Herbert Fischer posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sat, 16 Jul 2005 22:13:19 -0300:
All scripts created by Gentoo emerges have some header signature (sort of
cvs information), am I right?
If so, some sort of checking script can detect Gentoo signed files on
/etc/profile.d and
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:37:52AM +0100, Carlos Silva wrote:
Sorry to only reply to this now, but i saw a mail of you talking about
ndevfs. will that go into 2.6.13? not that i use devfs, 'cause i don't,
i'm just curious.
No, ndevfs was written in a bout of temporary insanity. I will not
On Sunday 17 July 2005 02:26, Mike Frysinger wrote:
this of course assumes that *no package* should ever install that file,
including your bsd libc ...
Actually, libiconv should install that file, at least.
We can RESTRICT it for just a package?
--
Diego Flameeyes Pettenò
Gentoo Developer -
Stuart Longland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Stelling wrote:
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Filtering the lists leads to a slippery slope. What happens when
you start getting false positives?
True, but why not filtering binary attachments? *If* you have to
send an attachment to these
Hey all,
It's that time again...the time you get to get up from your
chairs/couches/bathtubs and grab a drink from the fridge because I am
bringing down bugs.g.o for about 30 minutes at 2000UTC, give or take. I
am applying the 2.18.1 - 2.18.3 upgrade as evidenced by some recently
discovered and
Jeffrey Forman wrote:
Hey all,
It's that time again...the time you get to get up from your
chairs/couches/bathtubs and grab a drink from the fridge because I am
bringing down bugs.g.o for about 30 minutes at 2000UTC, give or take. I
am applying the 2.18.1 - 2.18.3 upgrade as evidenced by
Jeffrey Forman wrote:
Hey all,
It's that time again...the time you get to get up from your
chairs/couches/bathtubs and grab a drink from the fridge because I am
bringing down bugs.g.o for about 30 minutes at 2000UTC, give or take. I
am applying the 2.18.1 - 2.18.3 upgrade as evidenced by some
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 11:47:14AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
I absolutely agree, but I am not associated with them in any way and
therefore am not in a possition to convince them to reconsider their
versioning policy (unfortunately).
Why not just ask them? I've found that some people
Hi everyone,
I'm planning to edit the vpopmail ebuild Real Soon Now to add the
mysteriously missing postgres USE flag and thus end up with a
package compiled with the support we need.
Instead of wasting my time re-adding this every time a new version
of vpopmail comes along, I'd much rather
Craig Lawson wrote:
Comments?
This subject has also been brought up on the forum[1] very recently.
There have been some interesting ideas and alternatives posed that seem
workable. I was hoping some of the developers, if they have a moment,
could consider and critique these suggestions so
On Sunday 17 July 2005 12:03 pm, Ned Ludd wrote:
INSTALL_MASK is non cumulative.
Please use INSTALL_MASK=${INSTALL_MASK} /usr/lib/charset.alias as to not
override the user in anyway.
any harm with making it cumulative ? iirc, it takes just a few minor tweaks
to portage to declare it as such
On Sunday, July 17, 2005 9:26 pm, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
Do I simply mail a
patch to this list, or ask somebody for a CVS account and commit
changes directly?
Bugzilla: bugs.gentoo.org
I'm also a bit confused about the portdir_overlay thing - If there
exists a -r15, do I then add a -r16
Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
I'm planning to edit the vpopmail ebuild Real Soon Now to add the
mysteriously missing postgres USE flag and thus end up with a
package compiled with the support we need.
Instead of wasting my time re-adding this every time a new version
of vpopmail comes along, I'd
Hi Kids,
I have a lowly 500MhzG4 with 768MB Ram running OS X 10.4.2 and
portage online in case anyone wants a shell for testing, breaking, or
seeing why the macos team does some of the wacky things that they
do...if you've never logged into a Darwin machine, don't be shy, the
box is
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99120
Author: Jeremy Barton
The ccache permissions check incorrectly compares the directory's UID
against the portage GID. UID and GID of the portage are usually the
same but it is possible that they are not.
--
Jason Stubbs
diff -uNr
Author: Jason Stubbs
The permissions modifying code of ebuild.sh sets files to have group
wheel on BSD and Darwin and group root on other systems. The
intention is that the group have gid 0 on all systems. This code
removes the if block and uses the numerical identifier.
--
Jason Stubbs
diff
Hi all,
Just posted six patches. I guess some people are wondering why when
I'm the one that will apply them to CVS and release anyway. The
reason is that I'd like a second pair of eyes to look (as I am guilty
of releasing broken patches) and am thinking that it'll also help
people interested
17 matches
Mail list logo
