Okay, so if I have a servlet to deploy to an application container such as
tomcat, is there an eclass that I can use to inherit from?
Obviously the webapp eclass helps for straight apache-like deployments, but
it's not going to help much when deploying to tomcat.
I looked in
Dave Nebinger wrote:
Okay, so if I have a servlet to deploy to an application container such as
tomcat, is there an eclass that I can use to inherit from?
I don't think so.
Obviously the webapp eclass helps for straight apache-like deployments, but
it's not going to help much when
On 02/10/05, R Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The grub maintainer's stance was that reiser 4 support would not be
included in grub until it was included in gentoo-sources, not any kernel
in portage. The grub maintainer has been AWOL for the last 9 months or
so however, so i guess it's now up
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 03:07:23AM -0400, Dave Nebinger wrote:
So how do I get my war file deployed? Am I left to external tools such as ant
to manage that for me?
How does such an entity fit within the portage world?
Each J2EE server has its own method for deploying j2ee archives. I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Bainbridge wrote:
On 02/10/05, R Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The grub maintainer's stance was that reiser 4 support would not be
included in grub until it was included in gentoo-sources, not any kernel
in portage. The grub maintainer has
On 02/10/05, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Bainbridge wrote:
On 02/10/05, R Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still think it's retarded to have a reiser 4 boot partition, but
whatever stirs your pot. ;P
It makes sense if you're actually using reiser4 for everything else.
Why
Here is the package.mask entry explaining the situation:
# Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] (02 Oct 2005)
# Upstream is dead and does not compile against the latest swig.
# There are no packages using the library and there are better
# alternatives. Will be moved to java experimental if no-one
On 10/2/05, Chris Bainbridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02/10/05, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Bainbridge wrote:
On 02/10/05, R Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still think it's retarded to have a reiser 4 boot partition, but
whatever stirs your pot. ;P
It makes sense
Hi, I would just like some clarification if at all possible.
Recently, while testing bugzilla-2.18.4 for x86 (bug # 107796) I ran
into some interactivity. I was under the impression that emerge was
supposed to be completely autonomous, and any user interaction should
take place in ebuild ...
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 13:21:58 -0400 Dan Meltzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Recently, while testing bugzilla-2.18.4 for x86 (bug # 107796) I ran
| into some interactivity. I was under the impression that emerge was
| supposed to be completely autonomous, and any user interaction should
| take place
On 02/10/05, Dan Meltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/2/05, Chris Bainbridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02/10/05, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Bainbridge wrote:
On 02/10/05, R Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still think it's retarded to have a reiser 4 boot partition,
This is what I have found thanks to research of friendly people!
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/29810 (pkg_config
only interactive)
and, somewhere in dev manual it does say test can be interactive
also.. not sure about that though
On 10/2/05, Fernando J. Pereda [EMAIL
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:50:53PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
Also when FEATURES=test ? In such case the mod_php and php packages
are broken. They ask you to save, reject or send the result of the
tests if I'm not mistaken
Even if they succeed? The point of test is to get some additional
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:02:02PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| | Also when FEATURES=test ? In such case the mod_php and php packages
| | are broken. They ask you to save, reject or send the result of the
| | tests if I'm not mistaken
|
| Yup. There're quite a few broken test packages in the
2.10.2005, 20:13:52, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 08:01:08PM +0200, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
| On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:50:53PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
| Also when FEATURES=test ? In such case the mod_php and php packages
| are broken. They ask you to save,
The ready to cut ebuild at the bottom print it's environment (variable
and functions) to a bunch of files into /var/tmp/fakebuild/.
May be useful for who want to have a look at what and when is
avaible during the various emerge phases (but not limited to).
usage:
# env -i \
Chris Bainbridge posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sun, 02 Oct 2005 17:43:04 +:
On 02/10/05, Dan Meltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/2/05, Chris Bainbridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02/10/05, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Bainbridge wrote:
On
Well, I've been plugging along happily on constructing an ebuild for zimbra.
But because of a) their built-in hardwiring and b) ant-based build/install
system, my ebuild is starting to get pretty big and complex.
In order to keep my own thought patterns straight, I've isolated a lot of the
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 19:58:19 -0400 Dave Nebinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| a) are there limits to the size and/or complexity of the ebuilds that
| are accepted into portage?
Well...
* Whoever ends up maintaining said ebuild must understand it.
* Too much complexity is often a sign that you're
On Sunday 02 October 2005 08:08 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 19:58:19 -0400 Dave Nebinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| a) are there limits to the size and/or complexity of the ebuilds that
| are accepted into portage?
Well...
* Too much complexity is often a sign that
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 20:48:27 -0400 Dave Nebinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| So yeah, things are pretty complicated due to the upstream build
| system expectations.
I suggest hitting upstream with a cluebat until they make a proper
build system.
| 1. Can I use /usr/local/portage/eclass for
On Sunday 02 October 2005 09:28 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 20:48:27 -0400 Dave Nebinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| So yeah, things are pretty complicated due to the upstream build
| system expectations.
I suggest hitting upstream with a cluebat until they make a proper
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 12916 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
| On Thursday 29 September 2005 02:10 pm, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
|
|I was wondering if there's any chance of having the reiser4 patch for
|grub (or even the whole grub-reiser4 distfile) added to the ebuild.
|There are various
On Monday 03 October 2005 12:47 am, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:50:07 -0400 Dave Nebinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Their build system suits their purpose - distribute a LAMP-like
| system for the foundation of their web application. I'm sure it will
| keep them from
25 matches
Mail list logo
