[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests

2008-07-07 Thread Duncan
Jim Ramsay [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:10:14 -0400: Here's an interesting solution for those who find it annoying though: Just file your own 0-day bump request in bugzilla. In theory some users would find this and just CC themselves on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests

2008-07-07 Thread Steev Klimaszewski
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 15:33 +, Duncan wrote: Jim Ramsay [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:10:14 -0400: Here's an interesting solution for those who find it annoying though: Just file your own 0-day bump request in bugzilla. In theory

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests

2008-07-07 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:10:14 -0400 Jim Ramsay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's an interesting solution for those who find it annoying though: Just file your own 0-day bump request in bugzilla. In theory some users would find this and just CC themselves on it. Other users could be shushed with

[gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy - dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-07 Thread Andrey Grozin
Hello *, Wouldn't it be nice to move scipy from sci-libs to dev-python? All similar and related packages live in dev-python: numeric, scientificpython, matplotlib... I know that moving packages is a major pain in the #$$, but the present situation seems illogical (I would never guess to

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy - dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-07 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 02:59 Tue 08 Jul , Andrey Grozin wrote: Wouldn't it be nice to move scipy from sci-libs to dev-python? All similar and related packages live in dev-python: numeric, scientificpython, matplotlib... I know that moving packages is a major pain in the #$$, but the present situation seems

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy - dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-07 Thread Joe Peterson
Donnie Berkholz wrote: I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be categorized functionally instead of by the language they're implemented in. 90% of the time you don't care about the language. But category moves are pretty much pointless, so I don't normally

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy - dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-07 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 21:51 Mon 07 Jul , Joe Peterson wrote: Donnie Berkholz wrote: I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be categorized functionally instead of by the language they're implemented in. 90% of the time you don't care about the language. But category

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy - dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-07 Thread Andrey Grozin
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote: I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be categorized functionally instead of by the language they're implemented in. 90% of the time you don't care about the language. But category moves are pretty much pointless, so I

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy - dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-07 Thread Joe Peterson
Donnie Berkholz wrote: I meant moves were largely pointless, although categories are to a lesser extent. Tags would be a lot better, since nothing can be categorized perfectly into a single place. Yes, I can see the benefit of a tag paradigm. I, myself, find it more trouble than benefit to

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] FEATURE=preserved-libs issues

2008-07-07 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2008-07-07 17:36:12 Paul Varner napisaƂ(a): 2. Upgrade to www-client/mozilla-firefox to version 3 After upgrading, perserved-libs kept a couple of the older libraries around and wanted to remerge firefox. emerge @preserved-libs did not get rid of the libraries and firefox would not run. It