[gentoo-dev] What do you think about removing gtk-1.2 theme engines from tree?
What do YOU think about removing these from tree? gtk-engines/gtk-engines-0.12.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* gtk-engines-begtk/gtk-engines-begtk-1.0.1-r2.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* gtk-engines-cleanice/gtk-engines-cleanice-0.8.5.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* gtk-engines-cleanice/gtk-engines-cleanice-0.8.5-r1.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* gtk-engines-dwerg/gtk-engines-dwerg-0.6.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.3.15 gtk-engines-dwerg/gtk-engines-dwerg-0.8.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.3.15 gtk-engines-flat/gtk-engines-flat-0.1-r1.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* gtk-engines-flat/gtk-engines-flat-0.1.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* gtk-engines-gtkstep/gtk-engines-gtkstep-2.0.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* gtk-engines-icegradient/gtk-engines-icegradient-0.0.5-r2.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* gtk-engines-industrial/gtk-engines-industrial-0.2.36.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* gtk-engines-lighthouseblue/gtk-engines-lighthouseblue-0.6.3.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* gtk-engines-mac2/gtk-engines-mac2-1.0.3-r2.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* gtk-engines-mist/gtk-engines-mist-0.10-r2.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* gtk-engines-notif2/gtk-engines-notif2-1.0.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* gtk-engines-notif2/gtk-engines-notif2-1.0-r1.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* gtk-engines-thinice/gtk-engines-thinice-1.0.4-r1.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* gtk-engines-xenophilia/gtk-engines-xenophilia-0.8-r1.ebuild: =x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* Related picture, http://www.acc.umu.se/~zqad/cats/?view=1163919784-cat-detonator.jpg - drac -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] What do you think about removing gtk-1.2 theme engines from tree?
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:43:10 +0200 Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What do YOU think about removing these from tree? gtk-engines/gtk-engines-0.12.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* gtk-engines-begtk/gtk-engines-begtk-1.0.1-r2.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* [snip] As long as we have GTK+-1.2 in the tree, I'd rather keep them in. Kind regards, -- Andrej Ticho Kacian ticho at gentoo dot org Gentoo Linux Developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] What do you think about removing gtk-1.2 theme engines from tree?
maillog: 25/02/2007-13:53:18(+0100): Andrej Kacian types On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:43:10 +0200 Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What do YOU think about removing these from tree? gtk-engines/gtk-engines-0.12.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* gtk-engines-begtk/gtk-engines-begtk-1.0.1-r2.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* [snip] As long as we have GTK+-1.2 in the tree, I'd rather keep them in. I think that was sort of the point. Did you see that last one in the list. :) -- / Georgi Georgiev/ Am I SHOPLIFTING? / \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]\ \ / http://www.gg3.net/ / / pgpD4S9z6TKR4.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] What do you think about removing gtk-1.2 theme engines from tree?
maillog: 25/02/2007-22:38:54(+0900): Георги Георгиев types maillog: 25/02/2007-13:53:18(+0100): Andrej Kacian types On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:43:10 +0200 Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What do YOU think about removing these from tree? gtk-engines/gtk-engines-0.12.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* gtk-engines-begtk/gtk-engines-begtk-1.0.1-r2.ebuild:DEPEND==x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* [snip] As long as we have GTK+-1.2 in the tree, I'd rather keep them in. I think that was sort of the point. Did you see that last one in the list. :) Ooops, my wrong, it was all bad wrapping. I should really stop rushing replies. -- (* Georgi Georgiev (* Zapp: You win again, gravity! (* *)[EMAIL PROTECTED]*)*) (* http://www.gg3.net/ (*(* -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)
Steve Long wrote: Stephen P. Becker wrote: All of that said, how about we clear up all of the misinformation about how arch keywording really works, how deps get wrongly dropped, and then explain why mips has generally fallen behind. This isn't an excuse, but is merely a statement of facts which describe the situation. Thanks for the clear explanation of the process; it helps to put this in context for non-devs. Not only non-devs. Well done. -- by design, by neglect dirtyepic gentoo orgfor a fact or just for effect 9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] custom-cflags global USE
Carsten Lohrke wrote: And I'd be fond of having all the -ffast-math filtering ripped out of the tree as well. Please include -ftree-vectorize and -ftree-loop-linear along with that. I've yet to see a GCC release where they work correctly, including 4.2. -- by design, by neglect dirtyepic gentoo orgfor a fact or just for effect 9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-dev] Re: What do you think about removing gtk-1.2 theme engines from tree?
Samuli Suominen wrote: What do YOU think about removing these from tree? *I* think it's a great idea, but *I* may be heavily medicated at the moment. Seriously, IMHO the less we have depending on GTK+-1 the better. Others will disagree loudly. Related picture, http://www.acc.umu.se/~zqad/cats/?view=1163919784-cat-detonator.jpg Oh noes! -- by design, by neglect dirtyepic gentoo orgfor a fact or just for effect 9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: xfce-extra/xfce4-websearch
Last riting.. # Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (24 Feb 2007) # Has no stable keywords and is not ported to Xfce 4.4. # Masked for removal. xfce-extra/xfce4-websearch - drac -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: EAPI spec (was Re: Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs))
Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 04:13 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | and Gianelloni for the infrastructure. And what on earth do infrastructure have to do with a package manager specification? Especially considering that I am not an infrastructure guy. I'll be honest. I'm not concerned personally with the *contents* of the package manager specification, since I know it will end up being reviewed by many. What I am mostly concerned with is making sure that we're moving forward as efficiently as possible. I want this spec so we can all get cracking on making everything support it. The contents itself I leave to more capable hands. I'll be reviewing it when it is released, but that's only just to assist in the process. Um I put it badly, sorry (i've had the flu) - I meant Chris in his capacity of releng, catalyst etc. You only want to review, np. ++ to moving ahead. And yeah, ferringb had it right- it was about having several perspectives on this rather than just paludis devs. And irrespective of whether bug-wranglers have much to say, I'd still want them involved, as they deal with the ebuild bugs. As such they could well have ideas or viewpoints which would help. Even if they don't, it's how I'd do it for any software development project- not having testing/ QA/ bug fixers involved would leave me uneasy. The PMS will presumably be the definitive statement of what should happen for *all* gentoo PMs, and it so happens that the people who are doing it are mostly paludis devs, and sorry it won't be ready til Paludis is. pfft. I don't buy the stuff about needing the so-called independent implementation sorry. ``What people think is allowed rather than what is?'' The spec defines what is allowed. Period. Further, I don't recollect any discussion about needing an independent implementation when this was first mooted, and spb took it on. Or am I wrong- was it in fact understood that the spec would need paludis before it could be considered correct? And that still leaves the issue of EAPI 0 being the preexisting implementation. What exactly is so wrong with that? Like I said, tho, I'm happy if the council is. Although I'm starting to worry at the increasingly poisonous atmosphere, and that devs are leaving. Flameeyes was on the council, no? It concerns me that this atmosphere is just intimidating people simply because no one feels confident to stand up to abusive bullying. Personally, I'd like to see ferringb and zmedico's take on what the PMS should be. (Not that they want to do it.) I sincerely doubt it would take them anything like as long ;) BTW if i preface a statement with `personally' that means it's just my gut feeling. It doesn't mean that I think it /has/ to be done like that. Sorry to explain the obvious.. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: EAPI spec (was Re: Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs))
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:51:51 + Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Like I said, tho, I'm happy if the council is. Although I'm starting to worry at the increasingly poisonous atmosphere, and that devs are leaving. Flameeyes was on the council, no? It concerns me that this atmosphere is just intimidating people simply because no one feels confident to stand up to abusive bullying. Diego left because he was simply burnt out, as suggested by his many blog posts. As for the poisonous atmosphere - I don't know, I feel very good among the developers, and am still enjoying working on the tree just like on the day I joined. Don't let few loud flamers ruin your day. Kind regards, -- Andrej Ticho Kacian ticho at gentoo dot org Gentoo Linux Developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: EAPI spec (was Re: Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs))
Andrej Kacian wrote: As for the poisonous atmosphere - I don't know, I feel very good among the developers, and am still enjoying working on the tree just like on the day I joined. Don't let few loud flamers ruin your day. Thanks for that Andrej. Makes me feel much better :) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Re: What do you think about removing gtk-1.2 theme engines from tree?
Andrej Kacian [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 25 Feb 2007 17:07:55 +0100: On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 09:37:33 -0600 Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seriously, IMHO the less we have depending on GTK+-1 the better. Others will disagree loudly. It makes sense slowly removing *applications* depending on gtk1. Themes should go last, along with gtk1 itself. Gtk1 is already ugly enough, do you want it to be even more ugly? I think the idea is that it helps discourage new uptake, since it is on its way to eventual removal. Keep in mind that those who have it already merged along with their favorite theme can keep them in overlay, so removing the themes from the tree simply keeps new users from merging something that's already on its way out, only to have to deal with its removal relatively soon (months?) thereafter. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master. Richard Stallman -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: EAPI spec (was Re: Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs))
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:51:51 + Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And irrespective of whether bug-wranglers have much to say, I'd still want them involved, as they deal with the ebuild bugs. As such they could well have ideas or viewpoints which would help. Even if they don't, it's how I'd do it for any software development project- not having testing/ QA/ bug fixers involved would leave me uneasy. bug-wranglers don't really have much to do with QA, their main job is just to assign bugs to the right people, and that doesn't have anything to do with a package manager specification (at most you could argue about the metadata.xml format, but even that is a long shot). I don't buy the stuff about needing the so-called independent implementation sorry. ``What people think is allowed rather than what is?'' The spec defines what is allowed. Period. Thing is that if you only have a single implementation it's much easier for errors to slip by due to implicit assumptions. Unless you write a full compliance testsuite ... And that still leaves the issue of EAPI 0 being the preexisting implementation. What exactly is so wrong with that? Which implementation exactly? Portage isn't frozen, the behavioris more less constantly changing. Another issue are the things that just work by accident or only exist for legacy reasons, you don't really want those in a formal spec aimed at future developments. Also in general it's easier to extend a spec than to restrict it later on, no matter what the spec is about. Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2007-02-25 23h59 UTC
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2007-02-25 23h59 UTC. Removals: dev-lang/tolua 2007-02-19 23:34:16 mabi dev-lang/lua-wrapper2007-02-20 00:00:41 mabi media-video/nvidia-freebsd 2007-02-20 09:57:03 drizzt net-firewall/firestorm 2007-02-20 12:05:44 armin76 net-p2p/g2gui 2007-02-20 12:10:00 armin76 net-p2p/bittorrent-stats2007-02-20 12:11:31 armin76 media-sound/amp 2007-02-20 23:05:50 wolf31o2 app-emulation/winex 2007-02-21 02:22:16 vapier app-emulation/winex-cvs 2007-02-21 02:22:16 vapier app-antivirus/vlnx 2007-02-22 12:42:26 drizzt Additions: sci-libs/ufconfig 2007-02-19 10:21:15 bicatali sci-libs/amd2007-02-19 10:32:00 bicatali sci-libs/umfpack2007-02-19 10:39:50 bicatali games-action/astromenace-bin2007-02-19 16:54:16 mr_bones_ dev-php5/php-gtk2007-02-20 16:40:23 anant sys-auth/thinkfinger2007-02-21 16:40:45 chainsaw games-puzzle/picpuz 2007-02-21 18:36:38 mr_bones_ net-irc/ii 2007-02-22 12:29:29 armin76 x11-plugins/gkrellm-cpufreq 2007-02-23 00:27:58 lack sci-libs/qfits 2007-02-23 00:48:16 bicatali x11-plugins/gkrellm-timers 2007-02-23 01:32:10 lack sci-libs/minuit 2007-02-23 01:52:46 bicatali mail-filter/spamassassin-botnet 2007-02-23 03:27:00 chutzpah games-sports/sturmbahnfahrer2007-02-23 05:19:02 mr_bones_ -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux Developer E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 Removed Packages: dev-lang/tolua,removed,mabi,2007-02-19 23:34:16 dev-lang/lua-wrapper,removed,mabi,2007-02-20 00:00:41 media-video/nvidia-freebsd,removed,drizzt,2007-02-20 09:57:03 net-firewall/firestorm,removed,armin76,2007-02-20 12:05:44 net-p2p/g2gui,removed,armin76,2007-02-20 12:10:00 net-p2p/bittorrent-stats,removed,armin76,2007-02-20 12:11:31 media-sound/amp,removed,wolf31o2,2007-02-20 23:05:50 app-emulation/winex,removed,vapier,2007-02-21 02:22:16 app-emulation/winex-cvs,removed,vapier,2007-02-21 02:22:16 app-antivirus/vlnx,removed,drizzt,2007-02-22 12:42:26 Added Packages: sci-libs/ufconfig,added,bicatali,2007-02-19 10:21:15 sci-libs/amd,added,bicatali,2007-02-19 10:32:00 sci-libs/umfpack,added,bicatali,2007-02-19 10:39:50 games-action/astromenace-bin,added,mr_bones_,2007-02-19 16:54:16 dev-php5/php-gtk,added,anant,2007-02-20 16:40:23 sys-auth/thinkfinger,added,chainsaw,2007-02-21 16:40:45 games-puzzle/picpuz,added,mr_bones_,2007-02-21 18:36:38 net-irc/ii,added,armin76,2007-02-22 12:29:29 x11-plugins/gkrellm-cpufreq,added,lack,2007-02-23 00:27:58 sci-libs/qfits,added,bicatali,2007-02-23 00:48:16 x11-plugins/gkrellm-timers,added,lack,2007-02-23 01:32:10 sci-libs/minuit,added,bicatali,2007-02-23 01:52:46 mail-filter/spamassassin-botnet,added,chutzpah,2007-02-23 03:27:00 games-sports/sturmbahnfahrer,added,mr_bones_,2007-02-23 05:19:02 Done.
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] mask and force various profile specific USE flags
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 15:22:34 -0800 Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | In order to do this, selected profile specific flags should be | masked in the base profile and unmasked/forced in the specific | profiles which they apply to. The unmasking is necessary because | use.mask currently overrides use.force. USE flags suggested as | candidates for masking/forcing include all USE_EXPAND flags derived | from the USERLAND, KERNEL, and ELIBC variables. ...and ARCH, since it seems not all profiles mask all archs... Given the current single-inheritance profile structure and the way that many leaf profiles define an ARCH that is different from their parent profile, it will require ARCH masking/forcing in approximately 80 different individual profiles. I'm not sure if it's really worth it. When we start using multiple-inheritance, we can define ARCH specific profiles that those 80 different individual profiles can inherit their ARCH masking/forcing from. Another alternative is to have the package manager do ARCH masking/forcing automatically where appropriate. I'm not sure if it's a good idea to hardcode something like that though. If we want to implement this, one problem with the current profiles is that default-darwin/macos uses ARCH=ppc and ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=ppc-macos, where both ppc and ppc-macos are currently listed in arch.list. However, this profile is exceptional and it is gradually being phased out of the gentoo-x86 tree as macos users migrate to the prefix branch of portage. Zac -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF4i0A/ejvha5XGaMRArbbAKChecUUm0T83iDzo7MxW1qEL+Tb9wCgocPO a2SUXF652qY8xGrnLaIBpmo= =NZfE -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: EAPI spec (was Re: Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs))
Steve Long wrote: Andrej Kacian wrote: As for the poisonous atmosphere - I don't know, I feel very good among the developers, and am still enjoying working on the tree just like on the day I joined. Don't let few loud flamers ruin your day. Thanks for that Andrej. Makes me feel much better :) FWIW, I was sad to see flameeyes retire, but it's clear that wasn't a spur of the moment decision. I have had great experiences working with many developers, including getting some constructive criticism at times (hi, dev-zero!). Overall, I have found the atmosphere in IRC and elsewhere quite pleasant. Thanks, Marty -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2007-02-25 23h59 UTC
Something is wrong with this list (there are some other removals I know took place that do not seem to be listed). Please ignore while I trace why. On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 12:15:01AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2007-02-25 23h59 UTC. Removals: dev-lang/tolua2007-02-19 23:34:16 mabi dev-lang/lua-wrapper 2007-02-20 00:00:41 mabi media-video/nvidia-freebsd2007-02-20 09:57:03 drizzt net-firewall/firestorm2007-02-20 12:05:44 armin76 net-p2p/g2gui 2007-02-20 12:10:00 armin76 net-p2p/bittorrent-stats 2007-02-20 12:11:31 armin76 media-sound/amp 2007-02-20 23:05:50 wolf31o2 app-emulation/winex 2007-02-21 02:22:16 vapier app-emulation/winex-cvs 2007-02-21 02:22:16 vapier app-antivirus/vlnx2007-02-22 12:42:26 drizzt Additions: sci-libs/ufconfig 2007-02-19 10:21:15 bicatali sci-libs/amd 2007-02-19 10:32:00 bicatali sci-libs/umfpack 2007-02-19 10:39:50 bicatali games-action/astromenace-bin 2007-02-19 16:54:16 mr_bones_ dev-php5/php-gtk 2007-02-20 16:40:23 anant sys-auth/thinkfinger 2007-02-21 16:40:45 chainsaw games-puzzle/picpuz 2007-02-21 18:36:38 mr_bones_ net-irc/ii2007-02-22 12:29:29 armin76 x11-plugins/gkrellm-cpufreq 2007-02-23 00:27:58 lack sci-libs/qfits2007-02-23 00:48:16 bicatali x11-plugins/gkrellm-timers2007-02-23 01:32:10 lack sci-libs/minuit 2007-02-23 01:52:46 bicatali mail-filter/spamassassin-botnet 2007-02-23 03:27:00 chutzpah games-sports/sturmbahnfahrer 2007-02-23 05:19:02 mr_bones_ -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux Developer E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 pgpTKQWxw7BVJ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] mask and force various profile specific USE flags
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 16:42 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 15:22:34 -0800 Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | In order to do this, selected profile specific flags should be | masked in the base profile and unmasked/forced in the specific | profiles which they apply to. The unmasking is necessary because | use.mask currently overrides use.force. USE flags suggested as | candidates for masking/forcing include all USE_EXPAND flags derived | from the USERLAND, KERNEL, and ELIBC variables. ...and ARCH, since it seems not all profiles mask all archs... Given the current single-inheritance profile structure and the way that many leaf profiles define an ARCH that is different from their parent profile, it will require ARCH masking/forcing in approximately 80 different individual profiles. I'm not sure if it's really worth it. When we start using multiple-inheritance, we can define ARCH specific profiles that those 80 different individual profiles can inherit their ARCH masking/forcing from. We're (Release Engineering) trying to use them now. Since I took the 2007.0 snapshot, I have been working on replacing all of the 2007.0 profiles into a multi-parent version of said profiles. This includes all of the required parents, such as base/default-linux/etc. While we aren't planning on requiring using them for this release, I'm trying to get them done and will be building some experimental stages based on them. Depending on how easy it ends up being, we might just use them for the release itself. They should be quite simple, at least for default-linux and its children. I'm putting in everything that is currently in the tree into my multi-parent profile group. Since I don't have to make any changes to the current profiles, it can live side-by-side in the tree with no adverse consequences, other than people having make certain commits in two places until we phase out the old profiles. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2007-02-25 23h59 UTC
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2007-02-25 23h59 UTC. Removals: dev-lang/tolua 2007-02-19 23:34:16 mabi dev-lang/lua-wrapper2007-02-20 00:00:41 mabi media-video/nvidia-freebsd 2007-02-20 09:57:03 drizzt net-firewall/firestorm 2007-02-20 12:05:44 armin76 net-p2p/g2gui 2007-02-20 12:10:00 armin76 net-p2p/bittorrent-stats2007-02-20 12:11:31 armin76 media-sound/amp 2007-02-20 23:05:50 wolf31o2 app-emulation/winex 2007-02-21 02:22:16 vapier app-emulation/winex-cvs 2007-02-21 02:22:16 vapier app-antivirus/vlnx 2007-02-22 12:42:26 drizzt sys-apps/perfctr2007-02-25 01:37:18 robbat2 Additions: sci-libs/ufconfig 2007-02-19 10:21:15 bicatali sci-libs/amd2007-02-19 10:32:00 bicatali sci-libs/umfpack2007-02-19 10:39:50 bicatali games-action/astromenace-bin2007-02-19 16:54:16 mr_bones_ dev-php5/php-gtk2007-02-20 16:40:23 anant sys-auth/thinkfinger2007-02-21 16:40:45 chainsaw games-puzzle/picpuz 2007-02-21 18:36:38 mr_bones_ net-irc/ii 2007-02-22 12:29:29 armin76 x11-plugins/gkrellm-cpufreq 2007-02-23 00:27:58 lack sci-libs/qfits 2007-02-23 00:48:16 bicatali x11-plugins/gkrellm-timers 2007-02-23 01:32:10 lack sci-libs/minuit 2007-02-23 01:52:46 bicatali mail-filter/spamassassin-botnet 2007-02-23 03:27:00 chutzpah games-sports/sturmbahnfahrer2007-02-23 05:19:02 mr_bones_ sci-mathematics/wxmaxima2007-02-23 11:33:05 bicatali sci-visualization/hippodraw 2007-02-23 15:12:58 bicatali x11-plugins/gkrellfire 2007-02-23 16:29:13 lack x11-plugins/gkrellm-gkfreq 2007-02-23 17:46:52 lack x11-plugins/gkrellm-bluez 2007-02-23 18:18:58 lack dev-python/basemap-data 2007-02-24 00:50:49 bicatali dev-python/basemap 2007-02-24 01:02:33 bicatali dev-ruby/mime-types 2007-02-24 12:23:07 graaff dev-ruby/rflickr2007-02-24 12:27:30 graaff games-fps/alienarena2007-02-25 10:15:30 nyhm -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux Developer E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 Removed Packages: dev-lang/tolua,removed,mabi,2007-02-19 23:34:16 dev-lang/lua-wrapper,removed,mabi,2007-02-20 00:00:41 media-video/nvidia-freebsd,removed,drizzt,2007-02-20 09:57:03 net-firewall/firestorm,removed,armin76,2007-02-20 12:05:44 net-p2p/g2gui,removed,armin76,2007-02-20 12:10:00 net-p2p/bittorrent-stats,removed,armin76,2007-02-20 12:11:31 media-sound/amp,removed,wolf31o2,2007-02-20 23:05:50 app-emulation/winex,removed,vapier,2007-02-21 02:22:16 app-emulation/winex-cvs,removed,vapier,2007-02-21 02:22:16 app-antivirus/vlnx,removed,drizzt,2007-02-22 12:42:26 sys-apps/perfctr,removed,robbat2,2007-02-25 01:37:18 Added Packages: sci-libs/ufconfig,added,bicatali,2007-02-19 10:21:15 sci-libs/amd,added,bicatali,2007-02-19 10:32:00 sci-libs/umfpack,added,bicatali,2007-02-19 10:39:50 games-action/astromenace-bin,added,mr_bones_,2007-02-19 16:54:16 dev-php5/php-gtk,added,anant,2007-02-20 16:40:23 sys-auth/thinkfinger,added,chainsaw,2007-02-21 16:40:45 games-puzzle/picpuz,added,mr_bones_,2007-02-21 18:36:38 net-irc/ii,added,armin76,2007-02-22 12:29:29 x11-plugins/gkrellm-cpufreq,added,lack,2007-02-23 00:27:58 sci-libs/qfits,added,bicatali,2007-02-23 00:48:16 x11-plugins/gkrellm-timers,added,lack,2007-02-23 01:32:10 sci-libs/minuit,added,bicatali,2007-02-23 01:52:46 mail-filter/spamassassin-botnet,added,chutzpah,2007-02-23 03:27:00 games-sports/sturmbahnfahrer,added,mr_bones_,2007-02-23 05:19:02 sci-mathematics/wxmaxima,added,bicatali,2007-02-23 11:33:05 sci-visualization/hippodraw,added,bicatali,2007-02-23 15:12:58 x11-plugins/gkrellfire,added,lack,2007-02-23 16:29:13 x11-plugins/gkrellm-gkfreq,added,lack,2007-02-23 17:46:52 x11-plugins/gkrellm-bluez,added,lack,2007-02-23 18:18:58 dev-python/basemap-data,added,bicatali,2007-02-24 00:50:49 dev-python/basemap,added,bicatali,2007-02-24 01:02:33 dev-ruby/mime-types,added,graaff,2007-02-24 12:23:07 dev-ruby/rflickr,added,graaff,2007-02-24 12:27:30 games-fps/alienarena,added,nyhm,2007-02-25 10:15:30 Done.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2007-02-25 23h59 UTC
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 18:09 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote: Something is wrong with this list (there are some other removals I know took place that do not seem to be listed). Please ignore while I trace why. DAMN YOU!!! Heh... just kidding. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2007-02-25 23h59 UTC
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:34:32PM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 18:09 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote: Something is wrong with this list (there are some other removals I know took place that do not seem to be listed). Please ignore while I trace why. DAMN YOU!!! Heh... just kidding. Hey, the second one came through already with the correct results. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux Developer E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 pgpIfTJVfnWe4.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] add bzip2/zlib to default USE in default-linux
most arches have bzip2/zlib in default-linux/arch/make.defaults so why not just move it to default-linux/make.defaults -mike pgpFTNngzdyJf.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: What do you think about removing gtk-1.2 theme engines from tree?
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:10:16 + (UTC) Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Keep in mind that those who have it already merged along with their favorite theme can keep them in overlay, so removing the themes from the tree simply keeps new users from merging something that's already on its way out, only to have to deal with its removal relatively soon (months?) thereafter. Um, you're contradicting yourself here. If new users install the themes, they can go on using them after they're removed just as those who already have it installed. The point I was trying to make is that themes are in fact (optional) support packages for gtk1, not real applications using it, and should only be removed once the library itself goes away. Kind regards, -- Andrej Ticho Kacian ticho at gentoo dot org Gentoo Linux Developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] add bzip2/zlib to default USE in default-linux
hal cannot install when one dependencie built with zlib USE flag.. Mike Frysinger írta: most arches have bzip2/zlib in default-linux/arch/make.defaults so why not just move it to default-linux/make.defaults -mike signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] add bzip2/zlib to default USE in default-linux
Tóth Csaba wrote: hal cannot install when one dependencie built with zlib USE flag.. Hal should be fixed then... lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] add bzip2/zlib to default USE in default-linux
Luca Barbato wrote: Tóth Csaba wrote: hal cannot install when one dependencie built with zlib USE flag.. Hal should be fixed then... lu We've already been arguing about this on the bug, can we please not bring it here... -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
