On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 03:22:52 +0100
Piotr Jaroszyński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's seems to be needed sometimes b/c it does change the order of
> generated deplist(emerge -e world). AFAIK some packages dep on zlib
> b/c of that.
If you don't know about the unwritten yet near universal excepti
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 03:22:52 +0100 Piotr Jaroszyński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| > And, on a more general note, don't bother depending on a package
| > listed in base/packages. It's pointless and just create more noise.
|
| It's seems to be needed sometimes b/c it does change the order of
| gener
> And, on a more general note, don't bother depending on a package listed
> in base/packages. It's pointless and just create more noise.
It's seems to be needed sometimes b/c it does change the order of generated
deplist(emerge -e world). AFAIK some packages dep on zlib b/c of that.
--
Best Reg
And, on a more general note, don't bother depending on a package listed
in base/packages. It's pointless and just create more noise.
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:11:17 +
Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are a lot of packages in the tree which DEPEND on some version
> of sys-apps/
There are a lot of packages in the tree which DEPEND on some version of
sys-apps/portage, mostly for historical reasons. Try to avoid doing
this in your packages where possible -- if it's a genuine dependency
then obviously it should be there, but if the dep is only in the ebuild
to avoid hitting a
On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 11:39:28 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> media-gfx/pngtoico
I'm using this on a regular basis at work, so I'd be happy to pick it up.
There's even a new version out, so expect a version bump shortly.
Hans
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ryan Hill wrote:
> > I don't know what to do with unstaffed herds (eg. app-benchmarks).
> > I guess it'd be better to get the packages into the herd rather
> > than just leave them in maintainer-needed.
>
> I disagree, being in a herd gives people the
Ryan Hill wrote:
I don't know what to do with unstaffed herds (eg. app-benchmarks). I
guess it'd be better to get the packages into the herd rather than just
leave them in maintainer-needed.
I disagree, being in a herd gives people the impression that it's
maintained.
Thanks,
Donnie
--
gent
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Hello,
Until now gnupg-1.9/gnupg-2 serieses were installed side-by-site with
gnupg-1.4 series, and actually was depended on the old version.
Starting from gnupg-2.0.1-r1 (masked) app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.1-r1 is
configured to be a drop-in replacement.
It lacks the static use fla
I went through the list of packages currently in maintainer-needed
status and matched them up with possible homes. If your team is
interested in picking them up, feel free or just let me know and I'll
take care of it for you.
I don't know what to do with unstaffed herds (eg. app-benchmarks). I
g
Hello,
Until now gnupg-1.9/gnupg-2 serieses were installed side-by-site with
gnupg-1.4 series, and actually was depended on the old version.
Starting from gnupg-2.0.1-r1 (masked) app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.1-r1 is
configured to be a drop-in replacement.
It lacks the static use flag, I could not find a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Faulhammer) wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz schrieb:
> > Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> >> Nice idea, but you should really add no-herd as this
> >> is required if there is only a "maintainer".
> > Really? isn't valid? I'd rather see that than adding a
> > "fake" herd.
>
>
Timothy Redaelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can't fix rpath, application check its checksum
Bug #?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
can't fix rpath, application check its checksum
--
Timothy `Drizzt` Redaelli - http://drizzt.bsdnet.eu/blog/
FreeSBIE Developer, Gentoo Developer, GUFI Staff
There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
We don't believe this to be a coincidence. -- Jeremy S. Anderson
14 matches
Mail list logo
