Re: [gentoo-dev] Managing users and groups

2007-09-09 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Sun, 2007-09-09 at 06:14 +0200, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: A group/user is created when no other ebuild has the dependency and is removed when the last ebuild has been removed which needs it? This blows up if you have to uninstall and reinstall a package, caused by blockers or whatever. Files

[gentoo-dev] net-wireless/ipw3945{,d} needs your help

2007-09-09 Thread Christian Heim
As some of you may know, I'm the sole (well, seemant is supposed to help too :P) maintainer of the above package. The problem with it is simply that it's closed source (at least the regulatory daemon and the ucode). The package itself is hopefully going away when iwl3945 is finally useable.

[gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.3 in ~arch

2007-09-09 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Hi all, I finished adding X.Org 7.3 to the tree tonight. The X server has an ABI break, so drivers compiled for xorg-server 1.3 or earlier will break. As per the 2.6.22 stable plans thread around the beginning of August, the X team is moving to the same policy as the kernel team. We will no

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-wireless/ipw3945{,d} needs your help

2007-09-09 Thread Benjamin Gramlich
I'd be willing to maintain it. Benjamin Gramlich On 9/9/07, Christian Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As some of you may know, I'm the sole (well, seemant is supposed to help too :P) maintainer of the above package. The problem with it is simply that it's closed source (at least the

[gentoo-dev] New eclass: cmake-utils.eclass

2007-09-09 Thread Wulf C. Krueger
Hello! As you might know, a very active Gentoo user, Zephyrus, several members of the KDE herd and other interested parties [1] are currently working on the pre-releases of KDE4 in the GenKDEsvn overlays [2]. KDE4's build system is based on CMake and seeing that more and more KDE and non-KDE

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: cmake-utils.eclass

2007-09-09 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
if ! emake -j1 check; then hasq test $FEATURES die Make check failed. See above for details. hasq test $FEATURES || eerror Make check failed. See above for details. fi No reason to check for test in FEATURES, make it die

[gentoo-dev] Re: New eclass: cmake-utils.eclass

2007-09-09 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Wulf C. Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As you might know, a very active Gentoo user, Zephyrus, several members of the KDE herd and other interested parties [1] are currently working on the pre-releases of KDE4 in the GenKDEsvn overlays [2]. Nice to hear. As I would like to introduce it to

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: cmake-utils.eclass

2007-09-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 09 September 2007, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote: if ! emake -j1 check; then hasq test $FEATURES die Make check failed. See above for details. hasq test $FEATURES || eerror Make check failed. See above for details. fi No reason

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: cmake-utils.eclass

2007-09-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 09 September 2007, Wulf C. Krueger wrote: KDE4's build system is based on CMake and seeing that more and more KDE and non-KDE applications are using it, we have created a new cmake-utils.eclass [3] which allows for easier implementation of ebuilds for those applications. * you've

[gentoo-dev] Re: New eclass: cmake-utils.eclass

2007-09-09 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Wulf C. Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As you might know, a very active Gentoo user, Zephyrus, several members of the KDE herd and other interested parties [1] are currently working on the pre-releases of KDE4 in the GenKDEsvn overlays [2]. Nice to hear. As I would like to introduce it to

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: cmake-utils.eclass

2007-09-09 Thread Wulf C. Krueger
Thanks for all your comments! Some ideas (especially the use_with/_enable shrinking) are rather spectacular and *all* are greatly appreciated. If there's more, please let us know. Until then, we'll make those changes you suggested and will follow-up on this tomorrow with the changed eclass.

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-wireless/ipw3945{,d} needs your help

2007-09-09 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 11:09:32AM +0200, Christian Heim wrote: The package itself is hopefully going away when iwl3945 is finally useable. What do you mean finally usable? I've been using iwl3945 on my laptop for close on 2 months, with no issues in the last month. Let the ipw3945 die already.