[gentoo-dev] Re: Announce: red5 overlay available for testing

2008-10-24 Thread Duncan
Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 24 Oct 2008 01:05:19 +0200: YFYI, I've written a bunch of ebuilds for red5 and its deps: FWIW, if anyone else is wondering WTF is red5, google's first hit says Red5 is an Open Source Flash Server written in

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI change: Call ebuild functions from trusted working directory

2008-10-24 Thread Robert Buchholz
On Friday 17 October 2008, Robert Buchholz wrote: On Monday 13 October 2008, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: It's a retroactive change to EAPI 0 that requires changes from package managers and has security implications... Robert isn't requesting that we specify and mandate existing behaviour here,

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Having a seperate package for libiptc

2008-10-24 Thread Bjarke Istrup Pedersen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey all, ~From version 1.4.1.1 of iptables, libiptc headers and library is no longer installed. Since some programs still depends on it (net-misc/miniupnpd which will be hitting the tree as soon as this is sorted out, and probably some other

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Having a seperate package for libiptc

2008-10-24 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:52:40AM +0200, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote: What do you think - Should I add this library ebuild to the tree, or should I just give up getting miniupnpd added to the tree, since there is no alternative to using libiptc? I already have an ebuild for it that compiles

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Having a seperate package for libiptc

2008-10-24 Thread Bjarke Istrup Pedersen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robin H. Johnson skrev: | On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:52:40AM +0200, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote: | What do you think - Should I add this library ebuild to the tree, or | should I just give up getting miniupnpd added to the tree, since there | is no