[gentoo-dev] Re: Suggestion

2007-02-14 Thread Steve Long
On 2/8/07, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:38:08 +0100 Jose San Leandro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | A friend of mine and myself are willing to develop some tools to help | ebuild development. All the common cases should be handled by default functions, package

[gentoo-dev] Re: Network configuration and bash

2007-02-14 Thread Steve Long
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Michael Hanselmann wrote: XML! Actually, no. For me, libconfig[1] turned out to be very easy to work with. Its config file format is easy to write by hand and the parser resides in the library. [1]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Network configuration and bash

2007-02-14 Thread Roy Marples
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:12:20 + Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Michael Hanselmann wrote: XML! Actually, no. For me, libconfig[1] turned out to be very easy to work with. Its config file format is easy to write by hand

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-p2p/mnet

2007-02-14 Thread Raúl Porcel
# Raúl Porcel [EMAIL PROTECTED] (14 Feb 2007) # Doesn't build, upstream dead, network dead, bug 1666887 # Pending removal 13 Mar 2007 net-p2p/mnet -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-p2p/mnet

2007-02-14 Thread Harald van Dijk
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 08:47:20PM +0100, Raúl Porcel wrote: # Raúl Porcel [EMAIL PROTECTED] (14 Feb 2007) # Doesn't build, upstream dead, network dead, bug 1666887 # Pending removal 13 Mar 2007 net-p2p/mnet That's bug #166887; mnet may be broken, but it's not the incarnation of evil. :-)