subscribe
--
Josh M. Anders, MVP, MCSE+
Senior System Administrator
UNIX Expert
__
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org maili
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 18:24:46 +0200
Maurice van der Pot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this path going to be published somewhere or is this mail it?
As Francesco said he won't publish a guide somewhere and I think MySQl
is a widely used package, I decided to write up a little guide:
http://dev.g
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:21:30AM +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote:
>
> Is staking, poking out of the eyes and burning of hands considered a
> warm welcome? :-)
>
Must have missed a few memo's. I thought only YoswinK was allowed to do
this.
Welcome on board, rane.
Sven Vermeulen
--
Gentoo
On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 20:03 +0200, Francesco R wrote:
> Maurice van der Pot wrote:
>
> >Is this path going to be published somewhere or is this mail it?
> >
> >
> Not from me atm, I feel very bad at writing anglish documentation. An
> eventual reader sure feel worst.
>
> >On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 a
Maurice van der Pot wrote:
>Is this path going to be published somewhere or is this mail it?
>
>
Not from me atm, I feel very bad at writing anglish documentation. An
eventual reader sure feel worst.
>On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:08:06PM +0200, Francesco R wrote:
>
>
>>cmd# ebuild /var/db/pkg/d
Is this path going to be published somewhere or is this mail it?
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:08:06PM +0200, Francesco R wrote:
> cmd# ebuild /var/db/pkg/dev-db/mysql-4.1.14/mysql-4.1.14.ebuild config
This asks for a password, but not all passwords can be entered.
Specifically one with a ` in it fai
John Mylchreest wrote:
> In general, there is no obvious technical reason against individual
> installs differing from one another, however from a support and QA point
> of view it makes it a much less trivial issue.
Well, I was talking about <10 variants (one for each supported arch),
but iggy's
I'm not sure if I should do this, but the package lacks an maintainer.
It's currently hardmasked, it's API doc for another package (so it should be
better built and/or installed with +doc from that package), it's marked x86
and sparc.
For me, it should go away, but if someone has reasons for whi
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 10:18:58AM +0200, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
> The following does not apply to that case:
> > > Stuart has asserted that in those cases the arch team
> > > should be willing to take on the support burden for that package."
Oh, never mind, it does. If the currently stable ve
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 07:40:48PM -0600, Jason Wever wrote:
> Mostly us needing to stabilize sooner, but in some cases the opposite is
> true as well (for instance cases where it works for some but not
> others).
The following does not apply to that case:
> > Stuart has asserted that in those cas
10 matches
Mail list logo
