[gentoo-dev] Breakages due to new epatch behavior
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The fix applied for bug 237667 casued all patches that have a full path (other than /dev/nul) either on the left or right hand side to fail. Bugs 238648, 238464, 238402 were caused because of that and I fixed 3 more patches under dev-java. There seems to be many more of those in the tree. So, please revert the commit because stable ebuilds are also victims of the change. - -- Sincerely, Serkan KABA Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkjcA54ACgkQRh6X64ivZaIafQCbBun0BffGVj5YhQt0+WOG8XDq M5gAn0OtIECLHRENDT02LNsmmdZjYOv7 =aQAt -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for September 25
On 08:56 Tue 23 Sep , Zac Medico wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote > > on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev > > list to see. > > Please vote on deploying the PROPERTIES variable to the cache [1]. > Also, please vote on deploying PROPERTIES=interactive in ebuilds [2]. > > [1] > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_4f3815d44c50f988c8072eccb504c803.xml > [2] > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_1266d26d46320ed4d373a8d540577cad.xml I might not send an agenda out because this thread was so short and sweet, and I'm fairly busy. The additional item I'd like to add before PROPERTIES is whether there's any need for the council to approve either of these. I don't recall us approving cache changes in the past -- I think that's been done by the portage team. I tend to say we don't need to vote on PROPERTIES in cache, but perhaps we should on 'interactive' so that global ebuild variables, even without EAPI changes, are approved by the council. -- Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com pgpGLTx06Y1FE.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: World file handling changes in Portage-2.2
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 17:24:57 +0200 Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - another idea that hasn't been mentioned yet is that we could simply > inject @system into world_sets in the portage ebuild when we detect a > 2.1->2.2 upgrade (the ebuild already does a few other migrations that > way). That would be the least-invasive way to keep the old behavior, > but only works for poeple who haven't upgraded to 2.2 yet (not sure if > that's a pro or contra) This solution has been implemented now (to be released with >2.2_rc9). Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
