[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emacs/slime-cvs

2007-08-27 Thread Ulrich Mueller
# Ulrich Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] (27 Aug 2007) # Live CVS broken due to upstream changes, pending removal in 30 days. app-emacs/slime-cvs A substitute app-emacs/slime- is available in the gentoo-lisp overlay: http://repo.or.cz/w/gentoo-lisp-overlay.git Ulrich -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing

[gentoo-dev] New developer: Davide Italiano (dav_it)

2007-08-27 Thread Petteri Räty
Here follows the usual insults and introductions of our newest addition Davide dav_it Italiano. After realizing that we has trying to log in to dev.gentoo.org with a wrong user name he know has access to Gentoo development boxes. He will be using his powers in the Artwork and GWN teams. Davide is

[gentoo-dev] [QA] Repoman check for committing ebuilds with stable keywords

2007-08-27 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
Hi! From time to time i recognize that ebuilds are committed straight to stable into the gentoo tree, especially for version bumps where no changes in the ebuild are required. It also happens to me when providing ebuilds via bugzilla! So what about adding a repoman check to cover this. If a

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] Repoman check for committing ebuilds with stable keywords

2007-08-27 Thread Petteri Räty
Daniel Pielmeier kirjoitti: Hi! From time to time i recognize that ebuilds are committed straight to stable into the gentoo tree, especially for version bumps where no changes in the ebuild are required. It also happens to me when providing ebuilds via bugzilla! So what about adding a

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] Repoman check for committing ebuilds with stable keywords

2007-08-27 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110443 Thanks! It looks rather old! Why isn't it implemented? Regards, Daniel -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] Repoman check for committing ebuilds with stable keywords

2007-08-27 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 27 August 2007, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110443 It looks rather old! Why isn't it implemented? i bet if you posted a patch it'd get done quicker -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] Repoman check for committing ebuilds with stable keywords

2007-08-27 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
Mike Frysinger schrieb: On Monday 27 August 2007, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110443 It looks rather old! Why isn't it implemented? i bet if you posted a patch it'd get done quicker -mike I would do so if i had any python skills ;) For me as a non

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Davide Italiano (dav_it)

2007-08-27 Thread Davide Cendron
Il Monday 27 August 2007 18:02:01 Petteri Räty ha scritto: Here follows the usual insults and introductions of our newest addition Davide dav_it Italiano. After realizing that we has trying to log in to dev.gentoo.org with a wrong user name he know has access to Gentoo development boxes. He

[gentoo-dev] 2.4 profiles are on their way out!

2007-08-27 Thread Chris Gianelloni
As many of you may know, the Gentoo Kernel team has stopped supporting our last 2.4 kernel sources in the tree, gentoo-sources-2.4. Since we no longer have an officially supported 2.4 kernel on alpha/sparc/x86, I have deprecated the 2.4 profiles for those architectures. The 2.4 kernel has had a

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.4 profiles are on their way out!

2007-08-27 Thread Fernando J. Pereda
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:57:48AM -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: As many of you may know, the Gentoo Kernel team has stopped supporting our last 2.4 kernel sources in the tree, gentoo-sources-2.4. Since we no longer have an officially supported 2.4 kernel on alpha/sparc/x86, I have

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.4 profiles are on their way out!

2007-08-27 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 21:21 +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:08:34PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:57:48AM -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: As many of you may know, the Gentoo Kernel team has stopped supporting our last 2.4 kernel

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.4 profiles are on their way out!

2007-08-27 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 27 August 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 21:21 +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:08:34PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:57:48AM -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: As many of you may know, the Gentoo Kernel

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.4 profiles are on their way out!

2007-08-27 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 27 August 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 21:21 +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:08:34PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:57:48AM -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: As many of you may know, the Gentoo Kernel

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Davide Italiano (dav_it)

2007-08-27 Thread Dawid Węgliński
Dnia 27-08-2007, pon o godzinie 19:02 +0300, Petteri Räty napisał(a): Here follows the usual insults and introductions of our newest addition Davide dav_it Italiano. /me opens a beer Welcome! -- ,-. | Dawid Węgliński | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |

[gentoo-dev] Re: New developer: Davide Italiano (dav_it)

2007-08-27 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED]: After realizing that we has trying to log in to dev.gentoo.org with a wrong user name he know has access to Gentoo development boxes. He will be using his powers in the Artwork and GWN teams. That reminds me of the cartoon with a boy pushing the door that has

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New developer: Davide Italiano (dav_it)

2007-08-27 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Christian Faulhammer schrieb: Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED]: After realizing that we has trying to log in to dev.gentoo.org with a wrong user name he know has access to Gentoo development boxes. He will be using his powers in the Artwork and GWN teams. That reminds me of the cartoon

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.4 profiles are on their way out!

2007-08-27 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 16:18 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: Let this be a lesson to everyone. Just because you discussed it a couple months ago doesn't necessarily mean: a) it is still wanted -or- b) it is still valid so what is the 2.4 status then ? Well, we still don't support it

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.4 profiles are on their way out!

2007-08-27 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On E, 2007-08-27 at 17:11 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 16:18 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: Let this be a lesson to everyone. Just because you discussed it a couple months ago doesn't necessarily mean: a) it is still wanted -or- b) it is still valid

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.4 profiles are on their way out!

2007-08-27 Thread Josh Saddler
Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 16:18 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: Let this be a lesson to everyone. Just because you discussed it a couple months ago doesn't necessarily mean: a) it is still wanted -or- b) it is still valid so what is the 2.4 status then ? Well, we still