Re: [gentoo-dev] New Bugday lead!
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 10:32:04PM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: > > Congratulations. > > Regards, > Petteri > Thanks a lot. If you guys are interested in bugday project, then have a look at this thread: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-522662.html Best regards, Alexander -- Alexander Færøy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo/MIPS, Gentoo/Alpha, User relations and Bugday. pgpcTFgXYWyuQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] New Bugday lead!
Bryan Østergaard kirjoitti: > Hi all. > > It's a pleassure to announce Alexander Færøy (eroyf) as the new Bugday > lead. He's been working hard the last several months to improve the > Bugday project. I'm sure he'll be able to carry on the project and get > lots of new, exciting ideas rolling. > > Regards, > Bryan Østergaard Congratulations. Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: spamc standalone package
* Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > is anyone else working on an standalone spamc package ? > > I've got several machines where I don't want to have the whole > > spamassassin installed - they're just calling an remote machine > > to do this work. > > Sounds like a good question for the Networking forum and/or gentoo-user > ML. meanwhile, I did the split and got it running (in-production) for a while. If you like, I could provide an ebuild for it. cu -- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ - Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ - -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] (open|strong)swan ipsec-config-path
Lars Weiler wrote:
> * Alin Năstac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06/12/07 08:37 +0200]:
>
>> I think strongswan's ebuild should be simplified.
>> I will bump openswan to 2.4.7 in a couple of days. Please use it as
>> starting point for your bump.
>>
>
> While we are at it: Should we keep installing the config
> into /etc/ipsec/ and create symlinks from /etc/ipsec.d ->
> /etc/ipsec/ipsec.d ? I think we are the only distro which
> installs the configs into /etc/ipsec, some others place
> ipsec.{conf,d,secrets} just into /etc
>
>
I find that useful. It is more easy to find ipsec related files this way.
Don't forget you can include other files into ipsec.conf. Custom updown
scripts can also be grouped this way.
If you feel we should drop /etc/ipsec directory, a poll on forums might
tell us what users want.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-dev] (open|strong)swan ipsec-config-path (was: Re: net-misc/openswan needs a maintainer)
* Alin Năstac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06/12/07 08:37 +0200]:
> I think strongswan's ebuild should be simplified.
> I will bump openswan to 2.4.7 in a couple of days. Please use it as
> starting point for your bump.
While we are at it: Should we keep installing the config
into /etc/ipsec/ and create symlinks from /etc/ipsec.d ->
/etc/ipsec/ipsec.d ? I think we are the only distro which
installs the configs into /etc/ipsec, some others place
ipsec.{conf,d,secrets} just into /etc
Regards, Lars
--
Lars Weiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +49-171-1963258
Gentoo Linux PowerPC: Strategical Lead and Release Engineer
Gentoo Infrastructure : CVS Administrator
pgpQKjXJiO9ZV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] net-misc/openswan needs a maintainer
* Alin Năstac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06/12/07 08:37 +0200]: > I think strongswan's ebuild should be simplified. Yep. I looked into it this morning. A lot of checks from the time before we had linux-info.eclass. Starting from scratch might be an option ;-) Regards, Lars -- Lars Weiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +49-171-1963258 Gentoo Linux PowerPC: Strategical Lead and Release Engineer Gentoo Infrastructure : CVS Administrator pgp5pWS3u8dZt.pgp Description: PGP signature
