nastac wrote: Marius Mauch wrote: CVS doesn't support symlinks. But subversion does ;) Doesn't help here. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list