On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 22:48:32 +0100
Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please find attached GLEP 47: "Creating 'safe' environment variables".
Could you add a definition of 'safe' to the GLEP? It's not clear what
this means at the moment.
--
Kevin F. Quinn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signa
On Thursday 09 February 2006 22:05, Ned Ludd wrote:
> I would like to see it drop the tab handling for indicating newlines
> and just use a real newlines when we want a newline.
>
> While having the tabs makes it easier for people to read it increases
> the byte size and adds some undesired complex
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 22:05:35 -0500 Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| The words AUXFILE EBUILD MISCFILE DISTFILE could be using shorter
| names such as AUX EBD MSC DST like the existing vdb CONTENTS
| files does for objects dirs and symlinks.
Would be interesting to see a comparison made betwee
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 00:21 +0100, Torsten Veller wrote:
> * Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Agenda:
> > * GLEP 44 - Manifest2 format
> >
> > Outcome:
> > * Council members were generally in agreement that GLEP 44 is a good
> >idea, but without genone present to answer questions, the co
On Friday 10 February 2006 01:20, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Mmm. Do you consider the cost of slightly simplified wording in the
> GLEP now to be worth extra effort that may be required in the future by
> some especially whacked out port? I'd prefer to see at least a note in
> the GLEP stating that t
On Friday 10 February 2006 01:26, Alec Warner wrote:
> Assuming the CHOST variable is 'safe' is not a good thing, users can
> over-ride this variable. Can you specify some behavior when it's set to
> something bogus ( invalid form ) or something thats not in the mapping?
Changing CHOST variable in
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 19:26:11 -0500 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Assuming the CHOST variable is 'safe' is not a good thing, users can
| over-ride this variable. Can you specify some behavior when it's set
| to something bogus ( invalid form ) or something thats not in the
| mapping?
Us
Grobian wrote:
> Please find attached GLEP 47: "Creating 'safe' environment variables".
>
> The GLEP is a Gentoo/Alt initiative. Constructive comments are welcome.
>
>
> The variables ``ELIBC``, ``KERNEL`` and ``ARCH`` are currently set in
> the profiles when other than their defaults for a GN
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 01:11:00 +0100 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Friday 10 February 2006 00:50, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > Provision should be made for future ports that require more than two
| > keywords. There's no particular reason to artificially limit this to
| >
On Friday 10 February 2006 00:50, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Provision should be made for future ports that require more than two
> keywords. There's no particular reason to artificially limit this to
> two at this stage.
There's a reason: simplicity. More than two part keywords simply are difficult
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 22:48:32 +0100 Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Please find attached GLEP 47: "Creating 'safe' environment variables".
> Author: Diego Pettenò, Fabian Groffen
> <{flameeyes,[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Could you use the standard format please?
> Status: Active
Should be Draft
* Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Agenda:
> * GLEP 44 - Manifest2 format
>
> Outcome:
> * Council members were generally in agreement that GLEP 44 is a good
>idea, but without genone present to answer questions, the council
>was unwilling to approve or deny it. Postponed to next meet
Version 1.0 of eselect, the modular configuration framework, is now
out. All changes since 1.0_rc2 have been bugfixes.
We haven't split out some of the "shipped with eselect but not core
functionality" modules in this release, since I didn't want to break
anything horribly -- that will probably be
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 15:25:43 -0500 Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Outcome:
I've committed the amendment to GLEP 39 (council) as discussed. It
should show up on the web within an hour or three. If I or docutils
screwed it up, someone please let me know.
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Devel
Please find attached GLEP 47: "Creating 'safe' environment variables".
The GLEP is a Gentoo/Alt initiative. Constructive comments are welcome.
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo/Alt
GLEP: 47
Title: Creating 'safe' environment variables
Version: $Revision: 1.1 $
Last-Modified: $Date: 2006/02/09 21:42:57 $
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have some questions.
- Does portage use ccache transparently for ebuilds using scons?
- Do I need to patch the SConstruct file to use ccache?
- Does portage use ccache independently from the buildsystem used?
I don't think it can work tra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have some questions.
- Does portage use ccache transparently for ebuilds using scons?
- Do I need to patch the SConstruct file to use ccache?
- Does portage use ccache independently from the buildsystem used?
I don't think it can work transparently for scons, be
Present:
azarah (Martin Schlemmer)
Koon (Thierry Carrez)
Swift (Sven Vermeulen)
agriffis (Aron Griffis)
seemant (Seemant Kulleen)
solar (Ned Ludd)
vapier (Mike Frysinger)
Agenda:
* GLEP 44 - Manifest2 format
Outcome:
* Council members were generally in agreement that GLEP 44 is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi users, developers and not-so-innocent bystanders,
effective a few days ago, we have entered a winterly package freeze for
all packages maintained by the Java Team. No new Java packages will be
put in the tree unless they fix serious issues or secu
Scott Stoddard wrote:
> Thanks kloeri, blubb, metalgod, and everyone else I've talked to in the
> past couple of days. I'll do my best to keep up the standards. (and by
> jebus ciaranm, I'll use repoman!)
"If everyone were like you, I'd be out of business!" (repoman)
Welcome to the team!
--
Sa
Hi,
I have some questions.
- Does portage use ccache transparently for ebuilds using scons?
- Do I need to patch the SConstruct file to use ccache?
- Does portage use ccache independently from the buildsystem used?
thx
Frieder
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
A final note on this:
The report is filed however I have done an emerge -v -uD world
since I had this problem. I uninstalled rsnapshot before the
update. (This was a few days ago)
Got the sources for version 1.2.2 built, installed and am using it.
(version 1,2,2 does NOT have that problem)
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 07:44:06AM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Bryan "=?utf8?Q?=C3=98stergaard?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Please file a bug on https://bugs.gentoo.org so I can fix this. No, I
> > don't accept bug reports on gentoo-dev ML :)
>
> I'd do this for sure but the bugzilla set
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 07:44:06AM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> At any rate attempting to log in with the supplied passwd and real
> name fails ...
Use the supplied email adress as login.
./Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd
pgpLkVg
Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The proces never asked me for a uid when creating account. It just
> asked for my real name and email. So after receiving the passwd I'm
> not sure what it wants for uid but guessing the `real' name it asked
> for is it... it was not so stated though.
>
Harry Putnam wrote:
> At any rate attempting to log in with the supplied passwd and real
> name fails ...
Use e-mail.
--
Krzysiek Pawlik key id: 0xBC51
desktop-misc, desktop-dock, x86, java...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bryan "=?utf8?Q?=C3=98stergaard?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please file a bug on https://bugs.gentoo.org so I can fix this. No, I
> don't accept bug reports on gentoo-dev ML :)
I'd do this for sure but the bugzilla setup won't let me login. I had
to create an account since I've never used b
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 07:23:27AM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> > Please file a bug on https://bugs.gentoo.org so I can fix this. No, I
> > don't accept bug reports on gentoo-dev ML :)
>
> Will do but I wanted this to be posted because anyone running
> rsnapshot might lose some backups. What hap
Bryan "=?utf8?Q?=C3=98stergaard?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> The portage version of rsnapshot 1.2.1 (most recent) has a problem
>> with the newest gnu cp. It can cause rsnapshot to eat all your
>> carefully saved backups. This was discussed on rsnapshot list some
>> time ago:
>>
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 07:08:45AM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> From: Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: rsnapshot and cp bug
> Newsgroups: gmane.linux.gentoo.devel
> Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 08:54:02 -0600
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> [This message was posted some time a
From: Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: rsnapshot and cp bug
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.gentoo.devel
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 08:54:02 -0600
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[This message was posted some time ago but failed to show on the list
I've resubscribed so hope it goes thru now
Nothing in the meta - would whoever is currently considering themselves
to be maintainer pop into bug 115861? I don't want to be misled by the
last dev who did a bump to think they might be the same person as the
maintainer ;)
~mcummings
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mess
On Thursday 09 February 2006 20:23, Jason Stubbs wrote:
...
Wrong list :/
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thursday 09 February 2006 15:00, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 03:04:08PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Time again for one of those mails; this time from me. Due to time
> > constraints,
> > real life and coming close to burning out I'm stepping down as relea
34 matches
Mail list logo