Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X porting: dependency changes

2005-12-07 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: | As far as progress on this issue, we're looking into adopting glep 37 | and creating a virtual/x11 ebuild to address this. I've just committed virtual/x11 to the tree. See https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112896 if

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X porting: dependency changes

2005-12-07 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 17:03, Donnie Berkholz wrote: Donnie Berkholz wrote: | As far as progress on this issue, we're looking into adopting glep 37 | and creating a virtual/x11 ebuild to address this. I've just committed virtual/x11 to the tree. See

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Manifest2 format

2005-12-07 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 04:04, Marius Mauch wrote: As stated in the GLEP, gpg is outside the scope of this. As for the questions, per entry sigs would invert one of the main goals (size reduction). And so far I haven't seen any sufficient answer to questions I raised on -core and

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Manifest2 format

2005-12-07 Thread Marius Mauch
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 16:15:49 +0100 Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 07 December 2005 04:04, Marius Mauch wrote: As stated in the GLEP, gpg is outside the scope of this. As for the questions, per entry sigs would invert one of the main goals (size reduction). And so far I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X porting: dependency changes

2005-12-07 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jason Stubbs wrote: | On Wednesday 07 December 2005 17:03, Donnie Berkholz wrote: | |Donnie Berkholz wrote: || As far as progress on this issue, we're looking into adopting glep 37 || and creating a virtual/x11 ebuild to address this. | |I've just

[gentoo-dev] Getting your apps ported to modular X

2005-12-07 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm planning on porting every installed app on my system to modular X, starting in the next couple of days. This means I will be committing to many of your applications, libraries, etc. If you don't trust my ability to do this or otherwise don't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting your apps ported to modular X

2005-12-07 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: | I'm planning on porting every installed app on my system to modular X, | starting in the next couple of days. This means I will be committing to | many of your applications, libraries, etc. | | If you don't trust my ability

Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting your apps ported to modular X

2005-12-07 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 11:27 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: | I'm planning on porting every installed app on my system to modular X, | starting in the next couple of days. This means I will be committing to | many of your

Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting your apps ported to modular X

2005-12-07 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 11:18:58 -0800 Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | I'm planning on porting every installed app on my system to modular X, | starting in the next couple of days. This means I will be committing | to many of your applications, libraries, etc. So is there now a safe,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting your apps ported to modular X

2005-12-07 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: So is there now a safe, correct way of specifying modular X dependencies that will actually work? It will work when I pull the virtual/x11 from base/virtuals this weekend. Until then, it will wrongly think xorg-x11-7 ebuilds provide the virtual. See my recent post on

Re: [gentoo-dev] http://people.gentoo.org/

2005-12-07 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Tuesday 06 of December 2005 23:28 Doug Goldstein wrote: Yeah so... I don't really know what your last name means... Only thing close that I see is female repoductive organ but of the 4 letter variation. I dunno... Lemme know... maybe even off list.. :-D Bingo, I see you already know all the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting your apps ported to modular X

2005-12-07 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Donnie Berkholz wrote: For your benefit, here's my world file. You can determine whether your app's in the list by replacing yours with it, then running 'emerge -ep world'. It was pointed out that I worded this poorly. Rather than replacing, you should back up your own file, copy mine in,

[gentoo-dev] December Council Meeting

2005-12-07 Thread Mike Frysinger
this is your [belated] reminder of the December council meeting. future reminders will not be late anymore ... we've proven that we cant remember it so i've gone ahead and crontab-ed future reminders to go out on the first :) current agenda: none ?! -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Looking for a vile maintainer

2005-12-07 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
Anyone (existing developers only please, I'm not recruiting) use vile? If so, congratulations. You just volunteered to maintain it, starting with bug #114178. You can join the Vim herd (which seems to own all the vi clones for some bizarre reason) or maintain it separately if you prefer. --

Re: [gentoo-dev] December Council Meeting

2005-12-07 Thread Marius Mauch
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 23:49:59 + Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this is your [belated] reminder of the December council meeting. future reminders will not be late anymore ... we've proven that we cant remember it so i've gone ahead and crontab-ed future reminders to go out on the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Looking for a vile maintainer

2005-12-07 Thread Albert Hopkins
LOL. Sorry, subject line gave me the chuckles. -m -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Looking for a vile maintainer

2005-12-07 Thread Michael Crute
On 12/7/05, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone (existing developers only please, I'm not recruiting) use vile? If so, congratulations. You just volunteered to maintain it, starting with bug #114178. You can join the Vim herd (which seems to own all the vi clones for some bizarre

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] .53, .54 and beyond...

2005-12-07 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 11:57, Marius Mauch wrote: On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 08:41:27 +0900 Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 07 December 2005 01:01, Marius Mauch wrote: On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 23:19:38 +0900 Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If there's no solid

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] DepSet

2005-12-07 Thread Zac Medico
Zac Medico wrote: 1) Save test_conditionals.py in your PYTHONPATH as portage/test/ebuild/test_conditionals.py 2) Run `trial portage.test.ebuild` and watch it fail. 3) Apply DepSet-AndRestriction.patch then watch the previous test succeed. 4) Run vdb-depset-test.py to try it on your whole