This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the
2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Gentoo dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was wondering what is keeping us from releasing a minimal install cd more
often than we do now.
Isn't almost everything needed for it already in the stable tree and thus
tested? And if so isn't
it possible to fully automate generation of these
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
I was wondering what is keeping us from releasing a minimal install cd more
often than we do now.
Isn't almost everything needed for it already in the stable tree and thus
tested? And if so isn't
it possible to fully automate generation of these cd's?
Time and
To follow up to this, I am planning on package.masking sys-libs/db 4.0 and 4.1
sometime in the near future, to be followed up by their removal in ~30 days.
If this poses a problem to you, a package you maintain, one of your family
members,
or some exotic animal you may or may not own, please let
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
I was wondering what is keeping us from releasing a minimal install cd more
often than we do now.
Isn't almost everything needed for it already in the stable tree and thus
tested? And if so isn't
it possible to fully automate generation of these cd's?
I'd
Tiziano Mueller wrote:
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
I was wondering what is keeping us from releasing a minimal install cd more
often than we do now.
Isn't almost everything needed for it already in the stable tree and thus
tested? And if so isn't
it possible to fully automate generation of
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 11:49:25AM +0100, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
I was wondering what is keeping us from releasing a minimal install cd more
often than we do now.
Isn't almost everything needed for it already in the stable tree and thus
tested? And if so isn't
it possible to fully
Hello everybody :)
I'd like to argue about this problem, since my point of view slightly
differs about this problem.
I think that releasing installation media more often would make sense,
more than in the case of stages. I wrote a small article a few weeks ago,
about the Small Gentoo LiveCD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
Also, what's the point? Everything you use to install from the minimal
is fetched from the internet. The only thing that an updated minimal
would give us is a slightly more hardware support during the install.
This slightly
I personnally would like to see stage tarballs updated more frequently
if an arch receives a major update in system, like gcc or glibc, even
if this is only an r patch because these are a pain to install, and by
update I mean something new goes stable. Such releases are infrequent,
but make it
Simon Stelling wrote:
That being said, I think this is really up to the releng team and noone
else. They are doing the work, so we can discuss it far and wide, as
long as releng doesn't want to do it, nothing will happen. So maybe we
should wait for a statement from Chris before doing anything
I just want to point out that I have gone through 4 years of
gcc/glibc/binutils/baselayout/udev/etc. updates on 8 production servers
with varying hardware _with the hardened profile_ and I've never had to
re-emerge world once.
In addition, I don't see a huge drawback to using other distro's
Cory Visi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In addition, I don't see a huge drawback to using other distro's LiveCDs.
Some distros specialize in making a LiveCD do everything possible, like
Knoppix. This group isn't maintaining a portage tree, they are just making
their LiveCD awesome. Why not
Simon Stelling wrote:
That being said, I think this is really up to the releng team and noone
else. They are doing the work, so we can discuss it far and wide, as
long as releng doesn't want to do it, nothing will happen. So maybe we
should wait for a statement from Chris before doing
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
As opposed to minimal CDs, I would see weekly builds of stage3 tarballs
to be much more useful.
++ on that. Rebuilding _everything_ because openssl changed ABI since
the last stage3 install could save users a lot of time/trouble. (that
was just an example)
Weekly,
Rémi Cardona wrote:
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
As opposed to minimal CDs, I would see weekly builds of stage3 tarballs
to be much more useful.
++ on that. Rebuilding _everything_ because openssl changed ABI since
the last stage3 install could save users a lot of time/trouble. (that
was just an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
please ignore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF5zr/R6N46HXxiJERAuxMAKC8mIzInQr5FxEsUpFOXUpUAsl7MACg1rCD
RHlpGDlfMBicuIsvzPokXEY=
=wUsp
-END PGP
Cory Visi wrote:
In addition, I don't see a huge drawback to using other distro's LiveCDs.
I tried to install a system with a marvell pata drive, no livecd I know
of managed to run because they couldn't find the cdrom. the system was
to be installed using debian and had windows installed, the
please ignore
if you wanted to test wether you successfully registered you could also have
waited 12 hours, that is, you could have waited for as long as you would
expect it to take unitl the next mail is sent to this list, which is unlikely
to be longer than 12hrs.
cheers,
daniel
--
Please give the usual warm welcome to Matt aetius Drew. Matt pings us
from Durham, North Carolina, USA. He says he lacks the skills that make
someone a software engineer as opposed to a programmer. Well I hope he
has never looked at Portage code.
Insert random quotes:
My best area of expertise is
20 matches
Mail list logo
