The November Gentoo Council meeting will be held on #gentoo-council
Tuesday, November 15th, 20:00 UTC, presided by Seemant Kulleen.
The following items have been put on the agenda :
Voting
- GLEP 41 (requested by Homer Parker)
Discussion
- Portage Tree signing status (requested by Marius Mauch)
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 08:12:25 +0100 (CET)
Daniel Ahlberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14406 ebuilds.
Just FYI, it doesn't display correctly in Opera - I can provide screenshots if
you want.
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 22:34 +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 10:26 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
If users are interested in non-critical information, there's already a
mechanism in place for them to get such things. They can join the
mailing lists. Do we not already
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:25:33 +0100
Thierry Carrez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 22:37:15 + Stuart Herbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| For example, there's no real reason why GLSA's couldn't been
delivered | via this at some point (although I'd
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:09:24 +0100
Thierry Carrez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The November Gentoo Council meeting will be held on #gentoo-council
Tuesday, November 15th, 20:00 UTC, presided by Seemant Kulleen.
The following items have been put on the agenda :
Voting
- GLEP 41 (requested by
Thierry Carrez wrote: [Mon Nov 14 2005, 03:09:24AM CST]
Voting
- GLEP 41 (requested by Homer Parker)
My recollection was that GLEP 41 was rejected at the last
meeting, although a revised GLEP could be resubmitted for approval. As
far as I know, however, the GLEP has not yet been revised.
Marius Mauch wrote: [Mon Nov 14 2005, 08:05:44AM CST]
Discussion
- Portage Tree signing status (requested by Marius Mauch)
Ehm, I didn't request anything. Grant did ;)
Yep, I did make the request, but it is genone who did all of the hard
work. I'm just pushy. *Grin*
-g2boojum-
--
Grant
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 14:29 -0600, Grant Goodyear wrote:
Homer Parker wrote: [Fri Nov 11 2005, 08:09:11PM CST]
Just want to be sure that GLEP41 is on the list.
GLEP 41 was rejected by the council at the last meeting, pending a
rewrite that addressed the issues brought up at that
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 18:11 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:02:43 -0600 Homer Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| I uploaded it the end of last week. Looks to be updated on
| the web site.
Hrm, but you didn't post it to -dev for discussion?
If you wish, here
Grant Goodyear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thierry Carrez wrote: [Mon Nov 14 2005, 03:09:24AM CST]
Voting
- GLEP 41 (requested by Homer Parker)
My recollection was that GLEP 41 was rejected at the last
meeting, although a revised GLEP could be resubmitted for approval. As
far as I know,
Homer Parker wrote:
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 18:11 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:02:43 -0600 Homer Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| I uploaded it the end of last week. Looks to be updated on
| the web site.
Hrm, but you didn't post it to -dev for discussion?
Thierry Carrez wrote: [Mon Nov 14 2005, 10:28:23AM CST]
v 1.3 looks like a revised version to me (on Nov 11) :
http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/xml/htdocs/proj/en/glep/glep-0041.txt?r2=1.3root=gentoor1=1.2diff_format=u
Hmmm, I'm not sure how I missed that one, but clearly I did. Did
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 13:06 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
Sending it out a day before the meeting isn't exactly a good thing.
I'd
rather wait to look through those details instead of getting them a
day
before they vote on them.
I got busy and forgot to post it to the list. If it
Hi,
I wanted to announce that the science herd took on its first herd tester
(Lucas Chiesa (tulku)) nearly a month ago. We also have a few others in the
pipeline. Due to the technical nature of some of the scientific packages we
felt that herd testers would be especially appropriate for the
On Monday 14 November 2005 23:17, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:38:28 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The cache and elog plugin selection(s) come from user settings but
emaint (and repoman whenever that happens (and possibly even emerge
itself one day?)) needs to
On Monday 14 November 2005 00:46, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Sunday 13 November 2005 11:52, Brian Harring wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 09:19:55AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Sunday 13 November 2005 04:00, Brian Harring wrote:
*cough* that's that funky _p1 you're using there? :)
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:24:02 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 14 November 2005 00:46, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Sunday 13 November 2005 11:52, Brian Harring wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 09:19:55AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Sunday 13 November 2005 04:00, Brian
On Tuesday 15 November 2005 00:32, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:24:02 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 14 November 2005 00:46, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Sunday 13 November 2005 11:52, Brian Harring wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 09:19:55AM +0900, Jason
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 04:32:35PM +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Monday 14 November 2005 00:46, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Replace 2.1.0 with 2.2.0 and I'll agree.
Skipping 2.1 accomplishes what?
People asking, whoah there, it's a later version then 2.1, where's
the 2.1 functionality? will still
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 10:38:28PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Sunday 13 November 2005 11:57, Brian Harring wrote:
?? filenames.
OT, but return of the funky 'A's...
Curious if others are seeing it, or if my nano/mutt setup just plain
sucks.
* portage.py edits to the config class to make
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 01:13:58AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Was talking with a guy yesterday who mentioned he had 10 line patch that sped
up current portage a lot with regard to updating metadata. I asked him to
send it to me and here it is:
--- -??2005-10-29 18:49:15.156173000 +0900
On 05/11/14 09:53, Brian Harring wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 10:38:28PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Sunday 13 November 2005 11:57, Brian Harring wrote:
 filenames.
OT, but return of the funky 'A's...
Curious if others are seeing it, or if my nano/mutt setup just plain
sucks.
I
Hola all.
Wrote another confcache implementation (this time not bound to ebd
thank god), and stuck an ebuild and portage patch for it in
http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/confcache/ .
Should be a bit stricter then the 2.1 implementation; for those not
aware of what it is, it's a global autoconf
23 matches
Mail list logo
