Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Eclass for gnome-python* split

2008-05-24 Thread Arun Raghavan
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Arun Raghavan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Feedback and comments (and even brickbats ;)) on the eclass are >> invited. > > * Don't install the COPYING file via the DOCS variable. > * The LICENSE should be kept per e

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Eclass for gnome-python* split

2008-05-24 Thread Christian Faulhammer
"Arun Raghavan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Feedback and comments (and even brickbats ;)) on the eclass are > invited. * Don't install the COPYING file via the DOCS variable. * The LICENSE should be kept per ebuild in my opinion -- Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project http://www.gentoo.org/pr

[gentoo-dev] Re: About herds and their non-existant use

2008-05-24 Thread Tiziano Müller
Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Sat, 24 May 2008, Tiziano Müller wrote: > >> Changing your name because of technical difficulties? This is really >> not the way to go. Systems have to be adjusted to meet our needs, >> not the other way round (in case it is possible of course). > > +1 > >> But n

[gentoo-dev] Re: About herds and their non-existant use

2008-05-24 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sat, 24 May 2008, Tiziano Müller wrote: > Changing your name because of technical difficulties? This is really > not the way to go. Systems have to be adjusted to meet our needs, > not the other way round (in case it is possible of course). +1 > But nevertheless, it would be nice to hav

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: About herds and their non-existant use

2008-05-24 Thread Tiziano Müller
Marius Mauch wrote: > have the raw XML file. Anyway, that's maybe more of a policy problem, > we just need to enforce 'name == mail alias' (or would that be such a > horrible requirement?) Ahem, yes. Consider these examples: 1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4) [EMAIL

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: About herds and their non-existant use

2008-05-24 Thread Tiziano Müller
Marius Mauch wrote: > Hmm, in that case maybe it's be possible to use a similar system for > devs, e.g. > > genone > > and only use the element for non-dev maintainers and upstream > contacts. Anyway, as long as we use the same tag to list both > individual and group maintainers it would be an

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Eclass for gnome-python* split

2008-05-24 Thread Arun Raghavan
Hello! 2008/5/24 Ali Polatel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Attached is a patch for two minor issues with the eclass. First try to > remove py-compile only if it exists. Second, python_mod_optimize is > ROOT aware (since recently). Thanks for the feedback ... I've checked in your patch. Best, -- Arun R

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Eclass for gnome-python* split

2008-05-24 Thread Ali Polatel
Arun Raghavan yazmış: > Greetings All, Hey there > I've been working on an ancient bug [1] requesting a split of the > gnome-python, gnome-python-extras, and gnome-python-desktop ebuilds. Good for you :P *snip* > > Feedback and comments (and even brickbats ;)) on the eclass are invited. > At