[gentoo-dev] [SEMI-OFF-TOPIC] PSU for a Cobalt Qube 2

2005-12-19 Thread Gustavo Felisberto
I just received a Cobalt Qube 2 .It only has 16 mb of ram but i'm working on getting more memory. But the unit cammed with now PSU so i am hunting for one of these: 1- A Working PSU 2- A non working psu (to use the connector) and pinout of the psu 3- The pinout of the psu so i can hack another

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites for net-im/sim

2005-12-19 Thread George Shapovalov
Ugh, it is the only one that reliably connects to icq (yea, I am stuck using it for many people whom I contact as this is pretty much the only protocol honored there) *and* handles various encodings in a sane way (no, gaim, while been really nice on a protocol side, does not cut it on

[gentoo-dev] Binary packages in the tree

2005-12-19 Thread Mark Loeser
Currently we are forcing people to either have gcc-3.3 installed, or libstdc++-v3 so that old packages that weren't recompiled yet don't break, and binary packages that need libstdc++.so.5 don't break horribly as well. I'd like to see this dependency in the gcc ebuilds go away and all of the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Binary packages in the tree

2005-12-19 Thread Mark Loeser
Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: So, everyone that has a binary package in the tree, I would appreciate it if you could put the sys-libs/libstdc++-v3 depend into your package if necessary. Well, you can tell I didn't exactly think about this too much beforehand, since its been brought to my

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-12-19 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13634 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Binary packages in the tree

2005-12-19 Thread Alin Nastac
Mark Loeser wrote: Well, you can tell I didn't exactly think about this too much beforehand, since its been brought to my attention a virtual would probably be best for this, so we would handle the || ( gcc-3.3.* libstdc++ ) inside of the virtual. I'll make one later unless anyone has strong

Re: [gentoo-dev] December 15th Meeting Summary

2005-12-19 Thread Marius Mauch
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:47:21 -0500 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this months meeting wasnt too eventful, kind of quiet ... on the agenda: - Marius: decision on multi-hash for Manifest1 there was a bit of hearsay about why the council was asked to review/decide on this issue since

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites for net-im/sim

2005-12-19 Thread Olivier Crete
On Mon, 2005-19-12 at 12:19 +0100, George Shapovalov wrote: Ugh, it is the only one that reliably connects to icq (yea, I am stuck using it for many people whom I contact as this is pretty much the only protocol honored there) *and* handles various encodings in a sane way (no, gaim, while

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites for net-im/sim

2005-12-19 Thread Stephen P. Becker
George Shapovalov wrote: Ugh, it is the only one that reliably connects to icq (yea, I am stuck using it for many people whom I contact as this is pretty much the only protocol honored there) *and* handles various encodings in a sane way (no, gaim, while been really nice on a protocol side,

Re: [gentoo-dev] December 15th Meeting Summary

2005-12-19 Thread Alec Joseph Warner
Marius Mauch wrote: On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:47:21 -0500 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this months meeting wasnt too eventful, kind of quiet ... on the agenda: - Marius: decision on multi-hash for Manifest1 there was a bit of hearsay about why the council was asked to review/decide

Re: [gentoo-dev] Binary packages in the tree

2005-12-19 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Loeser wrote: | Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: | |So, everyone that has a binary package in the tree, I would appreciate it if |you could put the sys-libs/libstdc++-v3 depend into your package if |necessary. | | | Well, you can tell I

Re: [gentoo-dev] December 15th Meeting Summary

2005-12-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 06:37:16PM +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:47:21 -0500 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: there was a bit of hearsay about why the council was asked to review/decide on this issue since we werent able to locate any portage devs at the time of

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites for net-im/sim

2005-12-19 Thread George Shapovalov
Well, I cannot say anything about msn, as I have nobody using it. As for icq, good for you then :). I am hitting that famous login bug - just cannot login whether I use either of the standard login sites (are there any more?).. I should admit though, things have improved somewhat. Now, with

Re: [gentoo-dev] December 15th Meeting Summary

2005-12-19 Thread Marius Mauch
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 13:45:04 -0500 solar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you do that please set it as a blocker for the .54 release. Reintroducing ChangeLog/metadata.xml to Manifests would be a undesired regression. Nothing in the portage as of =.53 make direct use of those two files and there

[gentoo-dev] Viability of other SCM/version control systems for big repo's

2005-12-19 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I know some of you have done research on how gentoo-x86 converts over to other systems besides CVS such as SVN, arch, etc. But I can't find the info anywhere in my archives. Could whoever's got it, post it? I'm particularly interested in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Viability of other SCM/version control systems for big repo's

2005-12-19 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:44:24 -0800 Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | I know some of you have done research on how gentoo-x86 converts over | to other systems besides CVS such as SVN, arch, etc. But I can't find | the info anywhere in my archives. | | Could whoever's got it, post it? The

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites for net-im/sim

2005-12-19 Thread George Shapovalov
Thanks, I'll try, but seeing gnome in the name I am quite skeptical. It's really nothing personal. Its just in my experience gnome/gtk apps could never handle cyrillic well enough in all situations.. Yea, cyrillic is a bitch. Its probably worse than chineese, no really :). These guys were

Re: [gentoo-dev] Viability of other SCM/version control systems for big repo's

2005-12-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:04:19PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:44:24 -0800 Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | I know some of you have done research on how gentoo-x86 converts over | to other systems besides CVS such as SVN, arch, etc. But I can't find | the

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites for net-im/sim

2005-12-19 Thread Olivier Crete
On Mon, 2005-19-12 at 21:08 +0100, George Shapovalov wrote: Thanks, I'll try, but seeing gnome in the name I am quite skeptical. It's really nothing personal. Its just in my experience gnome/gtk apps could never handle cyrillic well enough in all situations.. Yea, cyrillic is a bitch. Its

Re: [gentoo-dev] Viability of other SCM/version control systems for big repo's

2005-12-19 Thread Patrick Lauer
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 11:44 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: Hi all, I know some of you have done research on how gentoo-x86 converts over to other systems besides CVS such as SVN, arch, etc. But I can't find the info anywhere in my archives. Could whoever's got it, post it? I'm

Re: [gentoo-dev] Viability of other SCM/version control systems for big repo's

2005-12-19 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:17:56 +0100 Patrick Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | I've only tried svn with the cvs2svn script. | Importing with history took ~8h on a 500Mhz box (which surprised me | because I had heard it takes days). Doing checkouts caused about the | same load as cvs, but I have no

Re: [gentoo-dev] Viability of other SCM/version control systems for big repo's

2005-12-19 Thread Fernando J. Pereda
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:17:56PM +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote: | http://www.keltia.net/EuroBSDCon/slides.pdf has some performance data on | mercurial for FreeBSD, roughly the same size as the Gentoo cvs | repositories. It's not the size of the repo what matters... it is the workflow. I don't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Viability of other SCM/version control systems for big repo's

2005-12-19 Thread Patrick Lauer
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 21:23 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:17:56 +0100 Patrick Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | I've only tried svn with the cvs2svn script. | Importing with history took ~8h on a 500Mhz box (which surprised me | because I had heard it takes days). Doing

[gentoo-dev] Changing description for the xml global use flag

2005-12-19 Thread Petteri Räty
/usr/portage/profiles/use.desc:xml - Check/Support flag for XML library (version 1) I think the xml use flag should be more generic. There are after all other alternatives for xml support than dev-libs/libxml. Maybe something like Adds xml support? Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing description for the xml global use flag

2005-12-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 11:48:52PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote: /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc:xml - Check/Support flag for XML library (version 1) I think the xml use flag should be more generic. There are after all other alternatives for xml support than dev-libs/libxml. Maybe something

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing description for the xml global use flag

2005-12-19 Thread Petteri Räty
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 11:48:52PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote: /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc:xml - Check/Support flag for XML library (version 1) I think the xml use flag should be more generic. There are after all other alternatives for xml support than

Re: [gentoo-dev] Viability of other SCM/version control systems for big repo's

2005-12-19 Thread Chris Bainbridge
On 19/12/05, Peter Johanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or maybe not, I dunno. The point being I don't think we should immediately write off any of the distributed SCMs without pondering how they might make a difference or be usable. It would be very useful for people who aren't devs but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing description for the xml global use flag

2005-12-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:19:01AM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 11:48:52PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote: /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc:xml - Check/Support flag for XML library (version 1) I think the xml use flag should be more generic. There

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing description for the xml global use flag

2005-12-19 Thread Lares Moreau
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 00:19 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/test/java $ qgrep -v IUSE | grep xml2 | grep -e xml[^2] dev-tcltk/tclxml/tclxml-3.0.ebuild: IUSE=expat threads xml2 media-libs/libwmf/libwmf-0.2.8.3-r1.ebuild: IUSE=jpeg X xml xml2 debug doc gtk

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing description for the xml global use flag

2005-12-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 04:04:55PM -0700, Lares Moreau wrote: On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 00:19 +0200, Petteri R?ty wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/test/java $ qgrep -v IUSE | grep xml2 | grep -e xml[^2] dev-tcltk/tclxml/tclxml-3.0.ebuild: IUSE=expat threads xml2

Re: [gentoo-dev] [SEMI-OFF-TOPIC] PSU for a Cobalt Qube 2

2005-12-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:51:08AM +, Gustavo Felisberto wrote: 3- The pinout of the psu so i can hack another solution here's what mine says: AC ADAPTER ZVC36FS12 50-60Hz 12V 3.0A EOS Corp you might be able to google up something -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Viability of other SCM/version control systems for big repo's

2005-12-19 Thread Kalin KOZHUHAROV
Chris Bainbridge wrote: On 19/12/05, Peter Johanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or maybe not, I dunno. The point being I don't think we should immediately write off any of the distributed SCMs without pondering how they might make a difference or be usable. It would be very useful for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing description for the xml global use flag

2005-12-19 Thread Marius Mauch
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:19:01 +0200 Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 11:48:52PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote: /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc:xml - Check/Support flag for XML library (version 1) I think the xml use flag should be more

Re: [gentoo-dev] December 15th Meeting Summary

2005-12-19 Thread Brian Harring
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 01:45:04PM -0500, solar wrote: So right now I'll go ahead and add the pycrypto code to portage, but will not yet add the dep to any ebuild or change anything metadata.xml or ChangeLog related (according to Jason 2.0.54 is still away one or two weeks anyway). If

Re: [gentoo-dev] Viability of other SCM/version control systems for big repo's

2005-12-19 Thread Chandler Carruth
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 09:17:56 +0900 Kalin KOZHUHAROV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | As far as speed is concerned, it is comparable with CVS. Be more specific please. We're looking for benchmarks showing how well it performs in terms of speed, bandwidth and memory usage for

[gentoo-dev] Re: Changing description for the xml global use flag

2005-12-19 Thread Duncan
Petteri Räty posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:19:01 +0200: Mike Frysinger wrote: then you'd have to deprecate the usage of xml2 is there any package which uses both xml and xml2 ? if not, i dont see why we cant condense the two down into one -mike

[gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] making the tree depend on portage

2005-12-19 Thread Marius Mauch
Ok, the subject might be confusing, so let me explain this a bit: Whenever we want/need to make structural changes to the tree that are going to break backwards compability we have a serious problem (see GLEP 44 in case you don't know about it). To reduce the impact of that problem I've got the