On Monday 10 April 2006 05:26, Daniel Ahlberg wrote:
* if ebuild has $PN in SRC_URI (cosmetic).
Why is this one bad? It creates some flexibility, and has the name of the
package in one place only.
Paul
--
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage:
Because you can't cut-n-paste the url when editing the ebuild.
Michael Sterrett
-Mr. Bones.-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Monday 10 April 2006 05:26, Daniel Ahlberg wrote:
* if ebuild has $PN in SRC_URI (cosmetic).
Why is this one bad? It creates some
I've been working on an ebuild that, ideally, would use the subversion
eclass to checkout a snapshot of the ebuild (this is for local program).
I plan to just put the repository version in the ebuild PV - ie:
myprogram-224.ebuild.
The problem is that portage always want to re-emerge this package
On Monday 10 April 2006 08:09, Caleb Tennis wrote:
I've been working on an ebuild that, ideally, would use the subversion
eclass to checkout a snapshot of the ebuild (this is for local program).
I plan to just put the repository version in the ebuild PV - ie:
myprogram-224.ebuild.
doesnt this
On Monday 10 April 2006 04:19, Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Monday 10 April 2006 05:26, Daniel Ahlberg wrote:
* if ebuild has $PN in SRC_URI (cosmetic).
Why is this one bad? It creates some flexibility, and has the name of the
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 19:15 +, Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
Carsten Lohrke carlo at gentoo.org writes:
How do you want not to enforce it?
Have you actually read the proposal? It's quite sensible and is entitled:
Proposal: Integrated boot themes on LiveCDs and installations
I suppose
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 08:44:49 -0400
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 10 April 2006 04:19, Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Monday 10 April 2006 05:26, Daniel Ahlberg wrote:
* if ebuild has $PN in SRC_URI (cosmetic).
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 19:15 +, Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
Carsten Lohrke carlo at gentoo.org writes:
How do you want not to enforce it?
Have you actually read the proposal? It's quite sensible and is entitled:
Proposal: Integrated boot themes on LiveCDs and
Curtis Napier wrote: [Mon Apr 10 2006, 09:53:04AM CDT]
I'm willing to theme *.gentoo.org to match [...].
Speaking of which, what is the current status of the web redesign?
Thanks,
g2boojum
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Curtis Napier wrote:
Spyderous already has a new logo started that we can build on. We can
easily take it and build an entire theme around it. We also have the
lila theme and the Gentoo Icon Set we can use as raw material. Both of
them could
Curtis Napier wrote:
I think we should have a unified Gentoo Theme that cuts across all
projects. I'm willing to theme *.gentoo.org to match and I'm also
willing to help out with theming other things or actually creating the
artwork if we really need help on that front (I'm not an artist but
Grant Goodyear wrote:
Curtis Napier wrote: [Mon Apr 10 2006, 09:53:04AM CDT]
I'm willing to theme *.gentoo.org to match [...].
Speaking of which, what is the current status of the web redesign?
Thanks,
g2boojum
Well, I was planning on announcing this later on but I guess now is as
good a
On Monday 10 April 2006 16:53, Curtis Napier wrote:
We also have the
lila theme and the Gentoo Icon Set we can use as raw material. Both of
them could easily be reworked into something we can use if we need to.
I suggest you to not consider the gentoo icon set. As it is is a _really_ bad
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Curtis Napier wrote:
Spyderous already has a new logo started that we can build on. We can
easily take it and build an entire theme around it. We also have the
lila theme and the Gentoo Icon Set we can use as raw material. Both of
them could easily be reworked into
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 14:08 -0400, Curtis Napier wrote:
Wolf31o2, what about you and the other CD maintainers, are you guys
willing to use this if we can get it done?
CD creation has nothing to do with it, really. We simply make stuff
based on the defaults. If there were a branding USE flag
Curtis Napier wrote: [Mon Apr 10 2006, 11:21:14AM CDT]
The redesign as it was known up until this point is no more. There were
things the winner of the contest had to do and he failed to do them
(after almost 2 years of trying to get him too). I discussed it with
klieber a little and after
Grant Goodyear wrote:
Curtis Napier wrote: [Mon Apr 10 2006, 11:21:14AM CDT]
The redesign as it was known up until this point is no more. There were
things the winner of the contest had to do and he failed to do them
(after almost 2 years of trying to get him too). I discussed it with
klieber
On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
drobbins left and turned over the Gentoo IP to us, one thing that he
kept was the flying saucer guy. I believe that he was allowing us to
use it while we got the redesign
Vapier wrote: [Mon Apr 10 2006, 05:25:23PM CDT]
On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
drobbins left and turned over the Gentoo IP to us, one thing that he
kept was the flying saucer guy. I believe that he
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:21:14 -0400
Curtis Napier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead, I'm now the Web Coordinator. I proposed this new role to
the Infra Leads and met no resistance or objections so I have taken
the initiative and created the role. Also, neysx and I together were
approached and
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
drobbins left and turned over the Gentoo IP to us, one thing that he
kept was the flying saucer guy. I believe that he was allowing us to
use it
On Monday 10 April 2006 18:38, Curtis Napier wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
drobbins left and turned over the Gentoo IP to us, one thing that he
kept was the flying
On Mon, 2006-10-04 at 18:25 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
drobbins left and turned over the Gentoo IP to us, one thing that he
kept was the flying saucer guy. I believe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olivier Crete wrote:
i'll miss him :(
Yea we have to keep him, he is one of the most important members of our
community.
Agreed! I like the lil' alien. (In some obscure way, he reminds me of Earthbound
. . .)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 10 April 2006 18:38, Curtis Napier wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
drobbins left and turned over the Gentoo IP to us, one thing that he
kept
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 10 April 2006 14:08, Curtis Napier wrote:
I honestly think we can make it happen if we all pitch in.
a simple news item on the front page + GWN request could prob gather a lot of
attention
other WM's/desktops can also be done if someone is willing to do
On Monday 10 April 2006 20:38, Curtis Napier wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 10 April 2006 18:38, Curtis Napier wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
drobbins left and
Vapier wrote: [Fri Apr 07 2006, 07:00:22PM EDT]
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 13:54, Aron Griffis wrote:
Vapier wrote: [Tue Apr 04 2006, 01:12:28AM EDT]
the idea is that it's common sense and to need to vote on something
like this seems asinine
It might seem that way, but something that
On Saturday 01 April 2006 04:22, Mike Frysinger wrote:
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the
2nd Thursday once a month), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
irc.freenode.net) !
due to LWE we're pushing it back to the 21st
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing
wwwredesign.gentoo.org already has been converted and is going live on
www.gentoo.org shortly (we just have a few last minute things to do).
can we add a robots.txt on wwwredesign.gentoo.org that disallows /
from * ? if the site is just for testing a new layout or code, we do
not want (any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
What do people think about adding userpriv and usersandox to make.globals
FEATURES? I've been using these for a long time and haven't had any trouble
with them. Are there any arguments against making them default?
Zac
-BEGIN PGP
Zac Medico wrote:
What do people think about adding userpriv and usersandox to make.globals
FEATURES? I've been using these for a long time and haven't had any trouble
with them. Are there any arguments against making them default?
I didn't verify this personally, but a few days ago mkay
Zac Medico posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon,
10 Apr 2006 02:24:49 -0700:
What do people think about adding userpriv and usersandox to make.globals
FEATURES? I've been using these for a long time and haven't had any
trouble with them. Are there any arguments against making
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 02:24 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
What do people think about adding userpriv and usersandox to make.globals
FEATURES?
I've been using these for a long time and haven't had any trouble with them.
Are there
On Monday 10 April 2006 08:08, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 02:24 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
What do people think about adding userpriv and usersandox to make.globals
FEATURES? I've been using these for a long time and haven't had any
trouble with them. Are there any arguments
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 10 April 2006 08:08, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 02:24 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
What do people think about adding userpriv and usersandox to make.globals
FEATURES? I've been using these for a long time and
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 04:28, Zac Medico wrote:
Simon Stelling wrote:
Zac Medico wrote:
What do people think about adding userpriv and usersandox to
make.globals FEATURES? I've been using these for a long time and
haven't had any trouble with them. Are there any arguments against
37 matches
Mail list logo
