[gentoo-dev] RE: [gentoo-dev-announce] New developer: Michael Hammer (mueli)

2008-05-06 Thread Duft Markus
Joinin us from Graz, Austria is Michael mueli Hammer. He will be joining us to maintain kerberos related packages. Michael is responsible for the infrastructure at the Graz University of Technology and they run Gentoo of course. So no longer do you have to think about moving to other

[gentoo-dev] Re: New developer: Michael Hammer (mueli)

2008-05-06 Thread Markus Ullmann
Petteri Räty schrieb: Joinin us from Graz, Austria is Michael mueli Hammer. He will be joining us to maintain kerberos related packages. Michael is responsible for the infrastructure at the Graz University of Technology and they run Gentoo of course. So no longer do you have to think about

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] New developer: Jeremy Olexa (darkside)

2008-05-06 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 05-05-2008 23:32:53 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: Another one bites the dust. It's my usual pleasure to introduce to your Jeremy darkside Olexa from Minneapolis, USA. On IRC he goes with the nick name darsiide because darkside is taken. Let's see if the current owner gives it up after the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for May

2008-05-06 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On 01 May 2008 05:30:01 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev list to see. I'd like a decision on the eight digits thing in PMS: No integer part of

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Michael Hammer (mueli)

2008-05-06 Thread Michael Hammer
* Duft Markus [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080506 08:13]: [...] Michael is responsible for the infrastructure at the Graz University of Technology [...] I've to correct this because I don't want to adorn myself with borrowed plumes ;) I am responsible for the infrastructure of the Insitute for Strength

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: qemu - add gcc-3.x dependency

2008-05-06 Thread Luca Barbato
Enrico Weigelt wrote: Hi folks, I'm just installing qemu, which requires gcc-3.x for building. The current breaks are very ugly, IMHO. So I'm proposing to add the old gcc-3.x as depedency to qemu, at least as long as it doesn't build w/ newer gcc. What do you think about this ? that

[gentoo-dev] preserving mtimes

2008-05-06 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, files installed by portage to ${ROOT} do not have the same time stamps as the same files in ${D}. This creates problems for Common Lisp implementations and one Scheme implementation in our overlay, explained in [1]. Current work-around is

Re: [gentoo-dev] preserving mtimes

2008-05-06 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 07 May 2008 00:44:28 +0200 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and I think that would be the correct thing to do, but either way I'd like PMS to specify what should happen wrt to mtimes, so that I can rely on that. PMS makes no guarantee as to what happens with mtimes,

Re: [gentoo-dev] preserving mtimes

2008-05-06 Thread Brian Harring
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 01:52:19AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 07 May 2008 00:44:28 +0200 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and I think that would be the correct thing to do, but either way I'd like PMS to specify what should happen wrt to mtimes, so that I can

Re: [gentoo-dev] preserving mtimes

2008-05-06 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: Hi list, files installed by portage to ${ROOT} do not have the same time stamps as the same files in ${D}. Any timestamp difference here is not due to portage itself (since portage-2.1.3). The timestamp change is