Hi all,
I've been talking with jsin about becoming a dev, specifically to help
with SynCE. I'm working on ebuilds for a major update, which are mostly
done, except for a couple of niggling problems.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=178807
http://www.synce.org/moin/IainBuchanan
jsin is a
On 1/30/08, Torsten Rehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 31 January 2008, Mateusz Mierzwinski wrote:
> > What should I do to make ebuilds and upload it to main portage mirror?
>
> Take a look at the Gentoo docs on writing[1] and contributing[2] ebuilds. If
> you've got any further question
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 04:14:48PM -0800, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> It really is best done in the tree first, so everything is correct for
> the snapshot. We didn't have much issue last time because we push
> "manifest1_obsolete" into the snapshot, so digests are removed, anyway,
> but I'd *really
On Thursday 31 January 2008, Mateusz Mierzwinski wrote:
> What should I do to make ebuilds and upload it to main portage mirror?
Take a look at the Gentoo docs on writing[1] and contributing[2] ebuilds. If
you've got any further questions, try the gentoo-dev-help mailing list or the
#gentoo-dev-
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 00:45 +0100, Santiago M. Mola wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008 12:32 AM, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:05:26AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > > Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > >> I think throwing up an announcement today/tomorrow for Thu
On Jan 31, 2008 12:32 AM, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:05:26AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> >> I think throwing up an announcement today/tomorrow for Thursday/Friday
> >> should be sufficient for this sort of a change, as
Hi!
I just want to know how to get more involved into Gentoo development?
I'm student, programmer with C/C++/PHP and SQL knowledge (IPC, Shared
Memory, Fifo's and pipes programming, threads, mutexes, fork's and
demonization). I've started my own project (http://www.matheos.org)
called "Apach
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:05:26AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>> I think throwing up an announcement today/tomorrow for Thursday/Friday
>> should be sufficient for this sort of a change, as it won't affect any
>> user who has a version of portage released in the past ~1
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
I think throwing up an announcement today/tomorrow for Thursday/Friday
should be sufficient for this sort of a change, as it won't affect any
user who has a version of portage released in the past ~1.5 years.
So, since it seems nobody objected it, time for the announceme
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 10:32 -0800, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> That nothing that you've said counters the package not being needed in
> the system target. In fact, the packages that you list all explicitly
> depend on debianutils, so they wouldn't break if we removed it from
> system. The problem i
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 12:35 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
> 'equery d debianutils' gives me
>
> app-admin/sysklogd-1.4.2_pre20061230 (sys-apps/debianutils)
> app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.3-r1 (userland_GNU? sys-apps/debianutils)
> sys-apps/mktemp-1.5 (>=sys-apps/debianutils-2.16.2)
>
> The 2nd c
On Jan 30, 2008 6:35 PM, Philip Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 'equery d debianutils' gives me
>
> app-admin/sysklogd-1.4.2_pre20061230 (sys-apps/debianutils)
> app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.3-r1 (userland_GNU? sys-apps/debianutils)
> sys-apps/mktemp-1.5 (>=sys-apps/debianutils-2.16.2)
>
>
080128 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> now that the mktemp binary has been moved out of debianutils
> and integrated straight into coreutils,
> perhaps it's time to ask how important this package is to everyone.
> current debianutils is part of "system" and provides:
> - installkernel
> - run-parts
> -
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Hello fellow devs, users and Gentoo community.
...
We ask all Foundation members and current devs to check if they are in
the correct lists and to confirm their details. In particular, devs
should check if they don't lack a join date in the ldap record[10].
T
14 matches
Mail list logo