[gentoo-dev] Re: $BUILDDIR in ebuilds

2005-12-25 Thread Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
Like in here? app-doc/halibut/halibut-0.9.ebuild: BUILDDIR="${S}/build" \ net-dns/maradns/maradns-1.0.27.ebuild:BUILDDIR=${S}/build \ net-dns/maradns/maradns-1.0.32.ebuild:BUILDDIR=${S}/build \ Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, 2

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-12-25 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14140 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stupid USE defaults that need cleaning

2005-12-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 26 December 2005 02:24, Doug Goldstein wrote: > well there is always USE enabling... (i.e. When I emerge x11-libs/qt, > it'll turn on the "qt" USE flag) which we've already established quite clearly as something we wish to get rid of completely -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing li

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stupid USE defaults that need cleaning

2005-12-25 Thread Doug Goldstein
Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 26 December 2005 00:09, Doug Goldstein wrote: > >>the USE defaults are a bit INSANE... We need to get rid of some of this >>crap... > > > not really a useful endeavor unless we get something like per-package USE > defaults > > everyone has their own opinion as

[gentoo-dev] $BUILDDIR in ebuilds

2005-12-25 Thread Brian Harring
Hola all. Just sending a notice/reminder that ebuilds should not be using $BUILDDIR directly- especially since vapier just commited a rename of that var. ~harring pgpunxuTIS1nk.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stupid USE defaults that need cleaning

2005-12-25 Thread Dale
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 26 December 2005 00:09, Doug Goldstein wrote: the USE defaults are a bit INSANE... We need to get rid of some of this crap... not really a useful endeavor unless we get something like per-package USE defaults everyone has their own opinion as to what

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stupid USE defaults that need cleaning

2005-12-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 26 December 2005 00:09, Doug Goldstein wrote: > the USE defaults are a bit INSANE... We need to get rid of some of this > crap... not really a useful endeavor unless we get something like per-package USE defaults everyone has their own opinion as to what a 'good' or 'sane' default is a

[gentoo-dev] Stupid USE defaults that need cleaning

2005-12-25 Thread Doug Goldstein
the USE defaults are a bit INSANE... We need to get rid of some of this crap... ./default-linux/x86/2005.0/make.defaults:USE="alsa apm arts avi berkdb bitmap-fo nts crypt cups eds emboss encode fortran foomaticdb gdbm gif gnome gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 imlib ipv6 jpeg kde libg++ libwww mad mikmod

Re: [gentoo-dev] making dodoc and dohtml die when they fail and stricter is on

2005-12-25 Thread Chris White
On Monday 26 December 2005 10:26, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > I wouldn't like this. > The reason is, they are also used in eclasses that might be generic; while > for example kde eclass checks for the presence of files before dodoc-ing > them, I would rather see it ignore the actually presen

Re: [gentoo-dev] making dodoc and dohtml die when they fail and stricter is on

2005-12-25 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Monday 26 December 2005 00:32, Petteri Räty wrote: > > Currently there are quite a few ebuilds in the tree that execute dodoc > > or dohtml for files that do not exist. I think it would be nice to have > > ebuilds die if this is the case. I wouldn't like this. The reason is, they are also used i

Re: [gentoo-dev] making dodoc and dohtml die when they fail and stricter is on

2005-12-25 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Monday 26 December 2005 08:14, Brian Harring wrote: > On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 12:54:04AM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: > > Currently there are quite a few ebuilds in the tree that execute dodoc > > or dohtml for files that do not exist. I think it would be nice to have > > ebuilds die if this is th

[gentoo-dev] making dodoc and dohtml die when they fail and stricter is on

2005-12-25 Thread Petteri Räty
Moving this to gentoo-dev then. Original Message Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] making dodoc and dohtml die when they fail and stricter is on Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:14:46 -0800 From: Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org To: gentoo-

Re: [gentoo-dev] mozextension.eclass

2005-12-25 Thread Petteri Räty
Lance Albertson wrote: > Bryan Østergaard wrote: > >>On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 02:00:19PM -0600, Jory A. Pratt wrote: >> >> >>>Once thunderbird 1.5 comes out same will be done for locales support in >>>ebuilds. I am gonna push this eclass rather fast as it benefits so many >>>users/devs. Any objecti

Re: [gentoo-dev] mozextension.eclass

2005-12-25 Thread Lance Albertson
Bryan Østergaard wrote: > On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 02:00:19PM -0600, Jory A. Pratt wrote: > >>Once thunderbird 1.5 comes out same will be done for locales support in >>ebuilds. I am gonna push this eclass rather fast as it benefits so many >>users/devs. Any objections should be made immediately, 12

Re: [gentoo-dev] mozextension.eclass

2005-12-25 Thread Bryan Østergaard
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 02:00:19PM -0600, Jory A. Pratt wrote: > > Once thunderbird 1.5 comes out same will be done for locales support in > ebuilds. I am gonna push this eclass rather fast as it benefits so many > users/devs. Any objections should be made immediately, 1200 CST Monday > Dec. 26, 2

[gentoo-dev] mozextension.eclass

2005-12-25 Thread Jory A. Pratt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yes one more extention for mozilla ebuilds, and possible others. The purpose behind the eclass is to allow us a way to install locales for firefox/thunderbird/firefox-bin/thunderbird-bin without causing a major headache. The eclass is derived from wor

Re: [gentoo-dev] mac/xmms-mac licence issue

2005-12-25 Thread Curtis Napier
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: Would you like us to add the Windows XP source code to the tree with LICENSE="gpl-2" as well? No, but could you add Win2000? ktnks. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] mac/xmms-mac licence issue

2005-12-25 Thread Luis F. Araujo
Bret Towe wrote: On 12/24/05, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:17:05 -0800 Bret Towe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On 12/24/05, Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > This isn't politics, but copyright infringement on top of a | > ridiculous license (wh