I may not have interpreted your message correctly. If I inferred something
from it that you didn't intend to convey, please clarify.
Developing the Portage software itself is an entirely different process than
creating an ebuild: unless you're planning to contribute enhancement code to
I saw the post by Joans and I decided to bring it up again.
About two months ago I came here wanting to become a developer,
since I'm a PHP programmer I came to Stuart asking him to by my mentor and help me get to know things before opening a developer bug for me.
Lately stuart was pretty busy
Adding my resume for those who are interested
www.omerc.net/O.Cohen-CV.en.doc
I don't think that posting your CV in doc format is a very good primer
step, isn't it?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
what's wrong with that? :/
On 6/5/05, aLeJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding my resume for those who are interested
www.omerc.net/O.Cohen-CV.en.docI don't think that posting your CV in doc format is a very good primerstep, isn't it?--gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
-- Thanks,Omer
El dom, 05-06-2005 a las 14:48 +0200, Omer Cohen escribi:
what's wrong with that? :/
The url is not working and therefore, it's not a very good idea to use
close text formats so as you can use rtf, pdf, html... Make things easy
and don't complicate them (it's only my opinion)
--
On Sunday 05 June 2005 13:48, Omer Cohen wrote:
what's wrong with that? :/
On 6/5/05, aLeJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding my resume for those who are interested
www.omerc.net/O.Cohen-CV.en.doc
http://www.omerc.net/O.Cohen-CV.en.doc
I don't think that posting your CV in doc format
I dropped the file since I thought there was somthing wrong with it, I'll put it back on right now as rtf.
www.omerc.net/O.Cohen-CV.en.rtf
enjoy
On 6/5/05, aLeJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El dom, 05-06-2005 a las 14:48 +0200, Omer Cohen escribió: what's wrong with that? :/The url is not working and
Omer Cohen *top-posted*:
what's wrong with that? :/
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
While, sure, OpenOffice _can_ read Word format, it's far from perfect at
doing so... and besides, we're in the business of promoting Open Source,
not pushing it to one side. ;-)
Also, can
Currently pam stuff (implementations, modules) are organized in the worst way
I ever seen.
Most of them are in sys-libs, some of them in app-admin, other in app-crypt,
pam_smb in net-misc and so on.
I think we should reorganize them and have a sys-pam category with
implementations (Linux-PAM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Currently pam stuff (implementations, modules) are organized in the worst way
I ever seen.
Most of them are in sys-libs, some of them in app-admin, other in app-crypt,
pam_smb in net-misc and so on.
I think we
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 16:22 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Currently pam stuff (implementations, modules) are organized in the worst way
I ever seen.
Most of them are in sys-libs, some of them in app-admin, other in app-crypt,
pam_smb in net-misc and so on.
I think we should
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 16:22 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Currently pam stuff (implementations, modules) are organized in the worst way
I ever seen.
Most of them are in sys-libs, some of them in app-admin, other in app-crypt,
pam_smb in net-misc and so on.
I think
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 21:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 25 May 2005 06:20 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote:
yes, it's finally that time ... after months of hearing us say 'we want to
get new baselayout stable asap', we're serious
last chance !
can someone forward the original
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
foser wrote:
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 18:34 +0200, Jonas Geiregat wrote:
I do agree with you but some package just have completely wrong place
within portage, such package placements migh confuse the user.
To give an example: mzscheme was placed in
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 13:50 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
Solar,
I realize you meant this as a general statement of opinion and not a
flame-baiter, but can you elaborate on:
On Sunday 05 June 2005 11:37, Ned Ludd wrote:
Invalidates binary package trees.
My (wrong?)
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 19:34 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Sunday 05 June 2005 17:37, Ned Ludd wrote:
I think they are fine where they are. Moving stuff around is a waste of
time. Makes things more complex. Makes more work on everybody.
Sorry but I don't agree with that, at least
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 13:25 -0400, Nathan L. Adams wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
foser wrote:
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 18:34 +0200, Jonas Geiregat wrote:
I do agree with you but some package just have completely wrong place
within portage, such package placements
Nathan L. Adams wrote:
Then why is their a browsable Categories link on the packages site?
http://packages.gentoo.org/categories/
Very good question , ..
I don't agree with Ned. Organizing the packages logically makes things
less confusing for the end-user and developers alike and
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 21:21 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Sunday 05 June 2005 21:03, Ned Ludd wrote:
14 files matching the pam prefix and 18 thing matching description.
You missed pam_ssh. And that's just an example.
By the way... mind telling everyone here how did you do that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ned Ludd wrote:
*poof* we now reshuffle, but then we can do auth with ldap. So lets
move
all the */ldap* related subjects under it sys-auth/... Then a month or
six later comes along sys-ldap and it gets moved there. The logic will
go full
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nathan L. Adams wrote:
Well obviously there needs to be a consensus on *how* to logically
organize things before anyone goes willy nilly changing stuff. Do you
group by what the package is used for (email vs. game vs. web browser)
or by what it is
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 04:22:10PM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
Currently pam stuff (implementations, modules) are organized in the worst way
I ever seen.
Most of them are in sys-libs, some of them in app-admin, other in app-crypt,
pam_smb in net-misc and so on.
I think we
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 17:44 +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
[snip]
it is a laborious work, but it could be done.
too bad we don't use subversion :(
I wonder if there is a svn interface to cvs, or if one could be written.
--
===
Mike Doty
Mike Doty wrote:
I wonder if there is a svn interface to cvs, or if one could be written.
rename/move is a feature of the svn database, not of the svn interface.
also support symlinks, btw.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
at the moment, there are 2 radius local useflags:
[+ C ] radius (net-dialup/ppp):
Enables RADIUS support
[+ C ] radius (net-misc/gnugk):
Enables radius support
but seems that net-misc/ser should also have such flag.
any objections?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Nothing wrong with having three packages with a local use flag. Global use
flags are for use flags with global appeal/usage. So far, to me it looks
like radius should stay a local use flag.
Michael Sterrett
-Mr. Bones.-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Alin Nastac wrote:
at the
Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote:
Nothing wrong with having three packages with a local use flag.
Global use
flags are for use flags with global appeal/usage. So far, to me it looks
like radius should stay a local use flag.
Enables RADIUS support isn't general enough for ya?
On Monday 06 June 2005 10:18, Alin Nastac wrote:
at the moment, there are 2 radius local useflags:
[+ C ] radius (net-dialup/ppp):
Enables RADIUS support
[+ C ] radius (net-misc/gnugk):
Enables radius support
but seems that net-misc/ser should also have such flag.
any
28 matches
Mail list logo
