[gentoo-dev] QA Notice: pre-stripped files found

2006-07-01 Thread Alin Nastac
I have a question for portage devs. Is appending -g to CFLAGS tolerable from your pov? I ask this because net-dialup/freeradius allow me to install unstripped binaries but the correspondent configure option (--enable-developer) also append -g to CFLAGS. Otherwise, I will have to patch

[gentoo-dev] Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2007

2006-07-01 Thread Mike Frysinger
well it's about that time of the year ... time for nominating people for the next Gentoo Council for the quick low down: - nominations are from July 1 through July 31 - anyone can nominate - only Gentoo devs may be nominated so get with the nominating people ! for the full details,

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA Notice: pre-stripped files found

2006-07-01 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 01 July 2006 02:34, Alin Nastac wrote: I have a question for portage devs. Is appending -g to CFLAGS tolerable from your pov? you're confusing things adding debugging symbols has nothing to do with the stripping of a binary the warning is because the binaries are stripped (`strip

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA Notice: pre-stripped files found

2006-07-01 Thread Alin Nastac
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Saturday 01 July 2006 02:34, Alin Nastac wrote: I have a question for portage devs. Is appending -g to CFLAGS tolerable from your pov? you're confusing things adding debugging symbols has nothing to do with the stripping of a binary the warning is

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA Notice: pre-stripped files found

2006-07-01 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 01 July 2006 03:01, Alin Nastac wrote: Freeradius configure doesn't allow me to install unstripped binaries unless I also add -g to CFLAGS (which means that the binary will contain then fix the build files to not strip the binaries regardless, forcing -g into CFLAGS is just as

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: GPL and Source code providing

2006-07-01 Thread Kevin F. Quinn
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 20:53:42 + (UTC) Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kevin F. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted a) Accompany it with the complete corresponding machine-readable source code, which must be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily

Re: [gentoo-dev] Future developer

2006-07-01 Thread Luca Barbato
Paul de Vrieze wrote: ps. If I'm a bit away these days, it is due to me being preoccupied with my mentoring task. =) Congratulations ^^ lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Scientific Gentoo reorg: lets get it moving

2006-07-01 Thread George Shapovalov
Hi gang It looks like we got all the coments we could get, so lets get done with it then. What's left is minor legwork that is best done by the maintainers of the individual herds, here is the approximate list: Herds: 0. If you feel you did not polish up the idea of a particular herd or

Re: [gentoo-dev] Scientific Gentoo reorg: lets get it moving

2006-07-01 Thread Luis Medinas
On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 12:29 +0200, George Shapovalov wrote: sci-physics - many packages were listed, so a candidate, but I did not get a clear impression of how finalized the idea was and how many people finally decided to stay behind it. There's a problem with this. A few packages i listed

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: GPL and Source code providing

2006-07-01 Thread Duncan
Kevin F. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 01 Jul 2006 11:14:37 +0200: On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 20:53:42 + (UTC) Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kevin F. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted a) Accompany it with the complete corresponding

Re: [gentoo-dev] Scientific Gentoo reorg: lets get it moving

2006-07-01 Thread George Shapovalov
субота, 1. липень 2006 13:02, Luis Medinas Ви написали: On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 12:29 +0200, George Shapovalov wrote: sci-physics - many packages were listed, so a candidate, but I did not get a clear impression of how finalized the idea was and how many people finally decided to stay behind

[gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for July

2006-07-01 Thread Mike Frysinger
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the 2nd Thursday once a month), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) ! If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev

[gentoo-dev] Re: Future developer

2006-07-01 Thread Duncan
Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 30 Jun 2006 21:54:47 +0200: I'm proud to announce the arival of a future developer. His name is Tom. He arived last monday on 10:22 am (UTC+02). I and my wife will take care of mentoring him to full

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for July

2006-07-01 Thread Stephen Bennett
On 01 Jul 2006 07:34:49 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev list to see. GLEP 42. Noone on the list raised any objections last time it was sent

Re: [gentoo-dev] mozilla{-bin}/gecko-sdk masking

2006-07-01 Thread Ned Ludd
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 22:30 -0500, Jory A. Pratt wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ned Ludd wrote: On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 19:39 -0500, Jory A. Pratt wrote: As many are aware by now mozilla{-bin} are full of security issues. I will be p.masking them tonight along with

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-science] Scientific Gentoo reorg: lets get it moving

2006-07-01 Thread George Shapovalov
A short update. субота, 1. липень 2006 12:29, George Shapovalov Ви написали: 3. Create an alias for this new herd. It is probably best if the alias matches the name of the herd - bugwranglers will have no problem assigning the bugs then.. It looks like one cannot just create an alias, this is

[gentoo-dev] TreeCleaner June Removals

2006-07-01 Thread Alec Warner
dev-libs/nana bug # 32672 - Removed x11-wm/blwm bug # 71479 - Removed app-editors/gnotepad+ bug # 122993 - Removed net-misc/powerd bug # 70373 - Removed dev-lisp/cl-clx-sbcl bug # 134623 - Removed app-office/gnofin and gnome-extra/gnobog bug # 134624 - Removed net-p2p/dc-gui bug # 134630 - Removed

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-science] Scientific Gentoo reorg: on herd naming

2006-07-01 Thread George Shapovalov
The herd naming issue has surfaced in more detail again - there were already two comments that it is beneficial to keep -sci in herd names. I originally suggested that we drop it (and in general go with a catchier names), but now it looks like I am slowly turning towards being more conservative

Re: [gentoo-dev] Scientific Gentoo reorg: lets get it moving

2006-07-01 Thread Alexandre Buisse
On Sat, Jul 1, 2006 at 13:36:10 +0200, George Shapovalov wrote: Hi gang It looks like we got all the coments we could get, so lets get done with it then. What's left is minor legwork that is best done by the maintainers of the individual herds, here is the approximate list: math-proof

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP42 for Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for July

2006-07-01 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 01 July 2006 08:10, Stephen Bennett wrote: On 01 Jul 2006 07:34:49 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev list to see. GLEP 42.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for July

2006-07-01 Thread Stefan Schweizer
Hi, Can we have another Sunrise discussion please? I would love to have some feedback about Sunrise, about our progress and where we are still lacking. Thanks, Stefan -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Future developer

2006-07-01 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Friday 30 June 2006 22:48, Joshua Jackson wrote: Paul de Vrieze wrote: I'm proud to announce the arival of a future developer. His name is Tom. He arived last monday on 10:22 am (UTC+02). I and my wife will take care of mentoring him to full developership ;-). In the meantime, he's

Re: [gentoo-dev] Future developer

2006-07-01 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Saturday 01 July 2006 00:31, Seemant Kulleen wrote: Paul, Congratulations! What did you and your wife name him? When exactly was he born, etc? Give us details!! :) Official name: Tom Wei Calling name: Tom Last name: de Vrieze Gender: male Nationality: Dutch and Chinese (PRC)

[gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-dev-announce list

2006-07-01 Thread Ryan Hill
Donnie Berkholz wrote: My options are either missing important announcements or creating this list. I would prefer the list. What important announcements are you expecting to find at the bottom 50-100 posts of random relevance? The announcements are at the top, being the thing that triggered

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [experiment] Sunrise try 2

2006-07-01 Thread Stefan Schweizer
Luca Barbato wrote: Add support for QA checkers clientside and serverside (there are precommit hooks you can use for that) That way we will avoid those smart problems as described in irc long ago. Yeah this is now supported, the script has been greatly improved by shillelagh, thanks go to

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.1.1 testing/stablization and glibc 2.4

2006-07-01 Thread Ryan Hill
Chris Gianelloni wrote: OK, guys, I was speaking with vapier earlier about the possibility of getting gcc 4.1.1 stable for the 2006.1 release. We've managed to build some release media with it, and are planning on doing more testing with it. What we really need is for more people to test

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-dev-announce list

2006-07-01 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Ryan Hill wrote: Donnie Berkholz wrote: My options are either missing important announcements or creating this list. I would prefer the list. What important announcements are you expecting to find at the bottom 50-100 posts of random relevance? The announcements are at the top, being the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Scientific Gentoo reorg: lets get it moving

2006-07-01 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Luis Medinas wrote: There's a problem with this. A few packages i listed could be part of sci-crystallography too. If we start this new category we should had a few more related packages otherwise we will have this category empty. Another thing is who is really insterested in creating this