Petteri Räty wrote:
Christian Faulhammer kirjoitti:
Hi,
in the Emacs overlay we imported the bzr.eclass from the xeffects
overlay. In the near future Emacs development will switch from CVS to
Bazaar and thus we need the new eclass in Portage to still provide our
live ebuilds from app-editors/e
# Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (19 Mar 2008)
# Deprecated in favour of net-firewall/conntrack-tools, which
# merges both conntrack and conntrackd (bug #213084).
# Going for removal on or about 19 Apr 2008:
net-firewall/conntrack
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Steve Long wrote:
Something that's been discussed on IRC is the idea of a .pbuild file,
written in Python. I can also think of .cbuild (C) .Cbuild (C++) .sbuild
(Scheme) .hbuild (Haskell) and .jbuild (guess;) as being of immediate use,
(although I accept I might be the only one interested in the
On 10:36 Tue 18 Mar , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 11:56 Tue 18 Mar , Wolfram Schlich (wschlich) wrote:
> > 1.1 net-im/jabberd2/jabberd2-2.1.23.ebuild
> >
> > file :
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-im/jabberd2/jabberd2-2.1.23.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=mar
On 11:56 Tue 18 Mar , Wolfram Schlich (wschlich) wrote:
> 1.1 net-im/jabberd2/jabberd2-2.1.23.ebuild
>
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-im/jabberd2/jabberd2-2.1.23.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:00:40 +0100
"Fabio Erculiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok thanks, is there any specific GLEP already? Or is it just a
> Paludis proposal?
It's something done by the Gentoo KDE people, rather than Paludis
(although admittedly :*/:= was designed largely by me). You'll be a
"Fabio Erculiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:00:40 +0100:
> Ok thanks, is there any specific GLEP already? Or is it just a Paludis
> proposal? I am just wondering when this stuff will hit the tree.
Portage was and remains the "official"
Rémi Cardona kirjoitti:
Petteri Räty a écrit :
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_a57bf5f459324975bae8843fe7cdf469.xml
Sorry I didn't respond to you Petteri, but this is clearly missing
packages. For sure, it's missing gnome-games which inherits both the
gnome2 and the games eclasse
On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> As the Bugzilla admin, this sounds reasonable, and it plays into some
> of my plans wrt to Bugzilla3. In that, depending on some bits with
> Bugzie3, I'd like to consider a radical re-arrangement of Products
> and Components, to help users find th
On 3/18/08, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:21:49 +0100
>
>
> See the section "Slot Dependencies" in chapter 9 of
> http://www.mailstation.de/pms.pdf .
Yeah I was already reading the updated parts, thanks
>
> In non technical terms:
>
> :* means, effectively
Steve Long napsal(a):
How do others feel about such an addition?
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_a450013b143e01a25810f66ff345c9d4.xml
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key
What would be the point of such a change? What problem are you trying to
solve or to improve?
You'll need to answer those questions anyway should you ever need to
write a GLEP for that.
Cheers
--
Rémi Cardona
LRI, INRIA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org maili
Something that's been discussed on IRC is the idea of a .pbuild file,
written in Python. I can also think of .cbuild (C) .Cbuild (C++) .sbuild
(Scheme) .hbuild (Haskell) and .jbuild (guess;) as being of immediate use,
(although I accept I might be the only one interested in the first ;)
The basic
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:21:49 +0100
"Fabio Erculiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Example:
> x11-libs/qt:*
>
> In that case, what Paludis will pull? x11-libs/qt:3 or x11-libs/qt:4 ?
> Is my understanding right?
> Also, could you make an example for the ":= slot dependency" syntax?
See the section
On 3/17/08, Wulf C. Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - USE dependencies, including some special operators
> - ranged dependencies
> - :* and := slot dependencies
> - PDEPEND "suggested:" label
Nice, is there any example in the kde overlay?
I'm interested in implementing the points above bu
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:11:43 +
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You'll find all the details in the following local copy of PMS with
> > the kdebuild-1 patch applied: http://www.mailstation.de/pms.pdf
> >
> Thanks, I'll have a closer look when I get some downtime.
Note that there're a
Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
> For quite some time now, our progress has been impaired by the absence of
> features like USE dependencies, ranged dependencies and suggested
> dependencies.
>
How do suggested dependencies help in your work?
> Most of us who are working on the overlay have been using alt
Tuesday, 18 of March 2008 07:43:35 Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Bo Ørsted Andresen a écrit :
> > On Tuesday 18 March 2008 00:42:02 Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> >>> Now, basically, if the portage metadata or QA people could tell me a
> >>> way to figure *all* the ebuilds that inherit gnome2 *and* have a
18 matches
Mail list logo
