Albert Zeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 15 May 2008
16:24:10 +0200:
> I also don't like no* USE-flags that much. But there are already a lot
> available. I thought they were introduced because it's most probable
> that you want to have the specific supp
Packages in $subj will be removed in 30 days because:
- upstream is dead (for years in the case of the first 2 packages)
- I don't think they have even one gentoo user (who would be crazy
enough to install gentoo while using a dialup connection?)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital s
On 16:33 Thu 08 May , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Enforced retirement: After 2.5 hours on the previous topics, people had
> to go to sleep and jokey's computer broke. Instead of waiting till the
> next regular meeting, because of its urgency, we scheduled a special
> session next week at the sa
Samuli Suominen wrote:
If you have a entry in package.mask for removal, please do so now.
If you want treecleaners to handle it, please state so. Already cleaned
up quite a bit today, and yeah.. it will surely look bad in GMN ;-)
I'd propose to update dev-python/visual to the current beta (beta26
If you have a entry in package.mask for removal, please do so now.
If you want treecleaners to handle it, please state so. Already cleaned
up quite a bit today, and yeah.. it will surely look bad in GMN ;-)
Thanks, Samuli
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 15:42 +0200, Benedikt Morbach wrote:
> I think it should be made consistent or it should be turned into a
> local use flag.
> no-* or *-only flag don't make sense in my opinion, because you can
> get the same with:
> -gui instead of nogui (maybe -gtk/-qt4/-kde or something wo
I think it should be made consistent or it should be turned into a
local use flag.
no-* or *-only flag don't make sense in my opinion, because you can
get the same with:
-gui instead of nogui (maybe -gtk/-qt4/-kde or something would be even better)
-* server instead of server-only (sure, this can o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Albert Zeyer wrote:
| Hi!
[snip]
| So, what do you think?
I think it makes no sense to have a no-server no-gui option, so this just
doesn't map
cleanly to our binary use flag system.
Marijn
- --
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo
# Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (15 May 2008)
# Doesn't compile wrt bug #206250. Masked for treecleaners.
# Removed in ~60 days.
dev-util/rhide
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
