Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X: unmasking tonight, RFC
On 3/23/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, There aren't really any remaining blockers to keep modular X out of ~arch, as far as I can see. If anyone's got one, please bring it up now. I'm planning to unmask later tonight. Is it planned to release some xserver ebuilds ? Beber -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X: unmasking tonight, RFC
Bertrand Jacquin wrote: Is it planned to release some xserver ebuilds ? Could you rephrase the question? I don't understand it. Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Portage Features That Depend on Binaries [WAS: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: 2.1 release candidate soon? ]
Philipp Riegger wrote:
On Apr 15, 2006, at 6:10 PM, Duncan wrote:
But i really think this is not about helping but about confusion. If i
post my emerge --info you don't know if i really use confcache even
if i
have FEATURES=confcache, because emerge --info does not say if i have
emerged confcache and, if i have emerged it, which version it is. I
think
this should also be listed in emerge --info.
Very good point.
Should i file a bug on this?
Philipp
Nope, lets bring it to -dev ( yay crossposting )
The issue for those on the -dev ML, is that portage has some features
that require binaries ( sandbox, ccache, confcache ) and so you need two
things for them to work. You need FEATURES={sandbox,ccache,confcache}
and you need each package installed. The FEATURES line is already
printed. sandbox is already in info_pkgs.
Is there any problem with adding dev-util/confcache and dev-util/ccache
to info_pkgs?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Features That Depend on Binaries [WAS: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: 2.1 release candidate soon? ]
On Thursday 20 April 2006 05:28, Alec Warner wrote: Is there any problem with adding dev-util/confcache and dev-util/ccache to info_pkgs? Being the one to take the pieces of confcache, I'm _really_ happy to see that happening :) -- Diego Flameeyes Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE pgpERnW88JAQE.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: squinky86
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 20:49, John Mylchreest wrote: I am good with c++, java, assembly, php, and sql. Feel free to ask me about Asterisk, too. It's good to be returning to Gentoo! Welcome back Jon, you're now added to my list of devs to annoy when I have Asterisk questions :-) -- Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen Gentoo Linux Security Team pgpi2VikhrYk2.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Remove your modular X unmask
Hi all, This is a reminder to everybody that now modular X is in ~arch, you need to REMOVE YOUR MODULAR X UNMASK. We're getting lots of issues because people aren't doing this and are getting package.mask'd versions of programs because they forgot about it. In particular, xorg-server 1.0.99 has an ABI break, which breaks all Nvidia and ATI binary drivers. Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: 2.1 release candidate soon?
On Apr 15, 2006, at 6:10 PM, Duncan wrote: But i really think this is not about helping but about confusion. If i post my emerge --info you don't know if i really use confcache even if i have FEATURES=confcache, because emerge --info does not say if i have emerged confcache and, if i have emerged it, which version it is. I think this should also be listed in emerge --info. Very good point. Should i file a bug on this? Philipp -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Portage Features That Depend on Binaries [WAS: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: 2.1 release candidate soon? ]
Philipp Riegger wrote:
On Apr 15, 2006, at 6:10 PM, Duncan wrote:
But i really think this is not about helping but about confusion. If i
post my emerge --info you don't know if i really use confcache even
if i
have FEATURES=confcache, because emerge --info does not say if i have
emerged confcache and, if i have emerged it, which version it is. I
think
this should also be listed in emerge --info.
Very good point.
Should i file a bug on this?
Philipp
Nope, lets bring it to -dev ( yay crossposting )
The issue for those on the -dev ML, is that portage has some features
that require binaries ( sandbox, ccache, confcache ) and so you need two
things for them to work. You need FEATURES={sandbox,ccache,confcache}
and you need each package installed. The FEATURES line is already
printed. sandbox is already in info_pkgs.
Is there any problem with adding dev-util/confcache and dev-util/ccache
to info_pkgs?
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
