Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Hiatus (sort of)
070625 Paul de Vrieze wrote: Now from Hobart, Tasmania (Australia) Don't let the wolves devils get you (grin). -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban Community Studies TRANSIT`-O--O---' University of Toronto -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: RFC: Unifying the behavior of the doc use flag and document it
Steve Long wrote: Kent Fredric wrote: ++ I was only thinking of the programmer:user difference, since code docs tend to pull in a lot of stuff, where as end-user docs are normally supplied in an easier format (eg not dox ;) rebuild-docs as a one-shot flag is great. Would there be a way to control what kind of markup is output (assuming a package supports it)? For example, to specify that files should be for text-only or graphical browser (where both would be the default.) XeTeX -- PS -- PDF is another along those lines. I can just feel a USE expansion coming on. DOC=none pdf txt man ps html info all rebuild sounds like just a bunch for starters. Any votees? Not me, I'm afraid, unless this is the only way to do it.. I agree that they should only apply to single packages, not across the tree. Although, if I'm honest, I don't know what that breaks. Hmm I've been thinking on this a bit more, and I think it does generalise well in user terms. After all, if I want documents in text only format for an installation, it applies to all packages. What concerned me more was 1) whether it would expand to all by default, as other expansions do (not so major with profiles perhaps?) and 2) being able to override if we do want eg html for a package we develop with. But according to ivanm, you can override with package.use e.g. linguas_en_gb so long as you know the prefix (ie doc_). So consider that a positive vote from me :) Though I must stress I want tex in there ;) Useful tip btw: ivanm if you have udept emerged, then doing dep -u package name will tell you _all_ the use vars, including the expanded ones -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] app-xemacs/cc-mode not in package app-xemacs/xemacs
I was wondering why the app-xemacs/xemacs package doesn't include the cc-mode package since it is widely used. I had some real troubles figuring this out (mostly since im not very familiar with the portage system). It should just seem natural that it would be. -- Udo
Re: [gentoo-dev] app-xemacs/cc-mode not in package app-xemacs/xemacs
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 02:13:16 +0200 John-John Tedro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was wondering why the app-xemacs/xemacs package doesn't include the cc-mode package since it is widely used. I had some real troubles figuring this out (mostly since im not very familiar with the portage system). It should just seem natural that it would be. Gentoo has a tendency to split packages rather than include them. [1] has information about all the Gentoo supported packages, and then there are options like `emerge -S string` and specially target utilities like app-portage/eix to help you find packages you need: $ eix cc-mode * app-emacs/cc-mode Available versions: ~5.31.3 Homepage:http://cc-mode.sourceforge.net Description: An Emacs mode for editing C and other languages with similar syntax. * app-xemacs/cc-mode Available versions: 1.32 1.45 Homepage:http://xemacs.org/ Description: C, C++ and Java language support. Found 2 matches. Kind regards, JeR [1] http://packages.gentoo.org/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
