ive punted the cruft from base profile
On Thursday 25 May 2006 19:53, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> qmail ebuilds should be doing /var/qmail/control
99qmail from qmail ebuilds covers this
> kde ebuilds should be doing /usr/kde/*
45kdepaths-* from kde ebuilds covers this
> wtf is /usr/share/config fo
With great pleasure, I announce the testing release of new eselect
modules for BLAS, CBLAS and LAPACK implementations. You may say, "But we
already have 'eselect blas' and 'eselect lapack,' Donnie! What are you
thinking?" In reply, I would say, "The current eselect modules have many
limitations."
060525 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> wtf is /usr/share/config for ?
In /usr/share/config/ I have filelightrc & kio_isorc ;
there's also /usr/share/config.kcfg/ which contains gvconfig.kcfg :
I have Filelight 1.0_beta6 & Gwenview 1.3.1 installed & KDE 3.5.2 .
HTH
--
,,=
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> wtf is /usr/share/config for ?
kde-env covers that one.
Tuan
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thursday 25 May 2006 18:47, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Please, finally kill this thing from CONFIG_PROTECT in
> base/make.defaults
i dont see why a lot of that is needed
qmail ebuilds should be doing /var/qmail/control
kde ebuilds should be doing /usr/kde/*
wtf is /usr/share/config for ?
-mike
pgpQN
Am Freitag, 26. Mai 2006 01:10 schrieb Danny van Dyk:
> Am Freitag, 26. Mai 2006 00:50 schrieb Panard:
> > I removed need-cmake function and add :
> >
> > if [ ! -z "${NEED_CMAKE}" ]; then
> > DEPEND="dev-util/cmake"
> > else
> > DEPEND=">=dev-util/cmake-${NEED_CMAKE}"
> > fi
> > RDEPEND=""
On Friday 26 May 2006 01:10, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> DEPEND="dev-util/cmake-${NEED_CMAKE+-${NEED_CMAKE}}"
And see it die of a strange death missing the >= in front?
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM,
Am Freitag, 26. Mai 2006 00:50 schrieb Panard:
> I removed need-cmake function and add :
>
> if [ ! -z "${NEED_CMAKE}" ]; then
> DEPEND="dev-util/cmake"
> else
> DEPEND=">=dev-util/cmake-${NEED_CMAKE}"
> fi
> RDEPEND=""
>
> is it ok ?
Rather use
DEPEND="dev-util/cmake-${NEED_CMAKE+-${NEE
On Thu, 25 May 2006 14:37:57 -0500 Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| That said, I would certainly agree that a long list of authors, with
| one author per line, down the center of the page would, indeed, not
| look so good. A simple set of names (with links to the contributors
| page whi
Le Jeudi 25 Mai 2006 23:15, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
> use this instead ... makes for cleaner output:
> pushd "${BUILDDIR}" > /dev/null
Yes... in fact i was using cd; cd $OLDPWD to avoid that >/dev/null issue...
I've update the eclass.
Thanks
>
> otherwise i dont have any other real complaints
Ok,
I removed need-cmake function and add :
if [ ! -z "${NEED_CMAKE}" ]; then
DEPEND="dev-util/cmake"
else
DEPEND=">=dev-util/cmake-${NEED_CMAKE}"
fi
RDEPEND=""
is it ok ?
http://backzone.net/~panard/patches/gentoo-overlay/eclass/cmake.eclass
Panard
Le Jeudi 25 Mai 2006 13:31, Carste
Please, finally kill this thing from CONFIG_PROTECT in
base/make.defaults, we are not Debian... :P
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95
use this instead ... makes for cleaner output:
pushd "${BUILDDIR}" > /dev/null
otherwise i dont have any other real complaints ;P
-mike
pgp80QCg7OZpC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 08:04, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 22:09 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 23 May 2006 21:18, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 18 May 2006 06:41, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > > >> The package sys-apps/paludis
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 07:42, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Every other user that is asked to provide the messages with locales set
> to C comes back asking how do I do it. Then they come back saying, oh
> LC_ALL=C, or LC_MESSAGES=C didn't work, where do I put it exactly? Then
> they come back and say, oh,
Mark Loeser wrote: [Wed May 24 2006, 04:37:44PM CDT]
> Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > How was the conversion done? Do we now have a tool to convert rst to
> > guidexml, or was the conversion all done by hand (which would be a truly
> > frightening thought), or something else entirely
Mark Loeser wrote: [Thu May 25 2006, 12:39:56PM CDT]
> I changed "Authors" to be "Editors". I hope that will kill some of the
> controversy.
Thanks. That should certainly satisfy the license, and I, at least,
appreciate it.
> Ciaran, we recognized you on the front page and appreciate everything
Petre Rodan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> but whatever browser I use, the 'Authors' section from the main page is not
> rendered correctly (I only see 'editors' not 'authors'). can you fix that
> please?
>
> author:
> 1 a : one that originates or creates : SOURCE
>b capitalized : GOD 1
>
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> Stephen Bennett wrote:
>> "at a minimum such credit will appear where any other comparable
>> authorship credit appears and in a manner at least as prominent
>> as such other comparable authorship credit."
>
> Precisely. So the Authors section on the main page should lo
On Thursday 25 May 2006 16:37, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> Probably he meant
>
> NEED_CMAKE="x.y"
Exactly. Sorry for the typo.
Carsten
pgp0EvhAdBnkq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Jan Kundrát <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Nice job. Are the XML and XSLT sources available from our CVS? I wasn't
> able to find them.
Not yet. The "Contributing" page shows where it is currently hosted,
and I'm going to have it moved over to Gentoo infra soon. I just
haven't gotten around to it y
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> "at a minimum such credit will appear where any other comparable
> authorship credit appears and in a manner at least as prominent
> as such other comparable authorship credit."
Precisely. So the Authors section on the main page should look
something like:
Ciaran McCr
On Thursday 25 May 2006 16:39, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> i currently see no major difference between doing 'need-cmake x.y' and
> 'NEED_CMAKE x.y'...
Probably he meant
NEED_CMAKE="x.y"
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AM
Hi Carsten,
Am Donnerstag, 25. Mai 2006 13:31 schrieb Carsten Lohrke:
> Don't repeat a failure of the past. Do
>
>
> NEED_CMAKE x.y
>
> inherit foo
>
> ...
>
>
> instead this ugly toplevel function call.
And this is no ugly toplevel function fall?
i currently see no major difference between doing
Peter wrote: [Thu May 25 2006, 07:00:16AM CDT]
> On Thu, 25 May 2006 12:34:13 +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
>
> snip...
> > "at a minimum such credit will appear where any other comparable
> > authorship credit appears and in a manner at least as prominent as such
> > other comparable authorship c
Luis Medinas wrote:
> Jakub is right! Just add the name and the mail of the man and stop
> crying.
But - it's _already_ _there_ - right on the front page... case closed,
let's move on, finally? :=)))
--
jakub
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Jan Kundrát wrote:
> José Costa wrote:
>> The Gentoo Council/Gentoo Infra only needs to release one API for all
>> package managers, with all the procedures, how to do stuff standards,
>> quality assurance stuff, blabla...
>
> I don't see any reason why the Infrastructure Team should be affiliate
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 14:00 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Stephen Bennett wrote:
> > Two names are credited on the front page. One is conspicuously absent,
> > despite having done the vast majority of the original work.
>
>
> Large portions of the handbook were originally written by Ciaran McCreesh.
On Thu, 25 May 2006 12:34:13 +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
snip...
> "at a minimum such credit will appear where any other comparable
> authorship credit appears and in a manner at least as prominent as such
> other comparable authorship credit."
>
> Two names are credited on the front page. One
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> Two names are credited on the front page. One is conspicuously absent,
> despite having done the vast majority of the original work.
Large portions of the handbook were originally written by Ciaran McCreesh.
Maybe you need to read more carefully, or need better spectac
If we took half the time we spend to shoot down the rare things that are
getting done here to actually push some real improvement, Gentoo would
probably still be the most innovative Linux distro out there.
I'm feeling more and more a stranger.
--
K
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 08:04:05AM -0400, Peter wrote:
> As for the Authors, it clearly shows Tim and Mark as E D I T O R S.
in that case I think the section should be 'Editors' and not 'Authors'
bye,
peter
pgpd7WBDcgBaf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Don't repeat a failure of the past. Do
NEED_CMAKE x.y
inherit foo
...
instead this ugly toplevel function call.
Carsten
pgpkzcuaeL675.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 25 May 2006 07:04:05 -0400
Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But face it, ciaranm did contribute and he was aptly credited.
"at a minimum such credit will appear where any other comparable
authorship credit appears and in a manner at least as prominent as such
other comparable authorship
On Thu, 25 May 2006 01:43:33 +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2006 18:36:07 -0400
> Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> If you have any corrections, suggestions or improvements please contact
>> the editors. Large portions of the handbook were originally written by
>> Ciaran McCre
Mark Loeser wrote:
> At long last the devmanual is official. You can find it at
> http://devmanual.gentoo.org. I would like to thank plasmaroo for helping
> me with converting it to XML (since he did all of the XSL work to add in
> the features we needed to make it easy to write and expand upon).
Hi,
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:48:00PM -0400, Mark Loeser wrote:
> At long last the devmanual is official. You can find it at
> http://devmanual.gentoo.org. I would like to thank plasmaroo for helping
> me with converting it to XML (since he did all of the XSL work to add in
> the features we n
Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Thu, 25 May 2006 01:43:33 +0100:
> On Wed, 24 May 2006 18:36:07 -0400
> Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> If you have any corrections, suggestions or improvements please
>> contact the editors. Large portions o
38 matches
Mail list logo
