Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANNOUNCE] Anonymous CVS and SVN now available

2006-11-11 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 11/11/06, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: KingTaco and I are pleased to announce that we've completed setting up and testing the anonymous read-only CVS and SVN services for Gentoo repositories, and that they are now available for use. PR guys: post something to the front page /

Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 1.x and GNOME 1.x dependent package masking

2006-11-11 Thread Marius Mauch
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 22:55:00 +0200 Alin Nastac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul de Vrieze wrote: > > On Friday 10 November 2006 16:28, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 08:56 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: > >> > >>> Ok, the list definitely isn't accurate. If there is a

Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 1.x and GNOME 1.x dependent package masking

2006-11-11 Thread Alin Nastac
Paul de Vrieze wrote: > On Friday 10 November 2006 16:28, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > >> On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 08:56 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: >> >>> Ok, the list definitely isn't accurate. If there is a legitimate reason >>> to mask sylpheed-claws-1.x you also have to mask it's reverse dep

Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 1.x and GNOME 1.x dependent package masking

2006-11-11 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Friday 10 November 2006 16:28, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 08:56 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: > > Ok, the list definitely isn't accurate. If there is a legitimate reason > > to mask sylpheed-claws-1.x you also have to mask it's reverse deps. > > However I'm still waiting for t

[gentoo-dev] [ANNOUNCE] Anonymous CVS and SVN now available

2006-11-11 Thread Robin H. Johnson
All- KingTaco and I are pleased to announce that we've completed setting up and testing the anonymous read-only CVS and SVN services for Gentoo repositories, and that they are now available for use. The anonymous services are primarily intended help our non-dev contributors easily produce patches