Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread Alin Năstac
John R. Graham wrote: Why can't the simple little default .bash_profile from /etc/skel be put into /root as well? $HOME directories shouldn't be touched by emerge. This is the user's turf. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 19 September 2007, Andrew Gaffney wrote: John R. Graham wrote: On the forums, I've seen the question, Why isn't my .bashrc being executed when I log in as root but is being executed when I log in as a normal user?, asked half a dozen times on the forums. Heck, I even asked it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 19 September 2007, Mike Doty wrote: John R. Graham wrote: like sys-apps/miscfiles. But where it should or shouldn't come from doesn't answer the fundamental question, Shouldn't it be there, from *some* source? Easy answer: no. Do you really want any script to automatically

[gentoo-dev] Guys, I need your assistance here

2007-09-20 Thread Arturo Garcia
Hi all, Unfortunately I have to come to gentoo-dev with this issue. It is regarding infamous packages.gentoo.org. Solar has closed the bug, I tried to reopened, but my account can't do that. I paste the comment I tried to put on the bug: (In reply to comment #61 (from solar)) This bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Donnerstag, 20. September 2007 schrieb ext Alin Năstac: John R. Graham wrote: Why can't the simple little default .bash_profile from /etc/skel be put into /root as well? $HOME directories shouldn't be touched by emerge. And especially not root's $HOME. Bye... Dirk -- Dirk

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-util/bk_client

2007-09-20 Thread Robin H. Johnson
bk_client is the BitKeeper client. It was originally added by vivo for live building of MySQL from the upstream BitKeeper repositories. The MySQL herd (basically me, since vivo left, and chtekk is away until 2008) don't support doing that in the MySQL eclass anymore, and additionally, anybody

Re: [gentoo-dev] Guys, I need your assistance here

2007-09-20 Thread George Shapovalov
Thursday, 20. September 2007, Arturo Garcia Ви написали: Hi all, [...] You know, it would be helpfull to know at least a number of the bug you refer to ;). Sorry for bringing this kind of crap to gentoo-dev but I had nowhere else to go. Actually you do. This should have gone to the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Guys, I need your assistance here

2007-09-20 Thread Arturo Garcia
On Thursday 20 Sep 2007, George Shapovalov wrote: Thursday, 20. September 2007, Arturo Garcia Ви написали: Hi all, [...] You know, it would be helpfull to know at least a number of the bug you refer to ;). http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187971 Sorry for bringing this kind of crap

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread John R. Graham
I didn't say anything about emerge; I was talking about the Stage tarballs. I know, I know: Catalyst uses emerge. But, hasn't anyone realized that bash is _broken_ if this file doesn't exist? Quoting from the upstream-provided man page, When an interactive shell that is not a login shell is

[gentoo-dev] New eclass to support java-virtuals

2007-09-20 Thread Alistair Bush
I would like to commit a new java eclass within the next week. This eclass is designed to support the functionality that Betelgeuse outlined within a previous post.[1] As you will be able to see, this eclass is very simple and only uses functionality that will be provided by the

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-java] New eclass to support java-virtuals

2007-09-20 Thread Petteri Räty
Alistair Bush kirjoitti: I would like to commit a new java eclass within the next week. This eclass is designed to support the functionality that Betelgeuse outlined within a previous post.[1] As you will be able to see, this eclass is very simple and only uses functionality that will be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread Andrew Gaffney
John R. Graham wrote: I didn't say anything about emerge; I was talking about the Stage tarballs. I know, I know: Catalyst uses emerge. But, hasn't anyone realized that bash is _broken_ if this file doesn't exist? Quoting from the upstream-provided man page, When an interactive shell that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Guys, I need your assistance here

2007-09-20 Thread Dawid Węgliński
Dnia 20-09-2007, czw o godzinie 13:15 +0200, Arturo Garcia napisał(a): On Thursday 20 Sep 2007, George Shapovalov wrote: Thursday, 20. September 2007, Arturo Garcia Ви написали: Hi all, [...] You know, it would be helpfull to know at least a number of the bug you refer to ;).

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread John R. Graham
Mike, I agree. But, the file that _must_ exist isn't ~/.bashrc but ~/.bash_profile. That's where the that particular bit of man-page-defined behavior is implemented. If ~/.bash_profile doesn't exist, then ~/.bashrc won't be sourced whether it exists or not. - John -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread John R. Graham
Andrew. Sorry 'bout the top posting; won't do it again. For the rest, please see my reply to Mike Auty on the same topic. - John -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread Duncan
John R. Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:18:46 -0400: But, hasn't anyone realized that bash is _broken_ if this file doesn't exist? Quoting from the upstream-provided man page, When an interactive shell that is not a login shell is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread Mike Auty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John R. Graham wrote: Mike, I agree. But, the file that _must_ exist isn't ~/.bashrc but ~/.bash_profile. That's where the that particular bit of man-page-defined behavior is implemented. If ~/.bash_profile doesn't exist, then ~/.bashrc won't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread Roy Marples
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 21:57 -0400, John R. Graham wrote: Why can't the simple little default .bash_profile from /etc/skel be put into /root as well /etc/skel is for users created by the add user commands. root is inherently added *before* bash is installed, thus doesn't get anything from skel.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread Renat Golubchyk
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:09:08 -0400 John R. Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike, I agree. But, the file that _must_ exist isn't ~/.bashrc but ~/.bash_profile. That's wrong. Quote: When bash is invoked as an interactive login shell, or as a non-inter- active shell with the --login option, it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You could add '[ -n ${BASH} -a -f ~/.bashrc ] . ~/.bashrc' to /etc/profile.d/bash.sh. This file could be installed by app-shells/bash. - -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

[gentoo-dev] lastriting media-sound/{pd,supercollider}

2007-09-20 Thread Samuli Suominen
# Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] ((20 Sep 2007) # These packages don't meet needed quality standards, # and maintaining ebuilds based on current building # system and release timing is not possible. # For pd, use pd-overlay found in layman global list. # For supercollider, use upstream

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-portage/elogviewer: ChangeLog elogviewer-0.5.2.ebuild

2007-09-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 20 September 2007, Christian Faulhammer (opfer) wrote: Index: elogviewer-0.5.2.ebuild src_install() { dobin ${WORKDIR}/elogviewer dodoc ${WORKDIR}/CHANGELOG doman ${WORKDIR}/elogviewer.1 make_desktop_entry elogviewer Elogviewer System ||

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emacs/junkbust

2007-09-20 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hallo, # Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (20 Sep 2007) # Is dead upstream # Junkbuster has been replaced by Privoxy, so no need for that mode app-emacs/junkbust -- Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode

Re: [gentoo-dev] Guys, I need your assistance here

2007-09-20 Thread Steve Dibb
Arturo Garcia wrote: And, I won't give up. I am very patient and packages.gentoo.org WILL come back to life one way or another. Even if it has to be rewritten. Personally, I don't see the problem of someone else picking up the pieces, rewriting it, and going to town with it. The source

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 03:03 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: what catalyst should do is just before cleaning up the stage3 root and packing it up is run `rsync -a /etc/skel/ /root/` It definitely should not. One of my primary motivations with catalyst is to ensure that the users get *exactly*

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 13:29 +0100, Roy Marples wrote: Also, don't assume that the root user uses the bash shell. The root user does *default* to the bash shell on Linux, at least. Of course, we could do whatever is appropriate for other targets. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 20 September 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 03:03 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: what catalyst should do is just before cleaning up the stage3 root and packing it up is run `rsync -a /etc/skel/ /root/` It definitely should not. One of my primary motivations

[gentoo-dev] Re: Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread Duncan
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:19:31 -0700: While I would normally agree, there's nothing wrong with having sensible defaults. After all, we install a bunch of stuff into /home/$user thanks to /etc/skel, so how is this

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-cluster/drbd: ChangeLog drbd-8.0.6.ebuild

2007-09-20 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 08:35 Thu 20 Sep , Christian Zoffoli (xmerlin) wrote: xmerlin 07/09/20 08:35:22 Modified: ChangeLog Added:drbd-8.0.6.ebuild Log: Version Bump. (Portage version: 2.1.2.2) 1.1 sys-cluster/drbd/drbd-8.0.6.ebuild file :

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-cluster/csync2: ChangeLog csync2-1.34.ebuild

2007-09-20 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 08:49 Thu 20 Sep , Christian Zoffoli (xmerlin) wrote: xmerlin 07/09/20 08:49:25 Modified: ChangeLog Added:csync2-1.34.ebuild Log: Version bump. (Portage version: 2.1.2.2) 1.1 sys-cluster/csync2/csync2-1.34.ebuild file :

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sci-biology/stride: stride-20011129.ebuild ChangeLog

2007-09-20 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 14:35 Thu 20 Sep , Santiago M. Mola (coldwind) wrote: coldwind07/09/20 14:35:18 Modified: stride-20011129.ebuild ChangeLog Log: Change sed separator to :, now it doesn't fail if CC contains a path. (Portage version: 2.1.3.9) Revision ChangesPath 1.6

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-cluster/csync2: ChangeLog csync2-1.34.ebuild

2007-09-20 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 2007-09-20 19:20:41 Donnie Berkholz napisał(a): On 08:49 Thu 20 Sep , Christian Zoffoli (xmerlin) wrote: xmerlin 07/09/20 08:49:25 Modified: ChangeLog Added:csync2-1.34.ebuild Log: Version

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 12:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: what catalyst should do is just before cleaning up the stage3 root and packing it up is run `rsync -a /etc/skel/ /root/` It definitely should not. One of my primary motivations with catalyst is to ensure that the users get

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass to support java-virtuals

2007-09-20 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 23:20 Thu 20 Sep , Alistair Bush wrote: - # Create package.env - ( - echo DESCRIPTION=\${DESCRIPTION}\ - echo GENERATION=\2\ - - [[ -n ${JAVA_PKG_CLASSPATH} ]] echo CLASSPATH=\${JAVA_PKG_CLASSPATH}\

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council 2007 Election Results

2007-09-20 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 09:58 +0800, Shyam Mani wrote: Our best wishes go out to the new Council members. Can someone write up something for our front page? Even better would be a nice press release on this to go out to the various media outlets. After all, it isn't that often that something

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-cluster/csync2: ChangeLog csync2-1.34.ebuild

2007-09-20 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 19:31 Thu 20 Sep , Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: src_compile() { econf \ --localstatedir=/var \ --sysconfdir=/etc/csync2 \ || die emake || die These could really use some die() messages, so you know which one failed.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council 2007 Election Results

2007-09-20 Thread Mike Doty
Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 09:58 +0800, Shyam Mani wrote: Our best wishes go out to the new Council members. Can someone write up something for our front page? Even better would be a nice press release on this to go out to the various media outlets. After all, it isn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-cluster/csync2: ChangeLog csync2-1.34.ebuild

2007-09-20 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 2007-09-20 19:53:53 Donnie Berkholz napisał(a): On 19:31 Thu 20 Sep , Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: src_compile() { econf \ --localstatedir=/var \ --sysconfdir=/etc/csync2 \

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass to support java-virtuals

2007-09-20 Thread Alistair Bush
Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 23:20 Thu 20 Sep , Alistair Bush wrote: -# Create package.env -( -echo DESCRIPTION=\${DESCRIPTION}\ -echo GENERATION=\2\ - -[[ -n ${JAVA_PKG_CLASSPATH} ]] echo

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-cluster/csync2: ChangeLog csync2-1.34.ebuild

2007-09-20 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 20 September 2007 19:54:16 Donnie Berkholz wrote: econf has default econf failed die message. The following would be sufficient:   econf \   --localstatedir=/var \   --sysconfdir=/etc/csync2 Is that so ... when did that appear? Does it happen for

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass to support java-virtuals

2007-09-20 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 06:58 Fri 21 Sep , Alistair Bush wrote: normally java-pkg_do_write_ is called to write the package.env out, as can be seen, and is the default behavior for the function. What I am adding is the ability to _do_write of a [virtual|provider].env file. While at present it only contains 3

[gentoo-dev] Re: Guys, I need your assistance here

2007-09-20 Thread Markus Ullmann
Dawid Węgliński schrieb: I'm curious, because i'm working with jokey to make p.g.o up. Right, he contributed a modified template, I wrote a new db generator already and now working on some genshi/cherrypy frontend to avoid this shtml stuff. So anyone who wants to join:

[gentoo-dev] Is anyone from infra around?

2007-09-20 Thread Georgi Georgiev
The IP for rsync1.jp.gentoo.org changed not too long ago. I notified gentoo-mirrors two weeks ago, but even today, neither the DNS nor the ACL has been updated. Could someone poke the relevant parties and refer them to the message below? http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-mirrors/msg_01262.xml

[gentoo-dev] Error mail

2007-09-20 Thread Yuriy Rusinov
Hello ! I'm sorry I send error mail. -- Best regards, Sincerely yours, Yuriy Rusinov

Re: [gentoo-dev] I've added you as a friend on StumbleUpon

2007-09-20 Thread Seemant Kulleen
Can we just unsubscribe this person from this list? This is absolutely ludicrous. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is anyone from infra around?

2007-09-20 Thread Mike Doty
Georgi Georgiev wrote: The IP for rsync1.jp.gentoo.org changed not too long ago. I notified gentoo-mirrors two weeks ago, but even today, neither the DNS nor the ACL has been updated. Could someone poke the relevant parties and refer them to the message below?

[gentoo-dev] Proper way to determine whether a profile is multilib?

2007-09-20 Thread Chris Gianelloni
OK. I'm looking at bug #173962[1] and bug #187683[2] currently and encountering a problem which I thought I would bring to the group to try to resolve. Both ATI and NVIDIA binary video drivers supply both 64-bit and 32-bit libraries. Now, our default profiles are multilib for amd64, but there

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread John R. Graham
Renat Golubchyk wrote: That's wrong. Quote: When bash is invoked as an interactive login shell, or as a non-inter- active shell with the --login option, it first reads and executes com- mands from the file /etc/profile, if that file exists. After reading that file, it looks for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-cluster/drbd: ChangeLog drbd-8.0.6.ebuild

2007-09-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 20 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 08:35 Thu 20 Sep , Christian Zoffoli (xmerlin) wrote: 1.1 sys-cluster/drbd/drbd-8.0.6.ebuild cp -R /usr/src/linux-${KV} ${WORKDIR} that cant be right emake -j1

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 20 September 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 12:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: what catalyst should do is just before cleaning up the stage3 root and packing it up is run `rsync -a /etc/skel/ /root/` It definitely should not. One of my primary

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-cluster/csync2: ChangeLog csync2-1.34.ebuild

2007-09-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 20 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 19:31 Thu 20 Sep , Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: src_compile() { econf \ --localstatedir=/var \ --sysconfdir=/etc/csync2 \ || die

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread John R. Graham
Roy Marples wrote: Looking over the bash man page, I cannot see the word recommended anywhere near .bash_profile. Could you clarify where you think bash recommends this? Thanks Roy Why, sure. It's my interpretation, but a reasonable one, I think. It recommends it in its

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread Roy Marples
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 19:17 -0400, John R. Graham wrote: Rats. I checked the source and you're right. My problem domain is smaller than I thought but still valid, I think. Basically the problem is only with interactive login shells and /root. Not *broken*, per se: just contrary to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread Roy Marples
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 21:22 -0400, John R. Graham wrote: Roy Marples wrote: Looking over the bash man page, I cannot see the word recommended anywhere near .bash_profile. Could you clarify where you think bash recommends this? Why, sure. It's my interpretation, but a reasonable

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread John R. Graham
Roy Marples wrote: No it's not. bash does not recommend anything of the sort. It just states what files are optionally used during initialisation. What I'm driving at is that you're making claims that things are broken or recommended when in fact they are not. Try reading some RFC's and then

[gentoo-dev] Re: Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread Duncan
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:34:41 -0400: we know that someone taking a stage3 has never configured anything before and so we can safely put defaults into /root/. Just to point out... I've seen people mention overlaying a

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass to support java-virtuals

2007-09-20 Thread Alistair Bush
Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 06:58 Fri 21 Sep , Alistair Bush wrote: normally java-pkg_do_write_ is called to write the package.env out, as can be seen, and is the default behavior for the function. What I am adding is the ability to _do_write of a [virtual|provider].env file. While at