Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X: unmasking tonight, RFC

2006-04-19 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
On 3/23/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi all,

 There aren't really any remaining blockers to keep modular X out of
 ~arch, as far as I can see.

 If anyone's got one, please bring it up now. I'm planning to unmask
 later tonight.


Is it planned to release some xserver ebuilds ?

Beber

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X: unmasking tonight, RFC

2006-04-19 Thread Donnie Berkholz

Bertrand Jacquin wrote:

Is it planned to release some xserver ebuilds ?


Could you rephrase the question? I don't understand it.

Thanks,
Donnie
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-dev] Portage Features That Depend on Binaries [WAS: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: 2.1 release candidate soon? ]

2006-04-19 Thread Alec Warner
Philipp Riegger wrote:
 On Apr 15, 2006, at 6:10 PM, Duncan wrote:
 
 But i really think this is not about helping but about confusion.  If i
 post my emerge --info you don't know if i really use confcache  even
 if i
 have FEATURES=confcache, because emerge --info does not say if i  have
 emerged confcache and, if i have emerged it, which version it is.  I
 think
 this should also be listed in emerge --info.


 Very good point.
 
 
 Should i file a bug on this?
 
 Philipp
 

Nope, lets bring it to -dev ( yay crossposting )

The issue for those on the -dev ML, is that portage has some features
that require binaries ( sandbox, ccache, confcache ) and so you need two
things for them to work.  You need FEATURES={sandbox,ccache,confcache}
and you need each package installed.  The FEATURES line is already
printed.  sandbox is already in info_pkgs.

Is there any problem with adding dev-util/confcache and dev-util/ccache
to info_pkgs?
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Features That Depend on Binaries [WAS: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: 2.1 release candidate soon? ]

2006-04-19 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Thursday 20 April 2006 05:28, Alec Warner wrote:
 Is there any problem with adding dev-util/confcache and dev-util/ccache
 to info_pkgs?
Being the one to take the pieces of confcache, I'm _really_ happy to see that 
happening :)

-- 
Diego Flameeyes Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE


pgpERnW88JAQE.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: squinky86

2006-04-19 Thread Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 20:49, John Mylchreest wrote:
 I am good with c++, java, assembly, php, and sql. Feel free to ask me
 about Asterisk, too. It's good to be returning to Gentoo!

Welcome back Jon, you're now added to my list of devs to annoy when I have 
Asterisk questions :-)

-- 
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
Gentoo Linux Security Team


pgpi2VikhrYk2.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-dev] Remove your modular X unmask

2006-04-19 Thread Donnie Berkholz

Hi all,

This is a reminder to everybody that now modular X is in ~arch, you need 
to REMOVE YOUR MODULAR X UNMASK.


We're getting lots of issues because people aren't doing this and are 
getting package.mask'd versions of programs because they forgot about it.


In particular, xorg-server 1.0.99 has an ABI break, which breaks all 
Nvidia and ATI binary drivers.


Thanks,
Donnie
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: 2.1 release candidate soon?

2006-04-19 Thread Philipp Riegger

On Apr 15, 2006, at 6:10 PM, Duncan wrote:

But i really think this is not about helping but about confusion.  
If i
post my emerge --info you don't know if i really use confcache  
even if i
have FEATURES=confcache, because emerge --info does not say if i  
have
emerged confcache and, if i have emerged it, which version it is.  
I think

this should also be listed in emerge --info.


Very good point.


Should i file a bug on this?

Philipp

--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Portage Features That Depend on Binaries [WAS: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: 2.1 release candidate soon? ]

2006-04-19 Thread Alec Warner
Philipp Riegger wrote:
 On Apr 15, 2006, at 6:10 PM, Duncan wrote:
 
 But i really think this is not about helping but about confusion.  If i
 post my emerge --info you don't know if i really use confcache  even
 if i
 have FEATURES=confcache, because emerge --info does not say if i  have
 emerged confcache and, if i have emerged it, which version it is.  I
 think
 this should also be listed in emerge --info.


 Very good point.
 
 
 Should i file a bug on this?
 
 Philipp
 

Nope, lets bring it to -dev ( yay crossposting )

The issue for those on the -dev ML, is that portage has some features
that require binaries ( sandbox, ccache, confcache ) and so you need two
things for them to work.  You need FEATURES={sandbox,ccache,confcache}
and you need each package installed.  The FEATURES line is already
printed.  sandbox is already in info_pkgs.

Is there any problem with adding dev-util/confcache and dev-util/ccache
to info_pkgs?
-- 
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list