This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
В Чтв, 21/08/2008 в 19:26 -0700, Alec Warner пишет:
src_prepare is a logically distinct action (maybe if we called it
src_patch it would be clearer?)
We are not only patching sources there but modify them by other means
too (like sed or find .. rm \{\};). So src_prepare is the name which
better
В Сбт, 23/08/2008 в 13:39 -0700, Zac Medico пишет:
Please consider a PROPERTIES=live value that, when set in an ebuild,
will serve to indicate that the ebuild will use some form of live
source code that may vary each time that the package is installed.
Does this (and previous similar threads)
В Пнд, 25/08/2008 в 11:40 -0700, Zac Medico пишет:
Peter Volkov wrote:
It's good feature for overlays, but I think we should avoid this in
portage tree as having same information in two places can be avoided in
this case: it's better and not so hard to write tool which will keyword
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Volkov wrote:
В Сбт, 23/08/2008 в 13:39 -0700, Zac Medico пишет:
Please consider a PROPERTIES=live value that, when set in an ebuild,
will serve to indicate that the ebuild will use some form of live
source code that may vary each time that
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 08:08:07 -0700
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this (and previous similar threads) suggestion means that
portage will not support GLEP 54? Or how it'll be related with said
glep?
It seems like GLEP 54 is intended to fill a similar gap in the
ebuild metadata.
