On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 23:41:17 +0200
Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > := only makes sense when something is both a DEPEND and an RDEPEND.
> > Actual behaviour, for Paludis, is that it rewrites := deps to :=blah
> > when writing to VDB any time it can, and leaves anything it can't
> > as
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 19:57:11 +0200
> Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I miss two things here:
>> a) What happens in case of DEPEND="", RDEPEND=">=cat/bar-2:=" ? Is
>> that defined? If yes, what does it mean? If not, what shall be the
>> package managers behavio
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 19:57:11 +0200
Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I miss two things here:
> a) What happens in case of DEPEND="", RDEPEND=">=cat/bar-2:=" ? Is
> that defined? If yes, what does it mean? If not, what shall be the
> package managers behaviour?
:= only makes sense when so
Tiziano Müller schrieb:
Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
Tiziano Müller schrieb:
Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
Tiziano Müller schrieb:
Hi everyone
I'd like to bring bug #229521 to your attention and see whether we can
come up with a solution for it.
The problem:
A package "foo" depends on a slotted pa
Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
> Tiziano Müller schrieb:
>> Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
>>
>>> Tiziano Müller schrieb:
Hi everyone
I'd like to bring bug #229521 to your attention and see whether we can
come up with a solution for it.
The problem:
A package "foo" depends
Tiziano Müller schrieb:
Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
Tiziano Müller schrieb:
Hi everyone
I'd like to bring bug #229521 to your attention and see whether we can
come up with a solution for it.
The problem:
A package "foo" depends on a slotted package "bar" _and_ more than one
slot of "bar" can sa
Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
> Tiziano Müller schrieb:
>> Hi everyone
>>
>> I'd like to bring bug #229521 to your attention and see whether we can
>> come up with a solution for it.
>>
>> The problem:
>> A package "foo" depends on a slotted package "bar" _and_ more than one
>> slot of "bar" can sati
Tiziano Müller schrieb:
Hi everyone
I'd like to bring bug #229521 to your attention and see whether we can
come up with a solution for it.
The problem:
A package "foo" depends on a slotted package "bar" _and_ more than one
slot of "bar" can satisfy this dependency.
Why this is a problem:
If th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
recently drscheme changed versioning scheme in such a way that the newer
versions(4.0.1) rank lower than the old versions(372). The only way to affect
ordering is to change the PV part of the filename, preferably the old one, so I
created a 0
Hi everyone
I'd like to bring bug #229521 to your attention and see whether we can
come up with a solution for it.
The problem:
A package "foo" depends on a slotted package "bar" _and_ more than one
slot of "bar" can satisfy this dependency.
Why this is a problem:
If the dependency looks like on
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Chrissy Fullam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Whats this for? It sounds interest.
>
> Here's the output of `fortune gentoo-dev -m robbat2`:
>
> http://pastebin.osuosl.org/8802
>
> Definitely of interest ;) The last fortune-mod-gentoo-dev set was
> Saturday 28
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Chrissy Fullam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whats this for? It sounds interest.
Here's the output of `fortune gentoo-dev -m robbat2`:
http://pastebin.osuosl.org/8802
Definitely of interest ;) The last fortune-mod-gentoo-dev set was
Saturday 28 July 2007 -- a new
Whats this for? It sounds interest.
Kind regards,
Christina Fullam
Gentoo Developer Relations Lead | Gentoo Public Relations
> -Original Message-
> From: Robin H. Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:26 AM
> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: [gento
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis kirjoitti:
I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the following
flags: "-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common".
-O1 enables some basic optimizations.
>
At least adding -O1 should not be problematic. I think vapier was
already sugges
14 matches
Mail list logo
