Re: [gentoo-dev] /etc/udev/rules.d nightmare - orphaned files in /etc

2006-11-25 Thread Daniel Drake
Sven Köhler wrote: Have you ever thought about sollutions of that problem? It's not a real problem, that these files are orphaned - but they are neither removed nor renamed, so they stay in place and in one or the other way, they may start to disturb. Wasn't portage modified to remove unmodifie

Re: [gentoo-dev] /etc/udev/rules.d nightmare II - orphaned files return!

2006-11-25 Thread Drake Wyrm
Petteri R??ty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sven K??hler kirjoitti: > > i had some orphaned files in /etc/udev/rules.d. Namely 40-fuse.rules > > and 60-fuse.rules. > > > > The files were never removed, since they are protected - aren't > > they? > > Yeah config protected files are never removed. T

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: net-ftp/kbear; [due Christmas day :)]

2006-11-25 Thread Charlie Shepherd
net-ftp/kbear doesn't compile with gcc-4, has nothing depending on it and no upstream release since 2003. It will be punted on Christmas day, see bug 152525 for more information. -- -Charlie -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Alexander Gabert (pappy) returns from retirement

2006-11-25 Thread Alec Warner
Petteri Räty wrote: It is my pleasure to announce that Alexander "pappy" Gabert is returning from retirement to battle the hardened bugs. Retired sometime in 2004, he is now again interested in being blessed with a @gentoo.org email address. Nowadays he lives in Trier, Germany and is reaching hi

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Alexander Gabert (pappy) returns from retirement

2006-11-25 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Lisa Seelye wrote: Wow, welcome back pappy. Does it mean I've been around a long time when I remember his retirement? Well, I remember it, and when I became a dev, you had already been a dev for quiet a while :) -- Andrew Gaffneyhttp://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ Ge

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Alexander Gabert (pappy) returns from retirement

2006-11-25 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:01:34 + Lisa Seelye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Wow, welcome back pappy. Does it mean I've been around a long time | when I remember his retirement? Well it was a fairly memorable day :) -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail: ciaranm at ciaranm.org Web

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Alexander Gabert (pappy) returns from retirement

2006-11-25 Thread Lisa Seelye
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 21:01 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: > It is my pleasure to announce that Alexander "pappy" Gabert is returning > from retirement to battle the hardened bugs. Retired sometime in 2004, > he is now again interested in being blessed with a @gentoo.org email > address. > > Nowadays

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Alexander Gabert (pappy) returns from retirement

2006-11-25 Thread Petteri Räty
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti: > On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:01:50 +0200 Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | So please welcome pappy back to the dev community with the usual > | rites. > > Welcome back. It's good to see that the restrictions upon developers > returning have been lifted. > I was

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Alexander Gabert (pappy) returns from retirement

2006-11-25 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:01:50 +0200 Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | So please welcome pappy back to the dev community with the usual | rites. Welcome back. It's good to see that the restrictions upon developers returning have been lifted. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail: ciaranm

[gentoo-dev] New developer: Alexander Gabert (pappy) returns from retirement

2006-11-25 Thread Petteri Räty
It is my pleasure to announce that Alexander "pappy" Gabert is returning from retirement to battle the hardened bugs. Retired sometime in 2004, he is now again interested in being blessed with a @gentoo.org email address. Nowadays he lives in Trier, Germany and is reaching his thirties. That's abo

Re: [gentoo-dev] /etc/udev/rules.d nightmare - orphaned files in /etc

2006-11-25 Thread Petteri Räty
Sven Köhler kirjoitti: > Hi, > > i had some orphaned files in /etc/udev/rules.d. Namely 40-fuse.rules and > 60-fuse.rules. > > The files were never removed, since they are protected - aren't they? > Yeah config protected files are never removed. That is the whole point of configuration file pr

Re: [gentoo-dev] /etc/udev/rules.d nightmare - orphaned files in /etc

2006-11-25 Thread Jakub Moc
Sven Köhler napsal(a): > The files were never removed, since they are protected - aren't they? > Anyway, this really asks for a sollution. Feel free to solve Bug 8423 then... ;) http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8423 -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature:

[gentoo-dev] /etc/udev/rules.d nightmare - orphaned files in /etc

2006-11-25 Thread Sven Köhler
Hi, i had some orphaned files in /etc/udev/rules.d. Namely 40-fuse.rules and 60-fuse.rules. The files were never removed, since they are protected - aren't they? So that is _very_, _very_ unpractical, because the older your gentoo gets, the more of such orphaned files you get. Have you ever th

Re: [gentoo-dev] IMPORTANT: lists.g.o hardware issues

2006-11-25 Thread Lance Albertson
Lance Albertson wrote: > We've been having some hardware issues with the machine that runs > lists.g.o in the last week or so. Unfortunately, lcars (the person who > manages it) is going out of town this weekend and won't be able to > troubleshoot it while he's gone. Thankfully, the folks at GNi w

[gentoo-dev] Friendly reminder about "Mark stable on all arches"

2006-11-25 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Just to be safe, before this starts to be a habit. *Please don't do "ekeyword all" to mark stable on all arches a package. Whatever the package is.* First of all, there's no stable for Gentoo/FreeBSD, and even when there will be one, even for packages that have _no_ binary, and are just bash sc