Mike Frysinger wrote:
also, four tabs rule
you are obviously wrong. three is the magic number ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
Hi,
Currently the files that accompany our release files (ISO images,
stages) are named in the following scheme:
*.asc for GPG signatures
*.md5 for MD5 sums
while the files that accompany our portage snapshots are named:
*.gpgsig for GPG
Hi,
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
I suggest we unify the naming scheme to the one currently in use by our
release files to avoid unnecessary confusion amongst our end-users -
unless of course there is a good reason for having different naming
schemes for release files and portage snapshots?
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 14:09, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote:
I have been thinking about this for the past few days, and haven't
been able to come up with an answer to why there isn't a man USE
flag for people to enable man pages getting installed.
FEATURES=noman disable man page
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 09:10 am, Michael Cummings wrote:
(not directed at dsd in particular, just the last one in my inbox
to reply :) That's great and all that its in features for the
installation, but what about packages with optional dependencies based
on doc and man?
in that case
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 15:16, Mike Frysinger wrote:
in that case we're screwed because there are plans to make people use
INSTALL_MASK and drop the FEATURES no{man,doc,info}
The problem is that noman and noinfo doesn't just avoid installing man pages
and info cru^Wstuff, they also avoid
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 12:46 +, Ferris McCormick wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 19:40 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Good catch. I was going to get to the rest of the GL headers after
getting Mesa working.
Another comment about Mesa.
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 22:19, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:10:39 -0400 Michael Cummings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| (not directed at dsd in particular, just the last one in my inbox
| to reply :) That's great and all that its in features for the
| installation, but what
Jason Stubbs wrote:
Personally, I think adding FEATURES to USE_EXPAND is terrible. Portage
features are not ebuild features. How much do you like C code that has
#ifdef's for the compiler being used? It's the same thing.
what wrong with #ifdef __cplusplus__? ;)
--
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64
OK guys, the beast is out...
GNAP is a Gentoo-based Network Appliance building system. It allows to
build LiveCDs or bootable disks with a customized network appliance
configuration in seconds. This is especially useful to quickly install
Gentoo on small-CPU hosts to use them as routers,
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 11:24 am, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 22:19, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:10:39 -0400 Michael Cummings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| (not directed at dsd in particular, just the last one in my inbox
| to reply :) That's great
maillog: 10/08/2005-17:14:59(+0200): Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò types
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 15:16, Mike Frysinger wrote:
in that case we're screwed because there are plans to make people use
INSTALL_MASK and drop the FEATURES no{man,doc,info}
The problem is that noman and noinfo doesn't
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 17:31, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Then please introduce TESTDEPEND, MANDEPEND and INFODEPEND instead.
TESTDEPEND!? Are there numbers how many packages are affected and what
dependencies are in question, which are usually not available on every box
anyways? This getting
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:06:30 +0200 Carsten Lohrke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| On Wednesday 10 August 2005 17:31, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| Then please introduce TESTDEPEND, MANDEPEND and INFODEPEND instead.
|
| TESTDEPEND!? Are there numbers how many packages are affected and
| what dependencies
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 18:06, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
TESTDEPEND!? Are there numbers how many packages are affected and what
dependencies are in question, which are usually not available on every box
anyways?
Just look at how much packages there are which has a test useflag to add
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 18:19, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Just look at how much packages there are which has a test useflag to add
dependencies. There are quite a few.
I counted 7 - seven - packages and toolchain-binutils.eclass. That's not even
a thousandth part of the tree. Come
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 01:07 pm, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 18:19, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Just look at how much packages there are which has a test useflag to
add dependencies. There are quite a few.
I counted 7 - seven - packages and
Ubuntu Breezy has also problems with the fixed font when I updated
it, the fonts.alias file is missing from the /usr/share/fonts/misc
directory, maybe it is the same problem that people are experiencing?
/ Per-Erik
tis 2005-08-09 klockan 11:16 -0700 skrev Donnie Berkholz:
Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ferris McCormick wrote:
| 2. But to get sparc assembler built correctly, the following patch
| seems correct:
Looks good to me.
| (Alternative is to create a complete linux-dri-sparc config file; I can
| do that if you like.)
No need if you don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Per-Erik Westerberg wrote:
| Ubuntu Breezy has also problems with the fixed font when I updated
| it, the fonts.alias file is missing from the /usr/share/fonts/misc
| directory, maybe it is the same problem that people are experiencing?
I've
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 19:26, Mike Frysinger wrote:
oh, you mean like portage ?
Eh? Of course in $D, not global. I see no reason for noman being feature
flag. Don't care about it though.
Carsten
pgpDy0C18phXB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 02:13 pm, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 19:26, Mike Frysinger wrote:
oh, you mean like portage ?
Eh? Of course in $D, not global. I see no reason for noman being feature
flag. Don't care about it though.
i mean your suggestion of adding it to
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 19:45, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
You didn't count very well... And you're only picking up the ones
Don't know what should be wrong with
find . -iname *\.ebuild -exec grep -H IUSE {} \; | grep test
that're using USE=test, not the ones that have unlisted test
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 02:25 pm, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 19:45, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
that're using USE=test, not the ones that have unlisted test
dependencies, forced optional dependencies or tests disabled to avoid
the dep.
I answered Diego. You put
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 21:04, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Doesn't solve the SRC_URI problem.
Point taken. Doesn't help that this expansion stuff is fugly, imho.
Carsten
pgpf2HCETwZ68.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 03:29 pm, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 21:04, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Doesn't solve the SRC_URI problem.
Point taken. Doesn't help that this expansion stuff is fugly, imho.
it is a bit on the fugly side but afaict, it's the best we got atm
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 10:53 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ferris McCormick wrote:
| 2. But to get sparc assembler built correctly, the following patch
| seems correct:
Looks good to me.
|
Just go ahead and commit it.
Done. It's not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
2005.1 has now been officially released and here's what you can expect
to find related to Hardened:
- - x86 stages for both the 2.4 and 2.6 kernel profiles [1]
- - expiremental amd64 non-multilib stages [2]
- - x86 SELinux stages for both
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 13:15 -0700, Duncan wrote:
Wow!
[snip]
Next time please ask yourself - is this e-mail really necessary?
./Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 8/10/05, Alin Nastac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
also, four tabs rule
you are obviously wrong. three is the magic number ;)
Who cares as long as they're tabs?
:set ts=3
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
| Ferris McCormick wrote:
| | Done. It's not quite right, yet, but it can now be worked with. For
| | sparc, we do not want a lot of ..._dri.so modules (even though that is
| | the target being used) because the kernel does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
--[PinePGP]--[begin]--
Ferris McCormick wrote:
| Done. It's not quite right, yet, but it can now be worked with. For
| sparc, we do not want a lot of
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 04:15 pm, Duncan wrote:
Eric Clapprood posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:53:25 -0400:
html xmlns:o=urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office
xmlns:w=urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word
xmlns=http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40;
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
Hi,
Currently the files that accompany our release files (ISO images,
stages) are named in the following scheme:
*.asc for GPG signatures
*.md5 for MD5 sums
while the files that accompany our portage snapshots are named:
*.gpgsig for GPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ferris McCormick wrote:
| I wrote the note very fast, and it was not too clear. With sunffb, the
| kernel code for current 2.6.x (x 6) is broken, and davem has taken dri
| support out of the xorg sunffb driver (to paraphrase him, you can't do
|
On Thursday 11 August 2005 00:31, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:24:54 +0900 Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| On Wednesday 10 August 2005 22:19, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:10:39 -0400 Michael Cummings
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| | (not
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 07:56 pm, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Thursday 11 August 2005 00:39, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 11:24 am, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 22:19, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:10:39 -0400 Michael Cummings
I know that portage team is closed for new features :) but this just
came to my mind just 5 minutes ago and seemed good enought to try.
Let's just think that portage handles 5 version of package foo and foo
has http://www.foo.org; and homepage, GPL-v2 license and foo just
make your pc look faster
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:04:25 +0100 Carlos Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| What do you think of this?
GLEP 5
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
pgpZjrHzgbbKe.pgp
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 01:15 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:04:25 +0100 Carlos Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| What do you think of this?
GLEP 5
*G* :) thx for the info
btw, why is the status of GLEP 5 timed out?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
--[PinePGP]--[begin]--
Ferris McCormick wrote:
| I wrote the note very fast, and it was not too clear. With sunffb, the
| kernel code for current 2.6.x
On Thursday 11 August 2005 02:04, Carlos Silva wrote:
[...]
What do you think of this?
I once asked for a better place (namely metadata.xml), but got corrected with
the following reason:
HOMEPAGE/LICENSE/DESCRIPTION might change over version bumps; not just the
revision/version number, also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Parpart wrote:
On Thursday 11 August 2005 02:04, Carlos Silva wrote:
[...]
What do you think of this?
I once asked for a better place (namely metadata.xml), but got corrected with
the following reason:
maillog: 09/08/2005-11:16:52(-0700): Donnie Berkholz types
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
| If you find bugs that aren't purely ebuild problems, do not file them at
| bugs.gentoo.org -- go to bugs.freedesktop.org, in the xorg product.
|
| Two USE flags you will care about are dri and glx -- both are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Georgi Georgiev wrote:
It seems that the current xorg-server installs all modules in
/usr/lib/xorg/modules. Any idea why? It used to be /usr/lib/modules
until recently, and that's still where opengl-update symlinks stuff to,
and also where vnc and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Georgi Georgiev wrote:
It seems that the current xorg-server installs all modules in
/usr/lib/xorg/modules. Any idea why? It used to be /usr/lib/modules
until recently, and that's still where opengl-update symlinks stuff to,
maillog: 10/08/2005-21:45:58(-0700): Donnie Berkholz types
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Georgi Georgiev wrote:
It seems that the current xorg-server installs all modules in
/usr/lib/xorg/modules. Any idea why? It used to be /usr/lib/modules
until recently, and that's still where opengl-update
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Georgi Georgiev wrote:
| What about new revisions of the monolithic xorg that will install in
| /usr/lib/xorg/modules followed by new revisions of all packages like
| opengl-update, nvidia, ati-whatever, that will depend on the newer xorg
| release?
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:04:25AM +0100, Carlos Silva wrote:
[snip]
or metadata.xml. This way, users with slow connections don't download
almost 1MB of info every time they sync.
Yes, your example occupies 1MB of space.
However, it does NOT equate to 1MB of bandwidth with each sync.
If you go
Mike Frysinger posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:58:09 -0400:
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 04:15 pm, Duncan wrote:
Eric Clapprood posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:53:25 -0400:
html
Kristian Benoit wrote:
Hi Jason and other folks,
I saw your last comment on http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73350
about most the these feature to be present in the next major version.
That is really great to read.
On that subject, I'd like to have an idea about when we should expect
Alec Warner wrote:
Is make.conf meant to be sourcable by bash and we can mark these bugs as
invalid, or do we need to modify the tools to process it and not source
the file.
I would prefer to keep make.conf sourceable unless there is some very
good reason not to. At present, it is essentially
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102073
Author: Zac Medico
Some refactoring could help make the emerge code more maintainable. I have
written a trivial patch that encapsulates the spinner code into an object.
This patch only reorganizes code and should not cause any regressions or
54 matches
Mail list logo
