# Mart Raudsepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (24 Feb 2007)
# Masked for removal on March 27th. Package doesn't run with
# wxpython >=2.6, upstream seems dead and it is reported to
# not work with python2.4. Bug #168259
net-p2p/kenosis
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:05:21 +0100 Thomas de Grenier de Latour
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| And now the open question for PMS people: is this worth being in
| EAPI-0, or is it just a Portage specific trick?
Personally I'd consider it to be a Portage trick. Other package
managers can do better by u
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:51:09 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| So with your DEPEND="|| ( tetex ptex )" case, you're saying that it
| is valid because the choice of tetex or ptex doesn't affect the
| resultant binaries? Extrapolating that, specifying link dependencies
| within an || co
Josh Saddler wrote:
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is an announcement that =net-nds/openldap-2.1* is going into p.mask
>> now, and will be removed in 30 days. It contains security
>> vulnerabilities that have been fixed in new major versions from
>> upstream, and upstream no longer pro
# Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (24 Feb 2007)
# Masked for removal. Package doesn't run with wxpython >=2.6
# (bug #159326), is unmaintained since Aug 2003 and broken
# (doesn't fetch the index file) since the method to fetch
# the index is deprecated.
app-misc/pyge
Possible replacements (non
On Friday 23 February 2007, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:08:48 +
>
> Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The example given in ebuild(5) is:
> > || (
> >
> > sdl? ( media-libs/libsdl )
> > svga? ( media-libs/svgalib )
> > opengl? ( virtual
On Saturday 24 February 2007, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Saturday 24 February 2007 12:34, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:27:35 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > wrote:
> > | For the 14 cases you mentioned that were making a mistake, they
> > | probably can be rewritten
On Friday 23 February 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 01:40 +0100, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> > And I'd be fond of having all the -ffast-math filtering ripped out of the
> > tree as well.
>
> Except some things really do not compile with it enabled. Now, if
> you're meaning you'
Zac Medico wrote:
> The DOC_SYMLINKS_DIR variable is intended to solve that problem (new
> in portage-2.1.2). It is documented in `man make.conf`.
Thanks, that's exactly what I was looking for.
--
by design, by neglect
dirtyepic gentoo orgfor
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 03:23:28AM -0800, Josh Saddler wrote:
> Er. Granted, they're out of date, because we don't have anyone who knows
> ldap (and gongloo never showed up with a promised rewrite), but all of
> our documentation seems to be geared toward openldap-2.1 or so.
>
> http://www.gentoo.
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is an announcement that =net-nds/openldap-2.1* is going into p.mask
> now, and will be removed in 30 days. It contains security
> vulnerabilities that have been fixed in new major versions from
> upstream, and upstream no longer provides support for it.
>
>
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 21:31:51 -0600, Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Some additional infos about this DOC_SYMLINKS_DIR feature, since it
seems the ebuild(5) doc has not been merged:
- the symlinks are not automatically created to any /usr/share/doc/
subdir that the ebuild creates, but only t
Hi,
This is an announcement that =net-nds/openldap-2.1* is going into p.mask
now, and will be removed in 30 days. It contains security
vulnerabilities that have been fixed in new major versions from
upstream, and upstream no longer provides support for it.
In the same vein, =net-nds/openldap-2.2*
William Hubbs wrote:
Where do I find information on how to fix the package?
If you don't have a box using a multilib profile (I guess the user who
filed the bug was using an AMD64 box), you won't be able to reproduce
it. Just reassign the bug to [EMAIL PROTECTED], we'll fix it :)
Regards,
William Hubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:27:38 -0600:
> I'm not familiar with this test, and I jhave a bug against one of the
> packages I maintain that says it fails for e package.
>
> Where do I find information on how to fix the packa
15 matches
Mail list logo
