> On the subject of Squid, it would be extremely useful if it could
> ignore some headers and respect others in figuring out if the page is
> already in the cache, without stripping the headers from the request
> (it is doable with Apache's mod_cache), so that two requests with only
> a slightly d
On Nov 29, 2007 7:06 PM, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Something must have motivated you to present this now. What was it, or
> to put it a different way, how would have things been different in your
> view had this policy been in effect? Point to other examples as well if
> you believe t
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 10:20:11AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > If you had bookmarks to the old style of URL, please consult the FAQ for
> > the new form. We are NOT rewriting these URLs:
> > '/packages/?category=media-sound;name=mp3unicode
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 28 Nov 2007
21:38:54 -0800:
> In fact, I believe exactly the opposite. What we want to create are
> basic philosophies to guide us. Nailing down a million tiny details is
> what makes things not fun, and what m
On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> If you had bookmarks to the old style of URL, please consult the FAQ for
> the new form. We are NOT rewriting these URLs:
> '/packages/?category=media-sound;name=mp3unicode'
> (The new form is '/package/media-sound/mp3unicode').
why ? you've
Alec Warner wrote:
> On 11/28/07, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 19:10 Tue 27 Nov , Alec Warner wrote:
>>
>>> No, because this is not a realistic requirement, it's an ideal case.
>>> People will just commit changes without documentation anyway.
>>>
>> Here's m
On Nov 29, 2007 1:43 AM, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Forcing people to write documentation won't get it written, people
> will continue to act like we just saw and either the rule will get
> ignored, or someone will change the rule, or people will leave because
> the rule is enforced
On Thursday 29 November 2007 09:46:01 Josh Saddler wrote:
> Josh Saddler wrote:
> > Benedikt Böhm wrote:
> >
> > If this goes through, please look over our existing apache-related
> > documentation and file a bug with any necessary changes.
>
> I updated our documentation, thanks to the massive pat
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The Linux kernel seems to still have contributors, despite its
> requirement.
You have been quoted on LWN:
"'The Linux kernel requires that any needed documentation accompany all
changes requiring said documentation -- part of the source-code patch
must ap
Josh Saddler wrote:
> Benedikt Böhm wrote:
>>
> If this goes through, please look over our existing apache-related
> documentation and file a bug with any necessary changes.
I updated our documentation, thanks to the massive patch sent my way by
hollow. (Thanks, Benedikt!)
As mentioned in an ema
10 matches
Mail list logo
