Daniel Goller posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Sun, 23 Apr 2006 23:50:17 -0500:
* In the case of disagreement on policy among QA members, the majority
of established QA members must agree with the action.
you shouldn't disagree about this policy, or you might as well not have
Duncan posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below,
on Sun, 23 Apr 2006 23:30:41 -0700:
The idea in either case is to minimize the possibility of something
occurring without enough of a majority opinion to make the decision look
arbitrary or subject to immediate reversal upon the whims of a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
Daniel Goller posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Sun, 23 Apr 2006 23:50:17 -0500:
* In the case of disagreement on policy among QA members, the majority
of established QA members must agree with the action.
you
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 07:03:02PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
That's a different matter. I didn't realize that it was 2.6 _only_. My
apologies. I should have looked for that before responding.
Also: while there are still a couple of 2.6 kernels in the tree prior to
2.6.10, I'm going to
On Sunday 23 April 2006 01:51, Mark Loeser wrote:
Here is the newest revision of my proposal. Not much has changed, but
I added and changed some small things. Constructive feedback is
appreciated. I'd like to get this voted on by the council at the next
meeting.
It looks reasonable to me.
Daniel Goller posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Mon, 24 Apr 2006 02:16:48 -0500:
the reason for my feedback was to have things laid out much clearer,
less vague and thus avoid problems down the road by situations occuring
in which things go like well i thought i (a QA dev) had the
Daniel Goller [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Mark Loeser wrote:
Here is the newest revision of my proposal. Not much has changed, but I
added and changed some small things. Constructive feedback is
appreciated. I'd like to get this voted on by the council at the next
meeting.
* The QA
Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Daniel Goller [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Mark Loeser wrote:
Here is the newest revision of my proposal. Not much has changed, but I
added and changed some small things. Constructive feedback is
appreciated. I'd like to get this voted on by the
Thomas Cort [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
* In case of emergency, or if package maintainers refuse to cooperate,
the QA team may take action themselves to fix the problem. The QA
team does not want to override the maintainer's wishes by default, but
only
wish to do so when the team finds
Mark Loeser posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:11:28 -0400:
* QA will take an active role in cleaning up unmaintained and broken
packages from the tree. It is also encouraged of members of the QA
team to assist in mentoring new developers that wish to
Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Mark Loeser posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:11:28 -0400:
* QA will take an active role in cleaning up unmaintained and broken
packages from the tree. It is also encouraged of members of the QA
team to assist in
And now in GLEP format for those who like that sort of thing :)
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0048.html
I made the two wording changes so it is more clear what I wanted to
communicate.
--
Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting qa toolchain x86)
email - halcy0n
On Sunday 23 April 2006 00:07, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 22 April 2006 17:37, Tuan Van wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
this is because your /etc/locales.gen isnt configured thus the default
is to generate *all* locales
can you magically migrate the existing /etc/locales.build to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Loeser wrote:
Daniel Goller [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Mark Loeser wrote:
Here is the newest revision of my proposal. Not much has changed, but I
added and changed some small things. Constructive feedback is
appreciated. I'd like to get this
I continue to see way more of these than I'm comfortable with.
Illegally implies the functionality will eventually go away, and stuff
will quit working. That what's making me uncomfortable.
Some time ago this came up on the dev list and I asked about bugging them
at that time. The reply was
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 04:10:50AM -0700, Duncan wrote:
I continue to see way more of these than I'm comfortable with.
Illegally implies the functionality will eventually go away, and stuff
will quit working. That what's making me uncomfortable.
Some time ago this came up on the dev list
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:55:58 -0700
Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking that /etc/portage/sets/glsa could be a symlink to set
list in the current metadata/glsa directory of the portage tree. That
file should be relatively easy to auto-generate from the existing
glsa*.xml files there
On Mon, 2006-24-04 at 14:20 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:55:58 -0700
Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking that /etc/portage/sets/glsa could be a symlink to set
list in the current metadata/glsa directory of the portage tree. That
file should be relatively
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:04:13 -0700
Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2006-24-04 at 14:20 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:55:58 -0700
Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking that /etc/portage/sets/glsa could be a symlink to
set list in the current
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 17:13 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:04:13 -0700
Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2006-24-04 at 14:20 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:55:58 -0700
Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking that
I'm trying to setup my superkaramba theme to have the emerge module
being threaded so the gui is still responsive while it's checking for
updates. But I'm running into this error
Unhandled exception in thread started by function main at 0xb68f356c
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
On Mon, 2006-24-04 at 22:09 -0400, Tom Hosiawa wrote:
I'm trying to setup my superkaramba theme to have the emerge module
being threaded so the gui is still responsive while it's checking for
updates. But I'm running into this error
Unhandled exception in thread started by function main at
22 matches
Mail list logo
