Re: [gentoo-dev] Searching for a person who can advice me

2006-02-24 Thread Rafael Bugajewski
George Prowse wrote: Pick an area to help in and help with it (file bug reports, submit patches, comment on mailing lists). If people notice you are working well towards a specific area you are far more likely to be mentored. Ask this question to a developer in a few months time, one who you

[gentoo-dev] SRC_URI component naming collision

2006-02-24 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
Two ways this one can occur. Way the first: foo-1.0 has a file in SRC_URI called foo.pdf. Then foo-1.1 comes along, and has a different foo.pdf. Way the second: foo-1.0 has a file called examples-1.0.tar.bz2. bar-1.0 also has a file called examples-1.0.tar.bz2. To avoid this, ensure that your

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-util/glimmer

2006-02-24 Thread John N. Laliberte
Hello, dev-util/glimmer has been package masked. It is a very old gtk+-1 code editor. This package will be removed one week from today, March 3rd 2006. Please respond if you feel it should not be removed. Thanks, -John (AllanonJL) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] dev-lang/nqc could use a maintainer...

2006-02-24 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
Does someone want to pick up dev-lang/nqc? It's a C-like compiler for Lego Mindstorms, and it needs some version bump loving (bug #89257) and some nasty global scope code replacing. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web

Re: [gentoo-dev] Find apps not ported to modular X

2006-02-24 Thread Donnie Berkholz
packages. Progress graph: http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_progress.png Latest list: http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.txt.20060224 Herds and people with 5 or more unported packages, and change in # of packages: 46 none

Re: [gentoo-dev] SRC_URI component naming collision

2006-02-24 Thread Jochen Maes
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: Two ways this one can occur. Way the first: foo-1.0 has a file in SRC_URI called foo.pdf. Then foo-1.1 comes along, and has a different foo.pdf. Way the second: foo-1.0 has a file called examples-1.0.tar.bz2. bar-1.0 also has a file called examples-1.0.tar.bz2. To

Re: [gentoo-dev] SRC_URI component naming collision

2006-02-24 Thread Doug Goldstein
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: -snip- Current offenders shall be receiving bugs shortly, since That Which Shall Not Be Named now checks for this. The One Tool To Rule Them All? TOT4A - TOTAL -- Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dev.gentoo.org/~cardoe/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

[gentoo-portage-dev] Config Cleanup Last Call

2006-02-24 Thread Alec Warner
Please review for badness, otherwise I'll commit this soon ;) --- portage.py 2006-01-15 00:08:06.170717008 -0500 +++ - 2006-01-15 00:22:00.597106000 -0500 @@ -931,17 +931,8 @@ self.use_defs = copy.deepcopy(clone.use_defs) self.usemask =

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Config Cleanup Last Call

2006-02-24 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Saturday 25 February 2006 10:40, Alec Warner wrote: Please review for badness, otherwise I'll commit this soon ;) $ grep ^\- portage-config-cleanup.patch | wc -l 58 $ grep ^\+ portage-config-cleanup.patch | wc -l 41 The unrelated PORTAGE_BINHOST chunk is -15/+1 which makes the relevant part

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Config Cleanup Last Call

2006-02-24 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Saturday 25 February 2006 10:40, Alec Warner wrote: Please review for badness, otherwise I'll commit this soon ;) - self.backupenv = os.environ.copy() - self.configlist.append(self.backupenv) # XXX Why though? - self.configdict[backupenv]=self.configlist[-1] +