[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: new 'virtualization' project or herd

2008-05-16 Thread Tiziano Müller
Sorry that it took so long to answer, but I was quiet busy with real life. Mike Auty wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tiziano Müller wrote: | Hi everyone | | What do you think of creating a new 'virtualization' project or | herd/team? Sounds like a good idea,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: dedicated USE-flag is inconsequent and confusing

2008-05-16 Thread Santiago M. Mola
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 3:07 AM, Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, AFAIK USE defaults are an EAPI=1 feature, and thus not quite yet encouraged for the general tree. EAPI-1 is approved for use in the tree. People are encouraged to use it whenever they need any feature provided by it.

[gentoo-dev] FRC: debtools herd creation

2008-05-16 Thread Yuri Vasilevski
Hello All, I will be adding some debian build tools to the tree, and would like to create the debtools herd to associate with the packages. I'll be adding things like debhelper, lintian and a little bit later things like apt, aptitude, cdebootstrap, debian-live and some more. Also there is

Re: [gentoo-dev] FRC: debtools herd creation

2008-05-16 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 16 May 2008 11:19:45 -0500 Yuri Vasilevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll be adding things like debhelper, lintian and a little bit later things like apt, aptitude, cdebootstrap, debian-live and some more. Also there is debootstrap with [EMAIL PROTECTED] which I'd like to adopt. I

Re: [gentoo-dev] FRC: debtools herd creation

2008-05-16 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 16 May 2008, Yuri Vasilevski wrote: I will be adding some debian build tools to the tree, and would like to create the debtools herd to associate with the packages. I'll be adding things like debhelper, lintian and a little bit later things like apt, aptitude, cdebootstrap,

[gentoo-dev] Re: FRC: debtools herd creation

2008-05-16 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Yuri Vasilevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I will be adding some debian build tools to the tree, and would like to create the debtools herd to associate with the packages. Just please don't add Debian-OpenSSL ;) -- Diego Flameeyes Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpJFtnW9Ug70.pgp

Re: [gentoo-dev] FRC: debtools herd creation

2008-05-16 Thread Albert Zeyer
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 11:19 -0500, Yuri Vasilevski wrote: Hello All, I will be adding some debian build tools to the tree, and would like to create the debtools herd to associate with the packages. I'll be adding things like debhelper, lintian and a little bit later things like apt,

[gentoo-dev] why not player/stage/gazebo

2008-05-16 Thread Zhu Sha Zang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Someone can speak to me why this programs aren't in portage tree, cos they are a good programs to robotic area? I finded only this packages in overlay, but so old. If i wish to put this sources in portage what i need to do? thanks! - -- Zhu Sha Zang

Re: [gentoo-dev] why not player/stage/gazebo

2008-05-16 Thread Ioannis Aslanidis
They probably aren't in the tree because nobody asked for them to be in the tree. Please, be so kind to open an enhancement request at http://bugs.gentoo.org and provide a working ebuild if possible. On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Zhu Sha Zang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

Re: [gentoo-dev] why not player/stage/gazebo

2008-05-16 Thread Michel Filipe
Hello Zhu! Is a good time to most contribute with Gentoo. :D Ioannis Aslanidis escreveu: They probably aren't in the tree because nobody asked for them to be in the tree. Please, be so kind to open an enhancement request at http://bugs.gentoo.org and provide a working ebuild if possible.

[gentoo-dev] reminder - mips is unstable

2008-05-16 Thread Ryan Hill
Just a friendly reminder. Because the stable mips keyword is being phased out, there is no need to CC mips on stabilization bugs. Also try to refrain from dropping the mips keyword because of repoman warnings. They are probably caused by an ebuild having a stable mips keyword and a dependency on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: new 'virtualization' project or herd

2008-05-16 Thread Mike Auty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tiziano Müller wrote: | That's true. How about having a virtualization project which takes care of | the common part, the docs and the coordination (if any) and have separate | herds for larger subprojects? Sounds ideal. 5:) Mike 5:) -BEGIN