Attached is a draft of a glep for formalizing multiple-repository support
This is far from ideal in many ways, but i'm too tired and I drank too
much caffine to be sane.
Also, i have no clue how to use docutils so i just tried my best.
(** is my way of doing another level of bullets, please
I apologize for the caps in the subject.
Andrew Muraco
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html
I like it - well done Marius.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Crypto/PPC/dev-embedded/Forensics/NetMon
pgpD3JojbdJir.pgp
Description: PGP signature
When you are interested in sim and willing to fix all bugs¹ and takeover
maintainership) speak now. Christmas morning I'll crucify it.
Carsten
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110241
pgplrITLoIEF7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Zac Medico wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
except that it moves it deeper down into the how
do I determine whether this news item is relevant? area. And the only
way to get around that would be to move even more code into Portage
than you're already proposing.
Are the currently specified
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 12:38:24 -0800 Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Looking into this a little further, it seems that
| Display-If-Installed can be implemented with `portageq match /
| atom` and Display-If-Keyword can be implemented with `portageq
| envvar ARCH`. That leaves
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Well, that depends... If you have sys-apps/foo installed from the
gentoo-x86 repository, and the breakmygentoo repository issues a news
item about sys-apps/foo, should it be displayed?
Well, probably not. Off hand, perhaps portageq could provide a query that
returns
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:16:04 -0800 Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| Well, that depends... If you have sys-apps/foo installed from the
| gentoo-x86 repository, and the breakmygentoo repository issues a
| news item about sys-apps/foo, should it be displayed?
|
|
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 09:21:45PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:16:04 -0800 Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| Well, that depends... If you have sys-apps/foo installed from the
| gentoo-x86 repository, and the breakmygentoo repository
Pardon bluntness; don't mean offense, just specifically picking the
hell out of this proposal to make a point (lucky you) :)
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 03:17:44AM -0500, Andrew Muraco wrote:
Attached is a draft of a glep for formalizing multiple-repository support
I appreciate trying to chip in,
Hey all,
Here is a fix for libXt, similar to the problems I had with libX11
last week. I don't see an obvious way to patch the Makefile.am.
Please send comments.
Symptom:
../util/makestrs -i .. ../util/string.list StringDefs.c
/bin/sh: ../util/makestrs: cannot execute binary file
make[2]:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:54:06PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:48:45 -0800 Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I wish you'd reconsider, because I was looking forward to multiple
| repository support.
Well, if Portage ever gets multiple repository support, then news
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 11:25:58PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:15:48 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| True stand alone repository capabilities aren't required/bound to
| glep42, all that's required out of glep42 is that the syncing repo id
| be used now
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:14:15 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| What remaining straw men are there for ignoring the portage
| developers requests?
Asking you to specify how multiple repositories will work before I try
to extend the GLEP to support multiple repositories is hardly a
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:01:59 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Do you need to know how every bit of a car works to drive it? No.
No, but I do need to know whether it has manual or automatic gears, and
where the steering wheel is.
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 01:07:27AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:51:05 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Transitioning from single news.unread to N is going to break clients
| that expect a single.
Yup.
| As I said, you're going to break stuff- and
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 01:08:31AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:01:59 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Do you need to know how every bit of a car works to drive it? No.
No, but I do need to know whether it has manual or automatic gears, and
where the
Here we go again... Changes:
* We're now supporting overlays, multiple repositories and magic flying
chickens. To do this, we're shoving a whole load of new requirements
onto Portage. Said requirements are documented under `Required Portage
Enhancements`_. I now expect to get heavily flamed by a
I agree with ciaranm (did I really just say that?) that repository IDs should
not be allowed to contain spaces.
--
Andrew Gaffneyhttp://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/
Gentoo Linux Developer Installer Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Not that my lowly user opinion matters, but I agree with ciaranm that
repository IDs should not be allowed to contain spaces
GLEP 42 wrote:
* Before an ``emerge --ask target`` sequence
What, exactly, does this mean? I'm guessing it means between the package list
and the prompt, but it's not
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 20:50:43 -0800 John Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| GLEP 42 wrote:
| * Before an ``emerge --ask target`` sequence
| What, exactly, does this mean? I'm guessing it means between the
| package list and the prompt, but it's not quite clear.
I dunno, I refuse to use emerge --ask
On Saturday 17 December 2005 20:57, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 20:50:43 -0800 John Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| GLEP 42 wrote:
| * Before an ``emerge --ask target`` sequence
|
| What, exactly, does this mean? I'm guessing it means between the
| package list and the
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 04:15:45AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Here we go again... Changes:
* We're now supporting overlays, multiple repositories and magic flying
chickens. To do this, we're shoving a whole load of new requirements
onto Portage. Said requirements are documented under
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:50:47 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Drop the magic-chicken crap (especially in light of your comments
| about 'professional' news inline in the glep).
Eh, there aren't any magic chickens in the glep.
| Not really. Just requires your code to be space
24 matches
Mail list logo
