> A few words from the horses mouth:
>
> "I'm Jon Hood from Huntsville, AL. I was a Gentoo developer before, but
> some problems came up and now I'm returning. All my spare time is put
> into developing applications for voip (esp. Asterisk), Gentoo, and last
> but DEFINITELY not least, my wonderf
On Monday 17 April 2006 05:08, Luca Longinotti wrote:
> The PHP Herd announces that the old-style PHP packages, which were
> unsupported and deprecated for months, are finally going away.
> After months of work, the team considers the new dev-lang/php package
> and the related dev-php[4,5]/ categor
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 21:49, John Mylchreest wrote:
> "I'm Jon Hood from Huntsville, AL. I was a Gentoo developer before, but
> some problems came up and now I'm returning. All my spare time is put
> into developing applications for voip (esp. Asterisk), Gentoo, and last
> but DEFINITELY not lea
Hello,
As some may have noticed, net-wireless/aircrack's upstream vanished a
few months ago. However, a new project named aircrack-ng [1] should
take over where aircrack left.
An ebuild for aircrack-ng-0.4 [2] is now in Portage as
net-wireless/aircrack-ng. Please test and migrate to aircrack-ng i
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 18:38, Tuan Van wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > as part of my on going effort to make the glibc experience suck less, ive
> > decided to kill USE=userlocales and /etc/locales.build aspects.
>
> but then it will suck (in) more stuff into /usr/lib/locale/, no ?
the amount
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> as part of my on going effort to make the glibc experience suck less, ive
> decided to kill USE=userlocales and /etc/locales.build aspects.
>
but then it will suck (in) more stuff into /usr/lib/locale/, no ?
regards,
Tuan Van
PS: nice header ;)
...
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.
as part of my on going effort to make the glibc experience suck less, ive
decided to kill USE=userlocales and /etc/locales.build aspects.
so what do you get in return ? a bastardized Gentoo version of Debian's
locale-gen. now you edit /etc/locale.gen with a slightly diff syntax
from /etc/loca
OK, You got me. Not really *new* but meh!
I'd like to welcome back Jon Hood (squinky86) who has returned after a
prolonged hiatus. If you wish to cheer or throw underwear, this is your
cue. Jon hails from Huntsville, AL, but its not his fault, bless.
Jon will be mostly working on accessibility and
Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten wrote:
It's the driver for NVIDIA nForce motherboard sound card. It's OSS-only, it's
badly broken (hardlocks machines and so on), lacks someone who can maintain
it (missing hardware mostly) and there are bugs open for it.
If nobody steps up, I'm going to remove it a mo
It's the driver for NVIDIA nForce motherboard sound card. It's OSS-only, it's
badly broken (hardlocks machines and so on), lacks someone who can maintain
it (missing hardware mostly) and there are bugs open for it.
If nobody steps up, I'm going to remove it a month from now.
--
Diego "Flameeye
foser wrote:
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 17:56 +0300, Philippe Trottier wrote:
If no one has an objection, I'll pick up that package, I think it is fun, never
tought I'd use it, but I have so much code written I'd like how much I have
really done.
If there is no objection I'll make the update need
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 17:56 +0300, Philippe Trottier wrote:
> If no one has an objection, I'll pick up that package, I think it is fun,
> never
> tought I'd use it, but I have so much code written I'd like how much I have
> really done.
>
> If there is no objection I'll make the update needed,
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 10:53 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> dont know what policy you're referring to seeing as how we dont have any
> concerning unmaintained packages
Still hiding... c'mon you are better than this.
> sure, for new packages ... isnt a new package
The policy concerning metad
foser wrote:
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 10:22 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
either you have a policy of cutting unmaintained packages or you dont ... you
cant have some vague middle ground
Hide behind policy if you can't do it with common sense. The policy is
to add valid metadata.xml data to pack
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 10:41, foser wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 10:22 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > either you have a policy of cutting unmaintained packages or you dont ...
> > you cant have some vague middle ground
>
> Hide behind policy if you can't do it with common sense.
dont know wh
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 10:22 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> either you have a policy of cutting unmaintained packages or you dont ... you
> cant have some vague middle ground
Hide behind policy if you can't do it with common sense. The policy is
to add valid metadata.xml data to packages that do n
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 09:51, foser wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 14:11 +0100, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> > Maybe you aren't a native English speaker; it was clear from Mike's
> > post that he would rather you didn't go ahead with removing hundreds
> > of packages.
>
> I don't know how this relat
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 07:00, foser wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 16:42 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > well the logical thing would be to go to bugzilla and search for ""
> > ... and guess what ? no more open bug reports
>
> I already did that when I wrote it, actually there still is an o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Give Thomas a warm welcome if you haven't already done so :)
Welcome Thomas!
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Danny van Dyk wrote:
Congratulations Christian! :-)
Danny
Another perl monk joining!
Welcome and beware of the rabid vapier!
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 14:11 +0100, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> Are you suggesting that all packages with long standing open bug
> reports should be removed? There are thousands that fit that
> description. If not, then what is your definition of "maintained"? It
> could be argued that since Mike fixe
On 18/04/06, foser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 16:42 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > well the logical thing would be to go to bugzilla and search for "" ...
> > and guess what ? no more open bug reports
>
> I already did that when I wrote it, actually there still is an
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 16:42 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> well the logical thing would be to go to bugzilla and search for "" ...
> and guess what ? no more open bug reports
I already did that when I wrote it, actually there still is an open bug
for it. So I guess you didn't actually go tro
23 matches
Mail list logo
