On 05/07/05, Robert Paskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have encouraged gentoo to remove patent-encoumbered software from
portage. I'd like to see you personally work with only software that
does not contain any patented work.
No, I have encouraged Gentoo to remove software written by
On 05/07/05, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not being privvy to -core ( where I hear this was started and
subsequently moved to -dev ) I can only assume you didn't find what you
wanted on -core and are trolling for a decent response here.
Not being privy to -core either, I am wondering
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
twofourtysix wrote:
On 05/07/05, Jon Portnoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 06:59:24AM +0100, twofourtysix wrote:
uncensored, I'll accept that Gentoo as an organisation has no
influence over the content. Otherwise, by moderating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
twofourtysix wrote:
On 05/07/05, Robert Paskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have encouraged gentoo to remove patent-encoumbered software from
portage. I'd like to see you personally work with only software that
does not contain any patented
On Monday, July 04, 2005 11:19 pm, Jon Portnoy wrote:
I am wondering why we have anonymous trolls on this mailing list.
This is a public mailing list that doesn't use message filters.
--
Anthony Gorecki
Ectro-Linux Foundation
pgp3MElZoJB2f.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Anthony Gorecki wrote:
On Monday, July 04, 2005 10:14 pm, Stuart Longland wrote:
Why stop there? Why not extend it to hardware manufacturers that make
heavy use of patents?
Good luck finding a decent video card for that lovely desktop of yours. :-)
I'm still holding out hope that the open
twofourtysix wrote:
Not being privy to -core either, I am wondering about the apparently
hypocritical stance being taken on this issue.
I'm not sure if you caught the last few mails, but as stated, opinions posted on
the Planet/Blog/Bathroom Stall are simply _opinions_ of individual
On 7/5/05, Kumba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) This pointless debate will eventually die, because if it doesn't
I'm going to start quoting select excerpts from Vogon Poetry.
3) If the Vogon Poetry fails, I'll start reading excerpts from
Grunthos the
twofourtysix wrote:
On 05/07/05, Robert Paskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have encouraged gentoo to remove patent-encoumbered software from
portage. I'd like to see you personally work with only software that
does not contain any patented work.
No, I have encouraged Gentoo to remove
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 06:13 +0100, twofourtysix wrote:
Mostly, I was hoping that all those people who seem more than happy to
advocate something with *words* would be prepared to back them up with
*actions*. I think it's a shame that Gentoo is prepared to encourage
people to pester their
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 13:42 -0500, Brian D. Harring wrote:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 02:30:12PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 01 July 2005 02:11 pm, Brian D. Harring wrote:
Meanwhile, back to the you want us to add what?, our dependency
graph *is* incomplete.
so what ? i dont
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 10:09 +0100, twofourtysix wrote:
On 05/07/05, Patrick Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 06:13 +0100, twofourtysix wrote:
Mostly, I was hoping that all those people who seem more than happy to
advocate something with *words* would be prepared to
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 14:45 -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
Azarah wrote:[Sat Jun 18 2005, 07:23:19AM EDT]
You might however say install all gnuish tools with the 'g' prefix,
and then install wrapper scripts/stubs into say /usr/bin/gnu/ or
/bin/gnu/ (with /usr/bin/gnu/find calling gfind, etc),
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 11:25 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
A bit late I know, but just for interest sake .. virtuals is usually
used when more than one package usually provides the same compatible
api/tool ... which basically means pcmcia-cs and pcmciautils do the same
thing and cannot be
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 15:14 +1000, Stuart Longland wrote:
Good luck finding a decent video card for that lovely desktop of yours. :-)
Who needs video cards? My old VT-100 A4 terminal works just fine.
./Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 14:11 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 11:25 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
A bit late I know, but just for interest sake .. virtuals is usually
used when more than one package usually provides the same compatible
api/tool ... which basically
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 07:35 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
On that note.. Would you mind compiling it one time with a gcc built
with +boundschecking and then enabling CFLAGS+= -fbounds-checking as a
basic q/a check. Reason being that if nobody has ever included it
anywhere the chances of it being
First off, I'm going to ask that everyone please respond on gentoo-dev,
I am sending this to -core to try to catch everyone.
I am wanting to add dev-lang/perl to packages.build in default-linux.
Now, allow me to explain before you guys break out the torches and
pitchforks. The new current stable
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 07:35 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
On that note.. Would you mind compiling it one time with a gcc built
with +boundschecking and then enabling CFLAGS+= -fbounds-checking as a
basic q/a check. Reason being that if nobody has ever included it
anywhere the chances of it being
I want to add an ebuild for APC 3.0.0 (dev-php/PECL-apc) to portage but
am stuck with the following problem: APC 3.0.0 works with PHP 4.3.X and
PHP 5.1.X but not with PHP 5.0.X.
To block the installation of APC 3.0.0 with PHP 5.0.X I added the
following to the ebuild:
DEPEND=...
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 04:07 +0100, twofourtysix wrote:
Are these people prepared to back up their views by removing from the
tree all those ebuilds for software made by companies who make heavy
use of software patents? That would be far more effective, and may
even encourage a few mainstream
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 05 July 2005 04:21 pm, Stuart Herbert wrote:
1. The Gentoo package's maintainer will identify one *named* contact
UPSTREAM for security-related matters, and one named general contact
UPSTREAM (as a fallback for when the security contact is
unreachable).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Hi,
snip
1. The Gentoo package's maintainer will identify one *named* contact
UPSTREAM for security-related matters, and one named general contact
UPSTREAM (as a fallback for when the security contact is
Time for cleanups in Gentoo/FreeBSD.. we already disabled inetd building in
our latest ebuilds, but that isn't exactly sorted out for a reason: I don't
know how to deal with xinetd.
Let me summarize:
inetd is the old-unix-insecure implementation that it's usually used.
xinetd is a (drop-in?)
On Tue, 05 Jul 2005 21:21:35 +0100
Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to introduce the following security policy for web-based
apps. If there are no objections, every new web-based app will have
to conform to the policy before it can be added to the tree. Every
existing
Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 15:59 -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 01 July 2005 12:25 pm, Brian D. Harring wrote:
Currently, we pretty much leave out the big dogs of build depends from
ebuilds- basically we rely on the profile to
On Tuesday 05 July 2005 06:17 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
inetd is the old-unix-insecure implementation that it's usually used.
xinetd is a (drop-in?) replacement for it which is now used by quite
everyone who wants an inetd-style daemons.
you cant technically say it's a drop in since
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 01:23, Mike Frysinger wrote:
nothing should be using freetype ... i'll go ahead and delete that from
global since it shouldnt have been added in the first place
Doesn't this remember you of some dupe bugs of us? :P
--
Diego Flameeyes Pettenò
Gentoo Developer -
Hi all!
Short explanation for the subject: A *DEPEND mismatch is when a package
is listed in DEPEND, but missing in RDEPEND and vice versa. I have a
list of ebuilds at http://dev.gentoo.org/~swegener/qa/depend-mismatches
that contain such mismatches. I've already whitelisted packages like
On Tuesday 05 July 2005 08:00 pm, Sven Wegener wrote:
contains a lot of false positives. I can whitelist packages for DEPEND
or RDEPEND either general, based on eclass usage or for a specific
package. If you are sure that your package has a safe mismatch, I can
add it to the whitelist. But
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 02:12, Mike Frysinger wrote:
you should def whitelist for DEPEND only:
dev-util/cvs is used by vlc during build process (BDEPEND?)
Still there are a few other RDEPEND which makes sense to not be DEPEND,
especially for scripts.
--
Diego Flameeyes Pettenò
Gentoo
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 02:00:24AM +0200, Sven Wegener wrote:
[snip]
Could you possibly split the stuff into two files?
one for RDEPEND.only and one for DEPEND.only?
I see a lot more FP for RDEPEND.only.
Many of the RDEPEND.only are correct, as the packages are just scripts
that call other
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 18:17 -0500, Brian Jackson wrote:
Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 15:59 -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 01 July 2005 12:25 pm, Brian D. Harring wrote:
Currently, we pretty much leave out the big dogs of
Martin Schlemmer wrote:
snip
Big picture here:
* BDEPEND does nothing now, so don't worry about it if you don't want to
* in the future it will make other things possible
* give the man problems you see with the proposal, not just tell him that
portage doesn't handle it right now... I think out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
personally i'd support a doxinetd func that would check to see if xinetd is
installed rather than go with a USE flag ...
This kind of auto-enabling stuff is our bane upstream, so I don't see
that creating more of it ourselves
35 matches
Mail list logo
